Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Text & Talk

An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse & Communication Studies

Ed. by Sarangi, Srikant

6 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.448
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.686

CiteScore 2016: 0.63

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.644
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.508

Online
ISSN
1860-7349
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 35, Issue 3 (May 2015)

Issues

Topical themes and thematic progression: the “picture” of research articles

Leong Ping Alvin
Published Online: 2015-04-24 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2015-0001

Abstract

Although much has been written about the features of academic writing, there is a lack of research attention on macro issues related to the development of ideas, particularly in the writing of research articles. A concept that is useful in investigating such issues is the Hallidayan notion of theme. However, the thematic structure of research articles has received only modest attention over the years. It is also rare for thematic diagrams to be used even though they can be helpful in clarifying the thematic structure of the text. In this exploratory study, the patterning of topical themes in research articles was investigated using a diagrammatic approach. Twenty biology-related research articles were divided into t-units and analyzed for topical themes. Thematic diagrams were generated for all the articles. The diagrams revealed a progressive thematic pattern in the introduction sections of all the articles. At the whole-text level, an anchored-development pattern was observed in the majority of the articles. These findings suggest that research articles at the macro level share similarities in their thematic structure. They also shed light on how authors achieve focus in the writing through the systematic use of clause-initial elements.

Keywords: theme; thematic progression; research articles; academic writing; biology

References

  • Bailey, Stephen. 2011. Academic writing: A handbook for international students, 3rd edn. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Bawarshi, Anis S. & Mary Jo Reiff. 2010. Genre: An introduction to history, theory, research, and pedagogy. West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press, WAC Clearinghouse.Google Scholar

  • Breakthrough of the year. 2014. http://news.sciencemag.org/scientific-community/2014/12/breakthrough-year-top-10-scientific-achievements-2014 (accessed 22 December 2014).

  • Christie, Frances. 2007. Ongoing dialogue: Functional linguistic and Bernstein sociological perspectives on education. In Frances Christie & James R. Martin (eds.), Language, knowledge, and pedagogy: Functional linguistic and sociological perspectives, 3–13. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

  • Craswell, Gail & Megan Poore. 2012. Writing for academic success, 2nd edn. London: Sage.Google Scholar

  • Daneš, František. 1970. One instance of Prague school methodology: Functional analysis of utterance and text. In P. L. Garvin (ed.), Method and theory in linguistics, 132–140. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

  • Daneš, František. 1974. Functional sentence perspective and the organization of the text. In František Daneš (ed.), Papers on functional sentence perspective, 106–128. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

  • Dubois, Betty Lou. 1987. A reformulation of thematic progression typology. Text 7(2). 89–116.Google Scholar

  • First-time enrollment of international graduate students up 8 percent. 8 November 2012. http://www.cgsnet.org/first-time-enrollment-international-graduate-students-8-percent (accessed 12 May 2013).

  • Fries, Peter H. & Gillian Francis. 1992. Exploring theme: Problems for research. Occasional Papers in Systemic Linguistics 6. 45–59.Google Scholar

  • Halliday, Michael A. K. 1994. An introduction to functional grammar, 2nd edn. London: Arnold.Google Scholar

  • Halliday, Michael A. K. & Ruqaiya Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar

  • Halliday, Michael A. K. & Christian M. I. M Matthiessen. 2014. Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar, 4th edn. Oxfordshire: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Harris, David P. 1990. The use of “organizing sentences” in the structure of paragraphs in science textbooks. In Ulla Connor & Ann M. Johns (eds.), Coherence in writing: Research and pedagogical perspectives, 67–86. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.Google Scholar

  • Harris, Michael. 2012. Do androids prove theorems in their sleep? In Apostolos Doxiadis & Barry Mazur (eds.), Circles disturbed: The interplay of mathematics and narrative, 130–182. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

  • Hasan, Ruqaiya. 1984. Coherence and cohesive harmony. In James Flood (ed.), Understanding reading comprehension, 181–219. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.Google Scholar

  • Hunt, Kellogg. 1965. Grammatical structures written at three grade levels. Champaign, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar

  • Hyland, Ken. 2000. Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. London: Longman.Google Scholar

  • Hyland, Ken. 2008. As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. English for Specific Purposes 27(1). 4–21.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hyland, Ken & Marina Bondi (eds.). 2006. Academic discourse across disciplines. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

  • Jalilifar, A. R. 2010. The status of theme in applied linguistics articles. Asian ESP Journal 6(2). 7–39.Google Scholar

  • Journal citation reports. 2013. http://wokinfo.com/products_tools/analytical/jcr/ (accessed 22 December 2014).

