Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

STUF - Language Typology and Universals

Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung

Editor-in-Chief: Stolz, Thomas

4 Issues per year


Cite Score 2016: 0.14

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.176
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.518

Online
ISSN
2196-7148
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 70, Issue 4

Issues

Desires, wishes and hopes – Desiderative predicates and presuppositions

André Meinunger
  • Corresponding author
  • Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft (ZAS), Schützenstraße 18, 10117 Berlin, Germany
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2017-10-20 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/stuf-2017-0026

Abstract

The expression of a desire – a wish, a request, a demand, one’s will – triggers a presupposition. This has grammatical consequences, such as mood choice in Romance, verbal positioning in Germanic or complementizer selection in Slavic. Desiderative predicates are argued to contain special features of (counter-) factivity. This explains the strikingly similar behavior of emotive factive and implicative predicates as well as volitional and request expressions; it also captures some common characteristics with negated affirmative predicates.

Keywords: verbal mood; subjunctive; verb second; desideratives; optative predicates; factivity; anti-factivity

References

  • Anscombe, Gertrude E. M. 2000. Intention. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

  • Bolinger, Dwight. 1968. Postposed main phrases: An English rule for the Romance subjunctive. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 14. 3–30.Google Scholar

  • Chierchia, Gennaro & Sally McConnell-Ginet. 1990. Meaning and grammar: An introduction to meaning. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Davis, Wayne. 1984. A causal theory of intending. American Philosophical Quarterly 21. 43–54.Google Scholar

  • Égré, Paul. 2008. Question-embedding and factivity. Grazer Philosophische Studien 77. 85–125.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fabricius-Hansen, Cathrin & Kjell Johan Sæbø. 2004. In a mediative mood: The semantics of the German reportative subjunctive. Natural Language Semantics 12. 213–257.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Farkas, Donka. 1985. Intensional descriptions and the Romance subjunctive mood. New York: Garland.Google Scholar

  • Farkas, Donka. 1992. On the semantics of subjunctive complements. In Paul Hirschbühler & E. F. K. Koerner (eds.), Romance languages and modern linguistic theory, 69–104. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Featherston, Sam. 2004. Bridge verbs and V2 verbs – the same thing in spades? Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 23. 181–209.Google Scholar

  • Freywald, Ulrike. 2008. Zur Syntax und Funktion von dass-Sätzen mit Verbzweitstellung. Deutsche Sprache 36. 246–285.Google Scholar

  • Giannakidou, Anastasia. 1998. Polarity sensitivity as (non)veridical dependency. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Giannakidou, Anastasia. 2009. The dependency of the subjunctive revisited: Temporal semantics and polarity. Lingua 120. 1883–1908.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Heim, Irene. 1991. Artikel und Definitheit. In Arnim Von Stechow & Dieter Wunderlich (eds.), Semantik: Ein internationales Handbuch der zeitgenössischen Forschung, 487–535. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Heim, Irene. 1992. Presupposition projection and the semantics of attitude verbs. Journal of Semantics 9. 183–221.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hintikka, Jaakko. 1974. Questions about questions. In Milton K. Munitz & Peter K. Unger (eds.), Semantics and philosophy, 103–158. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar

  • Hooper, Joan B. & Sarah A. Thompson. 1973. On the applicability of root transformations. Linguistic Inquiry 4. 465–479.Google Scholar

  • Iatridou, Sabine. 2000. The grammatical ingredients of counterfactuality. Linguistic Inquiry 31(2). 231–270.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Karttunen, Lauri. 1971. Implicative verbs. Language 47. 340–358.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Karttunen, Lauri. 1974. Presupposition and linguistic context. Theoretical Linguistics 1. 181–194. Also in Steven Davis (ed.) 1991. Pragmatics: A reader, 406–415. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Kavanagh, David J., Jackie Andrade & Jon May. 2005. Imaginary relish and exquisite torture: The elaborated intrusion theory of desire. Psychological Review 112(2). 446–467.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kempchinsky, Paula. 1987. The subjunctive disjoint reference effect. In Carol Neidle & Rafael Nunez-Cedeno (eds.), Studies in romance languages, 123–140. Foris: Dordrecht.Google Scholar

