Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Text & Talk

An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse & Communication Studies

Ed. by Sarangi, Srikant

6 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 0.426
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.724

CiteScore 2017: 0.63

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.326
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.625

Online
ISSN
1860-7349
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 30, Issue 4

Issues

Learning in the contingency of talk-in-interaction

Yo-An Lee
  • Corresponding author
  • Faculty member in the English Department at Sogang University, Seoul, in South Korea.
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2010-07-22 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2010.020

Abstract

This article offers a critical examination of the recent initiative that considers developmental issues to be an important agenda in CA-based studies (Brouwer and Wagner, Journal of Applied Linguistics 1: 29–47, 2004; Firth and Wagner, Modern Language Journal 91: 800–819, 2007). This initiative seems to take a narrower view of learning than what natural interactional details in CA studies allow us to see. Spoken interactions are not always stable enough to demarcate the objects of learning for theoretical predictions or pedagogical prescriptions, particularly when seen in reference to contingent pragmatic actions enacted in discourse-in-interaction. The contingency of interaction has to be treated as central if we want to recover learning as the participants experience it. This paper proposes that if the contingency of interactional details is treated as being analytically central, CA research can still tell us very useful things about the phenomena of learning because it can recover the participants' contingent sense-making practices through which the task of learning is discovered, acted on, and realized. This point is demonstrated through a close analysis of two excerpts from English as Second Language (ESL) classroom interaction.

Keywords:: conversation analysis; ethnomethodology; classroom interaction; contingency; English as a second language; talk-in-interaction; learning

About the article

British & American Language & Literature, Culture, Sogang University, Shinsu-Dong 1, Mapo-Gu, Seoul, Korea 〈


Published Online: 2010-07-22

Published in Print: 2010-07-01


Citation Information: Text & Talk - An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse & Communication Studies, Volume 30, Issue 4, Pages 403–422, ISSN (Online) 1860-7349, ISSN (Print) 1860-7330, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2010.020.

Export Citation

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[3]
Fatemeh Mozaffari and Hamid Allami
Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2017, Volume 20, Number 1, Page 151
[9]
나지영 and 이요안
Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics, 2015, Volume 15, Number 2, Page 203
[13]
Søren W. Eskildsen and GuÐrún Theodórsdóttir
Applied Linguistics, 2017, Volume 38, Number 2, Page 143
[14]
Yo-An Lee and Akihiko Takahashi
Human Studies, 2011, Volume 34, Number 2, Page 209
[16]
Fredrik Rusk, Michaela Pörn, Fritjof Sahlström, and Anna Slotte-Lüttge
International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 2015, Volume 38, Number 1, Page 39
[17]
Doris Dippold
The Modern Language Journal, 2014, Volume 98, Number 1, Page 402
[18]
Yo-An Lee and John Hellermann
TESOL Quarterly, 2014, Volume 48, Number 4, Page 763
[19]
Yo-An Lee
The Modern Language Journal, 2013, Volume 97, Number 4, Page 853
[20]
Teppo Jakonen and Tom Morton
Applied Linguistics, 2015, Volume 36, Number 1, Page 73
[21]
Ali Reza Majlesi and Mathias Broth
Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 2012, Volume 1, Number 3-4, Page 193

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in