Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Text & Talk

An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse & Communication Studies

Ed. by Sarangi, Srikant


IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 0.400
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.750

CiteScore 2018: 0.61

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.305
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.670

Online
ISSN
1860-7349
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 35, Issue 2

Issues

Supervision at the outline stage: introducing and encountering issues of sustainable development through academic writing assignments

Ann-Marie Eriksson
  • Corresponding author
  • Department of Applied IT, Division for Language and Communication, Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Åsa Mäkitalo
Published Online: 2015-02-27 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2014-0032

Abstract

Universities are responsible for introducing students to disciplinary fields and their knowledge traditions. A common way to cater for processes of this kind is to organize students’ work through the production of text in a genre common in their field. Previous research has pointed to the challenges involved as students appropriate disciplinary ways of reasoning through writing, yet further attention needs to be directed to the communicative challenges involved at the very beginning of the process. Based on 14 video-recorded face-to-face encounters between environmental experts and individual MSc Engineering students, this study focuses on supervision at the outline stage of producing a report, and explores it as a communicative practice. The results from our study show how the students’ outline documents functioned as resources for separating the performing of a study from the crafting of its textual presentation. The results also illuminate, in detail, how access points to disciplinary reasoning and arguing were introduced through verbal discourse.

Keywords: writing process; higher education; mediation; genre; discourse; communication

References

  • Bakhtin, Michail M. 1986. Speech genres and other late essays. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

  • Bazerman, Charles. 1997a. Discursively structured activities . Mind, Culture, and Activity 4(4). 296–308.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bazerman, Charles. 1997b. The life of genre, the life in the classroom. In Wendy Bishop & Hans Ostrom (eds.), Genre and writing: Issues, arguments, alternatives, 19–26. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.Google Scholar

  • Bazerman, Charles. 2012. Genre as social action. In James Paul Gee & Michael Handford (eds.), The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis, 226–238. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Dressen-Hammouda, Dacia. 2008. From novice to disciplinary expert: Disciplinary identity and genre mastery . English for Specific Purposes 27. 233–252.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dysthe, Olga. 2002. Professors as mediators of academic text cultures . Written Communication 19(4). 493–544.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dysthe, Olga. 2012. Multivoiced classrooms in higher education academic writing. In Montserrat Castellò & Christiane Donahue (eds.), University writing: Selves and texts in academic societies, 201–216. Bingley: Emerald Group.Google Scholar

  • Dysthe, Olga, Akylina Samara & Kariane Westheim. 2006. Multivoiced supervision of master’s students: A case study of alternative supervision practices in higher education . Studies in Higher Education 31(3). 299–318.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ivanic, Roz. 1998. Writing and identity: The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Ivarsson, Jonas, Jonas Linderoth & Roger Säljö. 2009. Representations in practices, a sociocultural approach to multimodality in reasoning. In Carey Jewitt (ed.), The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis, 201–212. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Jordan, Brigitte & Austin Henderson. 1995. Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice . The Journal of the Learning Sciences 4(1). 39–103.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Linell, Per. 1998. Approaching dialogue: Talk, interaction and contexts in dialogical perspectives. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Paré, Anthony. 2011. Speaking of writing: Supervisory feedback and the dissertation. In Lynn McAlpine & Cheryl Amundsen (eds.), Doctoral education: Research-based strategies for doctoral students, supervisors and administrators, 59–74. Springer Science + Business Media http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-007-0507-4_4 (accessed 7 January 2013).

  • Paré, Anthony, Doreen Starke-Meyerring & Lynn McAlpine. 2011. Knowledge and identity work in the supervision of doctoral student writing: Shaping rhetorical subjects. In Doreen Starke-Meyerring, Anthony Paré, Natasha Artemeva, Miriam Horne & Larissa Yousoubova (eds.), Writing in knowledge societies, 215–236. Fort Collins, CO: The WAC Clearinghouse and Parlor Press.Google Scholar

  • Park, Innhwa. 2012. Seeking advice: Epistemic asymmetry and learner autonomy in writing conferences . Journal of Pragmatics 44(14). 2004–2021.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Prior, Paul. 1998. Writing/disciplinarity: A sociohistoric account of literate activity in the academy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Prior, Paul. 2006. A sociocultural theory of writing. In Charle A. MacArthur, Steven Graham & Jill Fitzgerald (eds.), Handbook of writing research, 54–66. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar

  • Säljö, R. 2009. Learning, theories of learning, and units of analysis in research . Educational Psychologist 44(3). 202–208.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Svinhufvud, Kimmo & Sanna Vehviläinen. 2013. Papers, documents, and the opening of an academic supervision encounter . Text & Talk 33(1). 139–166.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Vehviläinen, Sanna. 2009a. Problems in the research problem: Critical feedback and resistance in academic supervision . Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 53(2). 185–201.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Vehviläinen, Sanna. 2009b. Student-initiated advice in academic supervision . Research on Language and Social Interaction 42(2). 163–190.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Vehviläinen, Sanna. 2012. Question-prefaced advice in feedback sequences of Finnish academic supervisions. In Holger Limberg & Miriam A. Locher (eds.), Advice in discourse, 31–52. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Vygotsky, L. S. 1978. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

  • Wertsch, James V. 2007. Mediation. In Harry Daniels, Michael Cole & James V. Wertsch (eds.), The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky, 178–192. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Wertsch, James V. & Sibel Kazak. 2011. Saying more than you know in instructional settings. In Timothy Koschmann (ed.), Theories of learning and studies of instructional practice, 153–166. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

About the article

Ann-Marie Eriksson

Ann-Marie Eriksson is MA with The Linnaeus Centre for Research on Learning, Interaction and Mediated Communication in Contemporary Society (LinCS), University of Gothenburg, Sweden, and the Division for Language and Communication, Chalmers University of Technology. Her research focus concerns academic writing in higher education, with a particular interest in text production as a communicative practice and socialization of knowledge.

Åsa Mäkitalo

Åsa Mäkitalo is Professor in Education at the University of Gothenburg. She is co-director of LinCS, a Centre of Excellence conducting research on learning, interaction and IT. She is also Head of The University of Gothenburg LETStudio, engaging in issues of technologies and the transformation of expertise, on the social organization of learning and knowing, and forms of participation in knowledge practices across domains.


Published Online: 2015-02-27

Published in Print: 2015-03-01


Citation Information: Text & Talk, Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages 123–153, ISSN (Online) 1860-7349, ISSN (Print) 1860-7330, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2014-0032.

Export Citation

©2015 by De Gruyter Mouton.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
RachelleEsterhazy
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2018, Volume 43, Number 8, Page 1302
[2]
Janna Meyer-Beining, Sylvi Vigmo, and Åsa Mäkitalo
Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 2018
[3]
Rola Ajjawi and David Boud
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2018, Page 1

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in