Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Text & Talk

An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse & Communication Studies

Ed. by Sarangi, Srikant


IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 0.400
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.750

CiteScore 2018: 0.61

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.305
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.670

Online
ISSN
1860-7349
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 34, Issue 5

Issues

“Christians” and “bad Christians”: categorization in atheist user talk on YouTube

Stephen Pihlaja
Published Online: 2014-08-29 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2014-0020

Abstract

This article presents an investigation of the use of social categories in talk about Christians in a small community of users discussing religious issues on the popular video-sharing site, YouTube. The article focuses on how self-proclaimed atheists employed and modified the category of “Christian” to describe others in a series of antagonistic debates – called “drama” by users. Three video pages, including video talk and comments, were analyzed using membership categorization analysis (Housley and Fitzgerald 2002) to focus on how users, and in particular atheists, employed and modified the category of “Christian” to talk about others. The analysis shows the category of “Christian” was used in different ways to evaluate the actions of others, often leading to conflict about the use of the category. The study shows how the meaning of categories is dynamic in talk, and how local, specific uses emerged as stable on different timescales in the drama. Findings also show that categorization often revealed user beliefs and expectations about social interaction, particularly when the categorization led to moral judgments.

Keywords: computer-mediated communication; membership categorization analysis; community; conversation analysis; YouTube

About the article

Stephen Pihlaja

Stephen Pihlaja is Senior Lecturer in Stylistics at Newman University in Birmingham, UK. His interests include stylistics, metaphor, computer-mediated communication, and religious studies. His monograph Antagonism on YouTube: Metaphor in Online Discourse (Bloomsbury Academic) explores a single instance of YouTube “drama” in a community of Christians and atheists arguing online.


Published Online: 2014-08-29

Published in Print: 2014-09-01


Citation Information: Text & Talk, Volume 34, Issue 5, Pages 623–639, ISSN (Online) 1860-7349, ISSN (Print) 1860-7330, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2014-0020.

Export Citation

©2014 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Maryanne Theobald, Gillian Busch, and Susan Danby
Global Studies of Childhood, 2018, Page 204361061879893
[2]
Ilkka Arminen, Otto EA Segersven, and Mika Simonen
Acta Sociologica, 2018, Page 000169931878636
[3]
Stephen Pihlaja
Language and Literature, 2016, Volume 25, Number 3, Page 226
[4]
Trena Paulus, Amber Warren, and Jessica Nina Lester
Discourse, Context & Media, 2016, Volume 12, Page 1

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in