Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
In This Section

Text & Talk

An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse & Communication Studies

Ed. by Sarangi, Srikant

6 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.448
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.686

CiteScore 2016: 0.63

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.644
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.508

Online
ISSN
1860-7349
See all formats and pricing
In This Section
Volume 28, Issue 6 (Jan 2008)

Issues

Stance and affect in conversation: On the interplay of sequential and phonetic resources

John Local
  • Corresponding author
  • John Local is Professor of Phonetics and Linguistics in the Department of Language and Linguistic Science at the University of York (UK).
/ Gareth Walker
  • Gareth Walker is Lecturer in Linguistics in the School of English Literature, Language and Linguistics at the University of Sheffield.
Published Online: 2008-12-01 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2008.037

Abstract

Linguists, and other analysts of discourse, regularly make appeal to affectual states in determining the meaning of utterances. We examine two kinds of sequence that occur in everyday conversation. The first involves one participant making an explicit lexical formulation of a co-participant's affectual state (e.g., ‘you sound happy’, ‘don't sound so depressed’). The second involves responses to ‘positive informings’ and ‘negative informings’. Through consideration of sequential organization, participant orientation, and phonetic detail, we suggest that the attribution of analytic categories of affect is problematic. We argue that phonetic characteristics which might be thought to be associated with affect may better be accounted for with reference to the management of particular sequential-interactional tasks. The finding that stance does not inhere in any single turn at talk or any single linguistic aspect leads us to suggest that future investigations into stance and affect will need to pay attention simultaneously to matters of both linguistic-phonetic and sequential organization.

Keywords:: stance; affect; conversation; sequence; phonetics; intonation

About the article

Department of Language and Linguistic Science, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK 〈


Published Online: 2008-12-01

Published in Print: 2008-11-01



Citation Information: Text & Talk - An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse Communication Studies, ISSN (Online) 1860-7349, ISSN (Print) 1860-7330, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2008.037. Export Citation

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Richard Ogden
Research on Language and Social Interaction, 2015, Volume 48, Number 3, Page 271
[2]
Andrea Golato
Research on Language & Social Interaction, 2012, Volume 45, Number 3, Page 245
[3]
Israel Berger
Journal of Pragmatics, 2013, Volume 57, Page 173
[5]
Beatrice Szczepek Reed
Cultural Studies of Science Education, 2010, Volume 5, Number 4, Page 859
[6]
Rebecca Clift
Research on Language and Social Interaction, 2014, Volume 47, Number 4, Page 380
[7]
Aino Koivisto
Discourse Processes, 2015, Volume 52, Number 2, Page 111
[8]
Valerie Freeman
Journal of Phonetics, 2014, Volume 45, Page 1
[9]
Traci Walker
Research on Language and Social Interaction, 2014, Volume 47, Number 1, Page 1
[11]
Trevor Benjamin and Traci Walker
Discourse Processes, 2013, Volume 50, Number 2, Page 107

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in