Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details

Text & Talk

An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse & Communication Studies

Ed. by Sarangi, Srikant


IMPACT FACTOR 2015: 0.477
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.635

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2014: 0.657
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2014: 0.907
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2014: 0.509

Online
ISSN
1860-7349
See all formats and pricing



Select Volume and Issue

Issues

A study of interruption in Chinese criminal courtroom discourse

Meizhen Liao1

1Professor of linguistics in the School of Foreign Languages, Huazhong Normal University.

School of Foreign Languages, Huazhong Normal University, Wuhan 430079, PR China 〈 〉.

Citation Information: Text & Talk - An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse Communication Studies. Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages 175–199, ISSN (Online) 1860-7349, ISSN (Print) 1860-7330, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2009.008, March 2009

Publication History

Published Online:
2009-03-18

Abstract

This article is based on a corpus of transcripts of four criminal courtroom trials in China. It investigates interruption in the Chinese criminal courtroom discourse as a highly institutionalized and strongly goal-oriented discourse. The study focuses on the number, functions, causes, and distribution of interruptions as well as their correlation with the Chinese legal system and legal culture. Interruptions in Chinese courtroom trials are substantially asymmetrical in terms of the number, functions, and causes in the sense that prosecutors interrupt the most and defense lawyers the least, with judges being in the middle but somewhat closer to prosecutors. A defendant is the most interrupted party. The dominant side, represented by the judge and the prosecutor, interrupts to exercise control by stretching the Gricean maxims to the extreme. In contrast, a defendant interrupts mainly for cooperation or to insist on their right to speak. I also attempt to explain the imbalance by referring to the Chinese judicial system and legal culture and compare the interruption phenomena in Chinese criminal trials with those I observed in the United States.

Keywords:: interruption; criminal courtroom discourse; Chinese legal system and culture; discourse analysis

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Bin Liang, Ni Phil He, and Hong Lu
Crime, Law and Social Change, 2014, Volume 62, Number 5, Page 585

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.