Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

STUF - Language Typology and Universals

Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung

Editor-in-Chief: Stolz, Thomas

4 Issues per year


CiteScore 2017: 0.19

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.166
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.506

Online
ISSN
2196-7148
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 70, Issue 4

Issues

Instrumental semantic map in Western Iranian languages

Masoud Mohammadirad
  • Corresponding author
  • Université Sorbonne Nouvelle Paris 3, UMR 7528 – Mondes Iranien et Indien – CNRS, 27, Rue Paul Bert, 94200 Ivry-sur-Seine, Paris, France
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Mohammad Rasekh-Mahand
Published Online: 2017-10-20 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/stuf-2017-0025

Abstract

This paper aims to study instrumental related functions in some Western Iranian languages. The data were collected from descriptive grammars, and interviews in some cases. Narrog’s instrumental semantic map is the basis for analyzing polysemy patterns in these languages. The data show that two main polysemy patterns are attested: (1) Instrumental and companion functions are coded alike. (2) They are coded differently. These two patterns are distributed areally. Furthermore, some languages are shifting/have shifted between these two types mainly as a result of contact-induced matters. In languages in which two or more functions are not directly connected, one marker generally has both instrumental and dative functions.

Keywords: semantic map; connectivity; instrumental marker; polysemy patterns; Western Iranian languages

References

  • Anderson, Lloyd B. 1982. The ‘perfect’ as a universal and as a language-particular category. In Paul J. Hopper (ed.), Tense-aspect: Between semantics & pragmatics, 227–264. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Anderson, Lloyd B. 1986. Evidentials, paths of change, and mental maps: Typologically regular asymmetries. In Wallace Chafe & Johanna Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic encoding of epistemology, 273–312. Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar

  • Anonby, Erik & Ashraf Asadi. 2014. Bakhtiari studies: Phonology, text, lexicon. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.Google Scholar

  • Authier, Gilles. 2012. Grammaire juhuri, ou judéo-tat, langue iranienne des Juifs du Caucase de l’est. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar

  • Auwera, Johan van der. 2013. Semantic maps: For synchrony and diachrony. In Anna Giacalone Ramat, Caterina Mauri & Piera Molinelli (eds.), Synchrony and diachrony: A dynamic interface, 153–176. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Auwera, Johan van der & Andrej Malchukov. 2005. A semantic map for depictive adjectivals. In Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Eva Schultze-Berndt (eds.), Secondary predication and adverbial modification, 393–421. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Auwera, Johan van der & Vladimir A. Plungian. 1998. Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology 2(1). 79–124.Google Scholar

  • Axenov, Serge. 2006. The Balochi language of Turkmenistan. A corpus-based grammatical description [Studia Iranica Upsaliensia 10]. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.Google Scholar

  • Bedir Khan, Emir & Roger Lescot. 1970. Grammaire kurde (dialecte kurmandji). Paris: Adrien Maisonneuve.Google Scholar

  • Croft, William. 2001. Radical construction grammar. Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Croft, William. 2003. Typology and universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Croft, William & Keith T. Poole. 2008. Inferring universals from grammatical variation: Multidimensional scaling for typological analysis. Theoretical Linguistics 34(1). 1–37.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Cysouw, Michael. 2007. Building semantic maps: The case of person marking. In Matti Miestamo & Bernhard Wälchli (eds.), New challenges in typology, 225–248. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar

  • Cysouw, Michael, Martin Haspelmath & Andrej Malchukov. 2010. Introduction to special issue “Semantic maps: Methods and applications”. Linguistic Discovery 8(1). 1–3.Google Scholar

  • Dabir-Moghaddam, Mohammad. 2013. Typology of Iranian languages. 2 vols. Tehran: Samt.Google Scholar

  • Haig, Geoffrey & Fatemeh Nemati 2013. Clitics at the syntax-pragmatics inference: The case of Delvāri pronominal enclitics. Conference paper held at the ICIL 5, Bamberg.Google Scholar

  • Haspelmath, Martin. 1997a. Indefinite pronouns. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Haspelmath, Martin. 1997b. From space to time: Temporal adverbials in the world’s languages. Munich/Newcastle: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar

  • Haspelmath, Martin. 2003. The geometry of grammatical meaning: Semantic maps and cross-linguistic comparison. In Michael Tomasello (ed.), The new psychology of language. Vol. 2, 211–242. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

