Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Studia Universitatis „Vasile Goldis” Arad – Economics Series

4 Issues per year

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …

The Bioeconomy Model in Future Sustainable Development

Nicolae Ipate / Katalin Gabriela David / Iudith Ipate / Alexandru Bogdan
Published Online: 2015-07-29 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sues-2015-0016


The future of sustainable development is the bioeconomy with the ―global‖ solution; both global and local action for developed the renewable energy generation. When local solutions are implemented is being laid for global solutions are positive affect the national economy. The implementation of the bioeconomy strategy used by society to prevent urgent problems, such as increasing competition for natural resources, climate change, rural sustainable development. The bioeconomy is a new economic and social order and promotes systemic change from using non-renewable resources to renewables. Bioeconomy reveals that production, which involves the transformation of a limited stock of matter and energy, but respecting the same laws that govern entropy closed systems, the entropy or unavailable matter and energy in the forms tend to increase continuously. Economic growth not only increases the apparent output per unit of inputs, which is performed using finite stock of matter and energy in the world. The current economy is based on fossil fuels and other material inputs suffering entropic degradation, both in the raw material extraction and pollution. The production, even if technical progress leads to lower overall yields. The idea of a steady state as the final economic growth that perpetuated indefinitely pendulum model is an impossibility

Keywords: eco-innovation; biomass; food security; rural development


  • 1. AT Bogdan, Ipate Iudith, Ecoeconomy and ecosanogenesis in Romania based of agrifood green power, Romanian Academy Editor 2012, ISBN 978-973-27-2264-0, 2012.Google Scholar

  • 2. Braat, LC & WFJ van Lierop, Integrated economic-ecological modeling, Elsevier Science Pub. Co., Amsterdam; New York 1987.Google Scholar

  • 3. Brookshire, DS, LA Brand, J Thacher, MD Dixon, K Benedict, JC Stromberg, K Lansey, D Goodrich, M McIntosh, J Grandy, S Stewart, C Broadbent & G Izon, Integrated modeling and ecological valuation: Applications in the semiarid southwest, paper presented at Workshop "Valuation for Environmental Policy: Ecological Benefits", Washington DC, April 23-24, 2007, 2007.Google Scholar

  • 4. Cai, X, DC McKinney & L Lasdon, An integrated hydrologic-agronomiceconomic model for river basin management, J Water Resour Plan Manage, 129(1), 4-17, 2003.Google Scholar

  • 5. Eggert, H, Bioeconomic analysis and management, Environ Resour Econ, 11(3), 399-411, 1998.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 6. Ewert, F, MK van Ittersum, I Bezlepkina, O Therond, E Andersen, H Belhouchette, C Bockstaller, F Brouwer, T Heckelei, S Janssen, R Knapen, M Kuiper, K Louhichi, JA Olsson, N Turpin, J Wery, JE Wien & J Wolf, A methodology for enhanced flexibility of integrated assessment in agriculture, Environ Sci Policy, 12(5), 546-561, 2009.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 7. Firth, C, The use of gross and net margins in the economic analysis of organic farms, paper presented at UK Organic Research 2002: Proceedings of the COR Conference, Aberystwyth, 26-28th March 2002, 26-28th March 2002, 2001.Google Scholar

  • 8. Gonzalez-Alvarez, Y, AG Keeler & JD Mullen, Farm-level irrigation and the marginal cost of water use: Evidence from Georgia, J Environ Manag, 80(4), 311-317, 2006.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 9. Grigalunas, T, JJ Opaluch & M Luo, The economic costs to fisheries from marine sediment disposal: Case study of providence, USA, Ecol Econ, 38(1), 47-58, 2001.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 10. Hanley, N & EB Barbier, Pricing nature. Cost-benefit analysis and environmental policy, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, 2009.Google Scholar

  • 11. Hazell, PBR & RD Norton, Mathematical programming for economic analysis in agriculture, Macmillan, 1986.Google Scholar

  • 12. Jula D., Jula N., 2010, Modelare economica. Modelele econometrice si de optimizare. Mustang, BucurestiGoogle Scholar

  • 13. OECD, The Political Economy of Environmentally Related Taxes, 2006, Paris, pp. 10 - 25 Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2015-04-01

Accepted: 2015-06-01

Published Online: 2015-07-29

Published in Print: 2015-07-01

Citation Information: Studia Universitatis „Vasile Goldis” Arad – Economics Series, Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages 115–123, ISSN (Online) 1584-2339, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sues-2015-0016.

Export Citation

© 2015. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in