Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Text & Talk

An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse & Communication Studies

Ed. by Sarangi, Srikant


IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 0.400
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.750

CiteScore 2018: 0.61

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.305
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.670

Online
ISSN
1860-7349
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 35, Issue 6

Issues

Source marking in represented talk and thought in Vietnamese narratives

Hanh thi Nguyen
Published Online: 2015-11-28 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2015-0019

Abstract

This paper uses conversation analysis to examine when Vietnamese speakers explicitly mark the source of represented talk or thought (RT) and when they may omit the RTs source in narratives in dyadic and multiparty family conversations. In Vietnamese, a pro-drop, non-inflectional language, RTs may be introduced by a verb of speaking and its subject, a verb of speaking without the subject, or no verb of speaking and no subject. The analysis focuses on how these three choices are employed in the sequential organization of narrative series, narrative participation frameworks, and narrative dramatization. The findings contribute to current understandings about source marking through linguistic devices as an interactional practice in conversations in addition to other resources such as voicing and embodied actions.

Keywords: narrative; reported speech; Vietnamese; family; conversation analysis

References

  • Bolden, Galina B. 2004. The quote and beyond: Defining boundaries of reported speech in conversational Russian. Journal of Pragmatics 36. 1071–1118.Google Scholar

  • Coulmas, Florian. 1986. Reported speech: Some general issues. In Florian Coulmas (ed.), Direct and indirect speech, 1–18. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. 1998. Coherent voicing: On prosody in conversational reported speech. InLiST: Interaction and linguistic structures 1. 1–28.Google Scholar

  • Goffman, Erving. 1981. Forms of talk. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

  • Goodwin, Marjorie H. 1990. He-said-she-said: Talk as social organization among black children. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

  • Günthner, Susanne. 1999. Polyphony and the layering of voices in reported dialogs: An analysis of the use of prosodic devices in everyday reported speech. Journal of Pragmatics 31. 695–708.Google Scholar

  • Hoàng, Phê. 1994. Từ điển tiếng Việt [Vietnamese dictionary], 3rd edn. Hà Nội: Nhà Xuất Bản Khoa Học Xã Hội – Trung Tâm Từ Điển Học.Google Scholar

  • Holt, Elizabeth. 1996. Reporting on talk: The use of direct reported speech in conversations. Research on Language and Social Interaction 29(3). 219–245.Google Scholar

  • Holt, Elizabeth. 2007. “I’m eyeing your chopped up mind”: Reporting and enacting. In Elizabeth Holt & Rebecca Cliff (eds.), Reporting talk: Reported speech in interaction, 47–80. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Klewitz, Gabriele & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen. 1999. Quote-unquote: The role of prosody in the contextualization of reported speech sequences. Pragmatics 9(4). 459–485.Google Scholar

  • Kuo, Sai-Hua. 2001. Reported speech in Chinese political discourse. Discourse Studies 3(2). 181–202.Google Scholar

  • Lee, Duck-Young & Yoko Yonezawa. 2008. The role of the overt expression of first and second person subject in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 40. 733–767.Google Scholar

  • Mathis, Terrie & George Yule. 1994. Zero quotatives. Discourse Processes 18. 63–76.Google Scholar

  • McGregor, William. 1994. The grammar of reported speech and thought in Gooniyandi. Journal of Linguistics 1(4). 63–92.Google Scholar

  • Park, Yujong. 2009. Interaction between grammar and multimodal resources: Quoting different characters in Korean multiparty conversation. Discourse Studies 11(1). 79–104.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff & Gail Jefferson. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn taking for conversation. Language 50(4). 696–735.Google Scholar

  • Stivers, Tanya. 2008. Stance, affiliation, and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation. Research on Language & Social Interaction 41(1). 31–57.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

About the article

Hanh thi Nguyen

Hanh thi Nguyen (Ph.D., University of Wisconsin-Madison) is associate professor of applied linguistics at Hawai‘i Pacific University, USA. Her publications include Talk-in-interaction: Multilingual perspectives (coedited with Gabriele Kasper), Developing interactional competence: A conversation analytic study of patient consultations in pharmacy, and various articles and book chapters on interactional competence, the construction of social relationships in talk-in-interaction, and Vietnamese applied linguistics.


Published Online: 2015-11-28

Published in Print: 2015-12-01


Citation Information: Text & Talk, Volume 35, Issue 6, Pages 731–757, ISSN (Online) 1860-7349, ISSN (Print) 1860-7330, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2015-0019.

Export Citation

©2015 by De Gruyter Mouton.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Innhwa Park
Journal of Pragmatics, 2018, Volume 129, Page 1
[2]
Thoai Nu-Linh Ton
Language and Linguistics, 2018, Volume 19, Number 1, Page 196

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in