Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

STUF - Language Typology and Universals

Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung

Editor-in-Chief: Stolz, Thomas


CiteScore 2018: 0.42

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.231
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.343

Print + Online
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 65, Issue 2

Issues

Stress-timed = word-based? Testing a hypothesis in prosodic typology

René Schiering
  • 1 Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Institut für Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Münster, Deutschland
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Balthasar Bickel / Kristine A. Hildebrandt
Published Online: 2012-06-14 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1524/stuf.2012.0010

Abstract

In recent research on cross-linguistic differences in linguistic rhythm, it has been hypothesized that the traditional dichotomy ‘stress-timed’ versus ‘syllable-timed’ might be recast with respect to which level of the Prosodic Hierarchy constitutes the most prominent domain for the organization of prosodic structure. In this paper, we test the prediction that ‘stress-timed’ languages are characterized by a dominance of the prosodic word against a typological sample of 58 languages. Although there is a slight cross-linguistic tendency in favor of the prediction, there is no statistical support for the proposed correlation. Since counterexamples include not only individual languages but also entire language families, we advocate a different view on prosodic word domain structure. The prosodic word profile of a given language is more reliably predicted by the family membership of that language than by universal correlations concerning its rhythm class membership. We substantiate this claim by a survey of Mon-Khmer’s family signature on prosodic word domain structure in Mon, where sound patterns target either the monosyllabic stem or the maximally inflected disyllabic word.

Keywords: prosodic typology; linguistic rhythm; stress-timed language; prosodic word; Mon-Khmer

About the article

Published Online: 2012-06-14

Published in Print: 2012-06-01


Citation Information: STUF - Language Typology and Universals Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung, Volume 65, Issue 2, Pages 157–168, ISSN (Print) 1867-8319, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1524/stuf.2012.0010.

Export Citation

© by Akademie Verlag, Edwardsville IL, Germany.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in