Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

STUF - Language Typology and Universals

Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung

Editor-in-Chief: Stolz, Thomas


CiteScore 2018: 0.42

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.231
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.343

Online
ISSN
2196-7148
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 72, Issue 3

Issues

Word order of numeral classifiers and numeral bases

Harmonization by multiplication

One-Soon Her
  • Graduate Institute of Linguistics/Research Center for Brain, Mind, and Learning, National Chengchi University, Taipei City 11605, Taiwan (R.O.C.)
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Marc Tang
  • Corresponding author
  • Department of Linguistics and Philology, Uppsala University, P.O. Box 635, Uppsala 75126, Sweden
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Bing-Tsiong Li
Published Online: 2019-09-28 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/stuf-2019-0017

Abstract

In a numeral classifier language, a sortal classifier (C) or a mensural classifier (M) is needed when a noun is quantified by a numeral (Num). Num and C/M are adjacent cross-linguistically, either in a [Num C/M] order or [C/M Num]. Likewise, in a complex numeral with a multiplicative composition, the base may follow the multiplier as in [n×base], e.g., san-bai ‘three hundred’ in Mandarin. However, the base may also precede the multiplier in some languages, thus [base×n]. Interestingly, base and C/M seem to harmonize in word order, i.e., [n×base] numerals appear with a [Num C/M] alignment, and [base×n] numerals, with [C/M Num]. This paper follows up on the explanation of the base-C/M harmonization based on the multiplicative theory of classifiers and verifies it empirically within six language groups in the world’s foremost hotbed of classifier languages: Sinitic, Miao-Yao, Austro-Asiatic, Tai-Kadai, Tibeto-Burman, and Indo-Aryan. Our survey further reveals two interesting facts: base-initial ([base×n]) and C/M-initial ([C/M Num]) orders exist only in Tibeto-Burman (TB) within our dataset. Moreover, the few scarce violations to the base-C/M harmonization are also all in TB and are mostly languages having maintained their original base-initial numerals but borrowed from their base-final and C/M-final neighbors. We thus offer an explanation based on Proto-TB’s base-initial numerals and language contact with neighboring base-final, C/M-final languages.

Keywords: classifier; multiplication; numeral base; harmonization

References

  • Adams, Karen L. 1986. Numeral classifiers in Austroasiatic. In Colette G. Craig (ed.), Noun classes and categorization, 241–262. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2000. Classifiers: A typology of noun categorization devices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Allan, Keith. 1977. Classifiers. Language 53(2). 285–311.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Au Yeung, Wai-Hoo B. 2005. An interface program for parameterization of classifiers in Chinese (PhD dissertation). Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong.Google Scholar

  • Au Yeung, Wai-Hoo B. 2007. Multiplication basis of emergence of classifiers. Language and Linguistics 8(4). 835–861.Google Scholar

  • Bauer, Christian. 1992. Review of: Adams Karen Lee: Systems of numeral classification in the Mon-Khmer, Nicobarese and Aslian subfamilies of Austroasiatic. Canberra: Australian National University, Research School of Pacific Studies, 1989 [pub.1990]. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 55(2). 374–378.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Beckwith, Christopher I. 2007. Phoronyms: Classifiers, class nouns, and the pseudopartitive construction. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

  • Benedict, Paul K. 1987. Early MY/TB loan relationships. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 10(2). 12–21.Google Scholar

  • Bhattacharya, Tanmoy. 2001. Numeral/quantifier-classifier as a complex head. In Norbert Corver & Henk C. van Riemsdijk (eds.), Semi-lexical categories: The function of content words and the content of function words, 191–221. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Bickel, Balthasar. 2014. Linguistic diversity and universals. In N. J. Enfield, Paul Kockelman & Jack Sidnell (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of linguistic anthropology, 101–124. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Bisang, Walter. 1999. Classifiers in East and Southeast Asian languages: Counting and beyond. In Jadranka Gvozdanović (ed.), Numeral types and changes worldwide, 113–186. München: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Biswas, Priyanka. 2013. Plurality in a classifier language: Two types of plurals in Bangla. Proceedings of generative linguists of the Old World in Asia (GLOW in Asia), 1–14.Google Scholar

