Aoki, H. 1986. Evidentials in Japanese. In W. Chafe & J. Nicholas (eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology, 223–239. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar

Biber, D. & E. Finegan. 1988. Adverbial stance types in English. Discourse Processes 11(1). 1–34.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Biber, D. & E. Finegan. 1989. Styles of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect. Text 9(1). 93–124.Google Scholar

Bybee, J. 1985. Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

De Haan, F. 1999. Evidentiality and epistemic modality: Setting boundaries. Southwest Journal of Linguistics 18. 83–101.Google Scholar

Dorfmuller-Karpusa, K. 1990. Intensity markers. Journal of Pragmatics 14(3). 476–483.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Du Bois, J. 2007. The stance triangle. In R. Englebretson (ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction, 139–182. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Englebretson, R. 2007. Stancetaking in discourse: An introduction. In R. Englebretson (ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction, 1–26. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Haga, Y. 1954. “Chinjutsu” to wa nanimono? [What is Chinjutsu?]. Kokugo Kokubun 23(4). 47–61.Google Scholar

Haiman, J. 1983. Iconic and economic motivation. Language 59(4). 781–819.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Heritage, J. & G. Raymond. 2005. The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly 68(1). 15–38.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Hinds, J. 1986. Japanese. Dover, NH: Croom Helm.Google Scholar

Ishida, K. 2006. How can you be so certain? The use of hearsay evidentials by English-speaking learners of Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 38. 1281–1304.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Iwasaki, S. 2002. Japanese. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Kim, Y-J. & D. Biber. 1994. A corpus-based analysis of register variation in Korean. In D. Biber & E. Finegan (eds.), Sociolinguistic perspectives on register. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kinsui, S. 2003. Baacharu nihongo: Yakuwarigo no nazo [virtual Japanese: the mystery of role-language]. Tokyo: Iwanami.Google Scholar

Kullavanijaya, P. 1997. Verb intensifying devices in Bangkok Thai. In A.S, Abramson (ed.), Southeast Asian linguistics studies in honor of Vichin Panupong, 147–152. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.Google Scholar

Kuno, S. 1972. Functional sentence perspective: A case study from Japanese and English. Linguistic Inquiry 3. 269–320.Google Scholar

Lyons, J. 1977. Semantics. (2 vols) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Maynard, S. 1985. Choice of predicate and narrative manipulation: Function of Dearu and da in modern Japanese fiction. Poetics 14. 369–385.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Mushin, I. 2001. Evidentiality and epistemological stance: Narrative retelling. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Nagano, M. 1972. Bunshoogen shoosetsu. Tokyo: Asakura shoten.Google Scholar

Narahara, T. 2002. The Japanese copula: Forms and functions. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Ochs, E. 1996. Linguistic resources for socializing humanity. In J. Gumperz & S. Levinson (eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity, 407–437. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Palmer, F. R. 1986. Mood and modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Stubbs, M. 1986. A matter of prolonged fieldwork: Notes towards a modal grammar of English. Applied Linguistics 7. 1–25.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Tanaka, A. 2001. Kindai nihongo no bunpoo to hyoogen [grammar and expressions in contemporary Japanese language]. Tokyo: Meiji shoin.Google Scholar

Thompson, G. & S. Hunston. 2000. Evaluation: An introduction. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (eds.), Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse, 1–27. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Thompson, S. & A. Mulac. 1991. A quantitative perspective on the grammaticization of epistemic parentheticals in English. In E. C. Traugott & B. Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization (vol. 2), 313–329. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Tokieda, M. 1950. Nihon bumpoo koogo hen [japanese grammar – the spoken language]. Tokyo: Iwanami shoten.Google Scholar

Traugott, E. 1989. On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 65(1). 31–55.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Trent, N. 1997. Linguistic coding of evidentiality in Japanese spoken discourse and Japanese politeness, PhD dissertation. Austin, TX: University of Texas at Austin Press.Google Scholar

Tsujimura, T. 1960. Ima no buntai to korekara no buntai [present writing style and the future writing style]. Gengo Seikatsu 9. 16–25.Google Scholar

Uehara, T. 2003. A diachronic perspective on prototypicality: The case of nominal adjectives in Japanese. In H. Cuyckens, R. Dirven & J. Taylor (eds.), Cognitive approaches to lexical semantics, 363–392. Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Watanabe, M. 1953. Jojutsu to chinjutsu. Jutsugo bunsetsu no koozoo [internal and external predication. The structure of predicative phrases]. Kokugogaku 13(/14). 20–34.Google Scholar

Yamaguchi, N. 2006. Nihongo no rekishi [Japanese language history]. Tokyo: Iwanami shoten.Google Scholar

Yamazaki, Y. 1958. Gendaigo no bumpoo [modern language grammar]. Tokyo: Musashino shoin.Google Scholar

Yoshida, K. 1971. Gendaigo jodooshi no shiteki kenkyuu [historical study of auxiliaries in the contemporary language]. Tokyo: Meiji shoin.Google Scholar