  • Kanoksilapatham, Budsaba. 2005. Rhetorical structure of biochemistry research articles. English for Specific Purposes 24(3). 269–292.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Laurens, Amanda. 2007. Scientific writing skills: Guidelines for writing theses and dissertations. Stellenbosch: Sun Press.Google Scholar

  • Leong, Ping Alvin. 2004. Theme and rheme: An alternative account. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

  • Leong, Ping Alvin. 2005. Talking themes: The thematic structure of talk. Discourse Studies 7(6). 701–732.Google Scholar

  • Martin, James R. 1992. English text: System and structure. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • McCabe, Anne M. 1999. Theme and thematic patterns in Spanish and English history texts. Birmingham: Aston University PhD thesis.Google Scholar

  • North, Sarah. 2005. Different values, different skills? A comparison of essay writing by students from arts and science backgrounds. Studies in Higher Education 30(5). 517–533.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nwogu, Kevin & Thomas Bloor. 1991. Thematic progression in professional and popular medical texts. In Eija Ventola (ed.), Functional and systemic linguistics: Approaches and uses, 369–384. Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Parsons, Gerald. 1991. Cohesion coherence: Scientific texts. In Eija Ventola (ed.), Functional and systemic linguistics: Approaches and uses, 415–429. Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Phakiti, Aek & Lulu Li. 2011. General academic difficulties and reading and writing difficulties among Asian ESL postgraduate students in TESOL at an Australian university. RELC Journal 42(3). 227–264.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Postgraduate research program. 2013. http://sydney.edu.au/stuserv/learning_centre/pgradjun+jul.shtml (accessed 9 May 2013).

  • Rogers, Sandra H. 2004. Evaluating textual coherence: A case study of university business writing by EFL and native English-speaking students in New Zealand. RELC Journal 35(2). 135–147.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Samraj, B. 2005. An exploration of a genre set: Research article abstracts and introductions in two disciplines. English for Specific Purposes 24. 141–156.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Swales, John M. 1981. Aspects of article introductions. Birmingham: Aston University.Google Scholar

  • Swales, John M. 1990. Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Swales, John M. & Christine B Feak. 2004. Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills, 2nd edn. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

  • Williams, Ian A. 1999. Results sections of medical research articles: Analysis of rhetorical categories for pedagogical purposes. English for Specific Purposes 18(4). 347–366.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Williams, Joseph M. 2000. Style: Ten lessons in clarity and grace, 6th edn. New York: Longman.Google Scholar

  • Williams, Ian A. 2009. Discourse style and theme–rheme progression in biomedical research article discussions. Languages in Contrast 9(2). 225–266.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Yates, Simeon J., Noel Williams & Ann-Florence Dujardin. 2005. Writing geology: Key communication competencies for geoscience. Planet 15. 36–41.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zmrzlá, Petra. 2013. Co-referential cohesive chains in research articles. Brno: Masaryk University PhD dissertation.Google Scholar

About the article

Leong Ping Alvin

Leong Ping Alvin lectures at the Language and Communication Centre, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. He obtained his PhD degree from the National University of Singapore in 2001 under a research scholarship. His book-length publications include Transforming Literacies and Language (co-editor; Continuum, 2011) and Theme and Rheme (Peter Lang, 2004). His research interests are in systemic-functional grammar, discourse analysis, and literacy studies.


Published Online: 2015-04-24

Published in Print: 2015-05-01


Citation Information: Text & Talk, ISSN (Online) 1860-7349, ISSN (Print) 1860-7330, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2015-0001.

Export Citation

©2015 by De Gruyter Mouton. Copyright Clearance Center

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in