  • Burling, Robbins. 2004. The language of the Modhupur Mandi (Garo). Vol. 1: Grammar. New Delhi: Bibliophile South Asia.Google Scholar

  • Chan, Eugene. 2017. Numeral systems of the world languages. Retrieved from https://mpi-lingweb.shh.mpg.de/numeral/.

  • Comrie, Bernard. 2006. Numbers, language, and culture. Presented at the Jyväskylä Summer School, Jyväskylä.Google Scholar

  • Comrie, Bernard. 2013. Numeral bases. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online at http://wals.info/chapter/131, Accessed on 2018- 07-13.)

  • Corbett, Greville G. 2013. Number of genders. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online at http://wals.info/chapter/30, Accessed on 2018- 07-13.)

  • Dayal, Veneeta. 2014. Bangla plural classifiers. Language and Linguistics 15(1). 47–87.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dryer, Matthew S. 1998. Why statistical universals are better than absolute universals. Papers from the 33rd Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 1–23.Google Scholar

  • Emeneau, Murray B. 1956. India as a linguistic area. Language 32(1). 3–16.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fu, Jingqi. 2015. The status of classifiers in Tibeto-Burman languages. In Dan Xu & Jingqi Fu (eds.), Space and quantification in languages of China, 37–54. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

  • Gil, David. 2013. Numeral classifiers. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online at http://wals.info/chapter/55, Accessed on 2018-07-13.)

  • Greenberg, Joseph H. 1990 [1972]. Numerical classifiers and substantival number: Problems in the genesis of a linguistic type. In Keith Denning & Suzanne Kemmer (eds.), On language. Selected writings of Joseph H. Greenberg, 166–193. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. [First published 1972 in Working Papers on Language Universals 9. 1–39.]Google Scholar

  • Greenberg, Joseph H. 1990 [1978]. Generalizations about numeral systems. In Keith Denning & Suzanne Kemmer (eds.), On language. Selected writings of Joseph H. Greenberg, 271–309. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. [First published 1978 in Joseph H. Greenberg., Charles A. Ferguson & Edith A. Moravcsik (eds.), Universals of the human language, vol. 3: Word structure, 249–295. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.]Google Scholar

  • Gvozdanović, Jadranka. 1999. Numeral types and changes worldwide. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Her, One-Soon. 2012a. Distinguishing classifiers and measure words: A mathematical perspective and implications. Lingua 122(14). 1668–1691.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Her, One-Soon. 2012b. Structure of classifiers and measure words: A lexical functional account. Language and Linguistics 13. 1211–1251.Google Scholar

  • Her, One-Soon. 2017a. Deriving classifier word order typology, or Greenberg’s Universal 20A and Universal 20. Linguistics 55(2). 265–303.Google Scholar

  • Her, One-Soon. 2017b. Structure of numerals and classifiers in Chinese: Historical and typological perspectives and cross-linguistic implications. Language and Linguistics 18(1). 26–71.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Her, One-Soon, Ying-Chun Chen & Nia-Shin Yen. 2017. Mathematical values in the processing of Chinese numeral classifiers and measure words. PLOS ONE 12(9). 1–9.Google Scholar

  • Her, One-Soon, & Chen-Tien Hsieh. 2010. On the semantic distinction between classifiers and measure words in Chinese. Language and Linguistics 11(3). 527–551.Google Scholar

  • Hu, Houxuan. 1983. Jiaguwen heji [The great collection of the oracle inscriptions]. Beijing: China Social Sciences Publishing House.Google Scholar

  • Jacquesson, François. 2007. Kok-Borok. A short analysis. Hukumu, 10th anniversary volume, 109–122. Agartala: Kokborok Tei Hukumu Mission.Google Scholar