  • Kiparsky, Paul & Carol Kiparsky. 1970. Fact. In Manfred Bierwisch & Karl-Erich Heidolph (eds.), Progress in linguistics, 143–173. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

  • Klein, Ewan. 1975. Two sorts of factive predicate. Pragmatic Microfiche 1(1). B5–C14.Google Scholar

  • Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Meinunger, André. 2004. Verb position, verbal mood and the anchoring (potential) of sentences. In Horst Lohnstein & Susanne Trissler (eds.), The syntax and semantics of the left periphery, 313–341. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Meinunger, André. 2006. On the discourse impact of subordinate clauses. In Valeria Molnár & Susanne Winkler (eds.), Architecture of focus, 459–487. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Morgan, Jerry L. 1969. On the treatment of presuppositions in transformational grammar. In Robert I. Binnick, Alice Davison, Georgia Green & Jerry L. Morgan (eds.), Papers from the fifth regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, 167–177. Chicago: Department of Linguistics, University of Chicago.Google Scholar

  • Portner, Paul. 1997. The semantics of mood, complementation, and conversational force. Natural Language Semantics 5. 167–212.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Quer, Josep. 1998. Mood at the interface. the Netherlands: Universiteit Utrecht PhD dissertation.Google Scholar

  • Reis, Marga. 1977. Präsuppositionen und Syntax. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar

  • Reis, Marga. 1997. Zum syntaktischen Status unselbständiger Verbzweit-Sätze. In Christa Dürscheid, Karl-Heinz Ramers & Monika Schwarz (eds.), Sprache im Fokus. Festschrift für Heinz Vater zum 65. Geburtstag, 121–144. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar

  • Sauerland, Uli & Penka Stateva (eds.). 2007. Presupposition and implicature in compositional semantics. Houndmills: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar

  • Schlenker, Philippe. 2005. The lazy Frenchman’s approach to the subjunctive (Speculations on reference to worlds and semantic defaults in the analysis of mood). In Twan Geerts, Ivo van Ginneken & Haike Jacobs (eds.), Romance languages and linguistic theory 2003. Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’, 269–309. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Schroeder, Tim. 2009. Entry desire. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/desire/.

  • Searle, John R. 1969. Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Searle, John R. 1975. A taxonomy of illocutionary acts. In Keith Gunderson (ed.), Language, mind, and knowledge, 344–369. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

  • Singh, Raj. 2011. Maximize presupposition! and local contexts. Natural Language Semantics 19(2). 149–168.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Soames, Scott. 1982. How presuppositions are inherited: A solution to the projection problem. Linguistic Inquiry 13. 483–545.Google Scholar

  • Stalnaker, Robert C. 1974. Pragmatic presuppositions. In Milton K. Munitz & Peter K. Unger (eds.), Semantics and philosophy, 197–213. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar

  • Stalnaker, Robert C. 1984. Inquiry. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Strawson, Peter F. 1952. Introduction to logical theory. London: Methuen.Google Scholar

  • Truckenbrodt, Hubert. 2006. On the semantic motivation of syntactic verb movement to C in German. Theoretical Linguistics 32(3). 257–306.Google Scholar

  • Villalta, Elisabeth. 2009. Mood and gradability: An investigation of the subjunctive mood in Spanish. Linguistics and Philosophy 31(4). 467–522.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Wiklund, Anna-Lena, Kristine Bentzen, Gunnar Hrafn Hrafnbjargarson & Þorbjörg Hróarsdóttir. 2009. On the distribution and illocution of V2 in Scandinavian that-clauses. Lingua 119(12). 1914–1938.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2017-10-20

Published in Print: 2017-10-26


This work was supported by the German Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) (Grant Nr. 01UG0711)


Citation Information: STUF - Language Typology and Universals, Volume 70, Issue 4, Pages 611–635, ISSN (Online) 2196-7148, ISSN (Print) 1867-8319, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/stuf-2017-0026.

Export Citation

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston. Copyright Clearance Center

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in