  • Jahani, Karina & Agnes Korn. 2009. Balochi. In Gernot Windfuhr (ed.), The Iranian languages, 634–692. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Janda, Laura A. 2007. Aspectual clusters of Russian verbs. Studies in Language 31. 607–648.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Kemmer, Suzanne. 1993. The middle voice. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Lehmann, Christian & Yong-Min Shin. 2005. The functional domain of concomitance. A typological study of instrumental and comitative relations. In Christian Lehmann (ed.). Typological studies in participation, 9–104. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar

  • Levinson, Stephen C., Sergio Meira & the Language and Cognition Group. 2003. ‘Natural concepts’ in the spatial topological domain – adpositional meanings in crosslinguistic perspective: An exercise in semantic typology. Language 79(3). 485–516.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Luraghi, Silvia. 2001. Syncretism and the classification of semantic roles. Language Typology and Universals/STUF 54(1). 35–51.Google Scholar

  • MacKenzie, David N. 1966. The dialect of Awroman (Hawrāmānī luhōn). Kobenhaven: Det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab.Google Scholar

  • Mahmoudveysi, Parvin, Denise Baily, Ludwig Paul & Geoffrey Haig. 2012. The Gorani language of Gawraju, a village of West Iran. Texts, grammar, and lexicon. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar

  • Malchukov, Andrej L. 2004. Towards a semantic typology of adversative and contrast marking. Journal of Semantics 21(2). 177–198.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McCarus, Ernest N. 2009. Kurdish. In Gernot Windfuhr (ed.), The Iranian languages, 587–633. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Najafi, A. 1999. Colloquial Persian dictionary. Tehran: Niloofar.Google Scholar

  • Narrog, Heiko. 2009. Varieties of instrumental. In Andrej Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of case. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Narrog, Heiko. 2010. A diachronic dimension in maps of case functions. Linguistic Discovery 8(1). 233–254.Google Scholar

  • Narrog, Heiko & Shinya Ito. 2007. Reconstructing semantic maps: The comitative-instrumental area. Language Typology and Universals/STUF 60(4). 273–292.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Newman, John. 1996. Give: A cognitive linguistic study. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Nourzaei, Mariam, Carina Jahani, Erik Anonby & Abbas Ali Ahangar. 2015. Koroshi. A corpus-based grammatical description. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.Google Scholar

  • Paul, Daniel. 2011. A comparative dialectal description of Iranian Taleshi. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Manchester.Google Scholar

  • Rastorgueva, V. S., A. A. Kerimova, A. K. Mamedzade, L. A. Pireiko & D. I. Edel’man. 2012. The Gilaki language. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.Google Scholar

  • Rice, Sally & Kaori Kabata. 2007. Crosslinguistic grammaticalization patterns of Allative. Linguistic Typology 11(3). 451–514.Google Scholar

  • Samvelian, Pollet. 2007. A (phrasal) affix analysis of Persian Ezafe. Journal of Linguistics 43(3). 605–645.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Stassen, Leon. 1997. Intransitive predication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Stilo, Donald. 2016. Mazanderani, entry for Encyclopedia Iranica (draft version).Google Scholar

  • Stolz, Thomas, Cornelia Stroh & Aina Urdze. 2013. Comitatives and instrumentals. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://wals.info/chapter/52 (Accessed 20 July 2015)

  • Thackston, Wheeler M. 2006a. Kurmanji Kurdish. A reference grammar with selected readings. http://www.fas.harvard.edu/~iranian/Kurmanji/

  • Thackston, Wheeler M. 2006b. Sorani Kurdish. A reference grammar with selected readings. http://www.fas.harvard.edu/~iranian/Sorani/

  • Windfuhr, Gernot. 2009. The Iranian languages. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Yamaguchi, Kazuyuki.2004. A typological, historical, and functional study of adpositions in the languages of the world. PhD thesis, University of New Mexico.Google Scholar

  • Yar-Shater, Ehsan. 1969. A grammar of Southern Tati dialects. The Hague/Paris: Mouton.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2017-10-20

Published in Print: 2017-10-26


Citation Information: STUF - Language Typology and Universals, Volume 70, Issue 4, Pages 579–610, ISSN (Online) 2196-7148, ISSN (Print) 1867-8319, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/stuf-2017-0025.

Export Citation

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in