  • Joseph, Thatil Umbavu V. 2007. Rabha. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

  • Kondakov, Alexander. 2013. A sociolinguistic survey of the Rabha dialects of Meghalaya and Assam. Dallas: SIL international.Google Scholar

  • Luraghi, Silvia. 2011. The origin of the Proto-Indo-European gender system: Typological considerations. Folia Linguistica 45(2). 435–464.Google Scholar

  • Matisoff, James A. 1995. Sino-Tibetan numerals and the play of prefixes. Bulleting of the National Museum of Ethnology (Osaka) 20(1). 105–251.Google Scholar

  • Mazaudon, Martine. 2009. Number-building in Tibeto-Burman languages. In Stephen Morey & Mark W. Post (eds.), North East Indian linguistics, 117–148. Cambridge: Foundation Books.Google Scholar

  • Morev, Lev N. 2000. Some afterthoughts on classifiers in the Tai languages. Mon-Khmer Studies 30. 75–82.Google Scholar

  • Mortensen, David R. 2017. Hmong-Mien languages. In Mark Aronoff (ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of linguistics, 1–25. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Nomoto, Hiroki. 2013. Number in classifier languages (PhD dissertation). University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.Google Scholar

  • Peyraube, Alain. 1991. Some remarks on the history of Chinese classifiers. Santa Barbara Papers in Linguistics 3. 106–126.Google Scholar

  • Peyraube, Alain. 1998. On the history of classifiers in Archaic and Medieval Chinese. In Benjamin K. T’sou (ed.), Studia Linguistica Serica, 131–145. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar

  • Piantadosi, Steven T. & Edward Gibson. 2014. Quantitative standards for absolute linguistic universals. Cognitive Science 38(4). 736–756.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Seifart, Frank. 2010. Nominal classification. Language and Linguistics Compass 4(8). 719–736.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Senft, Gunter. 1986. Kilivila: The language of the Trobriand Islanders. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Senft, Gunter. 2000. What do we really know about nominal classification systems. In Gunter Senft (ed.), Systems of nominal classification, 11–49. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Simons, Gary F. & Charles D. Fennig (eds.). 2018. Ethnologue: Languages of the world (21st edition). Dallas, Tex.: SIL International. (http://www.ethnologue.com).

  • Sinnemäki, Kaius T. K. to appear. On the distribution and complexity of gender and numeral classifiers. In Francesca Di Garbo & Bernhard Wälchli (eds.), Grammatical gender and linguistic complexity. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar

  • Sullivan, Gail M. & Richard Feinn. 2012. Using effect size – or why the p value is not enough. Journal of Graduate Medical Education 4(3). 279–282.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tai, James & Lianqing Wang. 1990. A semantic study of the classifier tiao. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association 25(1). 35–56.Google Scholar

  • Velupillai, Viveka. 2012. An introduction to linguistic typology. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Wu, Fuxiang, Feng Shengli & Huang Zhengde. 2006. Hanyu shu+lianhg+ming geshi de laiyuan [On the origin of the construction of numeral+classifier+noun in Chinese]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese Language] 5. 387–400.Google Scholar

  • Xu, Dan 2013. Plurality and classifiers across languages in China. München: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Yi, Byeong-Uk. 2009. Chinese classifiers and count nouns. Journal of Cognitive Science 10. 209–225.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Yi, Byeong-Uk. 2011. What is a numeral classifier? Philosophical Analysis 23. 195–258.Google Scholar

  • Zhang, Niina Ning. 2013. Classifier structures in Mandarin Chinese. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2019-09-28

Published in Print: 2019-09-25


Citation Information: STUF - Language Typology and Universals, Volume 72, Issue 3, Pages 421–452, ISSN (Online) 2196-7148, ISSN (Print) 1867-8319, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/stuf-2019-0017.

Export Citation

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in