Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Text & Talk

An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse & Communication Studies

Ed. by Sarangi, Srikant


IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 0.400
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.750

CiteScore 2018: 0.61

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.305
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.670

Online
ISSN
1860-7349
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 35, Issue 6

Issues

Reconstructing misinterpretation and misrepresentation through represented talk in Korean conversation

Mary Shin Kim
  • Corresponding author
  • Department of East Asian Languages and Literatures, University of Hawaii at Manoa, 1890 East-West Road, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2015-11-28 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2015-0021

Abstract

Drawing from a corpus of telephone and face-to-face Korean conversational data, this study investigates cases of represented talk (RT) that routinely occur in second position as a response to a prior turn that the speaker finds problematic and in need of repair. The speaker finds problems in the way the recipient interprets or represents certain events, situations, or the interlocutors themselves, and the speaker seeks to rectify these (mis)conceptions and (mis)representations through RT. The speaker reports a former locution, which demonstrates the recipient’s understanding to be incorrect or insufficient. At such delicate interactional junctures, the speaker begins a quote as direct reported speech (DRS) and closes the same quote as indirect reported speech (IRS). The unique design of combining DRS and IRS allows Korean speakers to negotiate what to show (DRS) and what to tell (IRS) according to the importance and relevance of the current interaction and current recipients. The study further discusses why this particular design of RT is readily observed in Korean conversation and how it fits within its interactional task of reconstructing matters according to the speaker’s perspective.

Keywords: direct reported speech; free indirect speech; indirect quotative construction; misinterpretation; misrepresentation; Korean

References

  • Banfield, Ann. 1982. Unspeakable sentences: Narration and representation in the language of fiction. Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

  • Bolden, Galina. 2009. Beyond answering: Repeat-prefaced responses conversation. Communication Monographs 76(2). 121–143.Google Scholar

  • Chafe, Wallace. 1982. Integration and involvement in speaking, writing and oral literature. In Deborah Tannen (ed.), Spoken and written language: Exploring orality and literacy, 35–53. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar

  • Clark, Herbert H. & Richard J. Gerrig. 1990. Quotation as demonstrations. Language 66(4). 764–805.Google Scholar

  • Clayman, Steven. 2007. Speaking on behalf of the public in broadcast news interviews. In Elizabeth Holt & Rebecca Clift (eds.), Reporting talk: Reported speech in interaction, 221–243. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Clift, Rebecca. 2007. Getting there first: Non-narrative reported speech in interaction. In Elizabeth Holt & Rebecca Clift (eds.), Reporting talk: Reported speech in interaction, 120–149. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Coulmas, Florian (ed.). 1986. Direct and indirect speech. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. 2007. Assessing and accounting. In Elizabeth Holt & Rebecca Clift (eds.), Reporting talk: Reported speech in interaction, 81–119. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Galatolo, Renata. 2007. Active voicing in court. In Elizabeth Holt & Rebecca Clift (eds.), Reporting talk: Reported speech in interaction, 195–220. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Goodwin, Charles. 2007. Interactive footing. In Elizabeth Holt & Rebecca Clift (eds.), Reporting talk: Reported speech in interaction, 16–46. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Heritage, John & Geoffrey Raymond. 2005. The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly 68(1). 15–38.Google Scholar

  • Holt, Elizabeth. 1996. Reporting on talk: The use of direct reported speech in conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction 29. 219–245.Google Scholar

  • Holt, Elizabeth. 2000. Reporting and reacting: Concurrent responses to reported speech. Research on Language and Social Interaction 33. 425–454.Google Scholar

  • Holt, Elizabeth & Rebecca Clift (eds.). 2007. Reporting talk: Reported speech in interaction. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Jefferson, Gail. 1979. A technique for inviting laughter and its subsequent acceptance/declination. In George Psathas (ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology, 79–96. New York: Irvington.Google Scholar

  • Jefferson, Gail. 1984. Transcript notation. In J. Maxwell Atkinson & John Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis, ix–xvi. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Kim, Hye-Ri S. 2011. Beginning an action in English and Korean: Turn design and action projection. Unpublished dissertation. Los Angeles: University of California.Google Scholar

  • Kim, Mary S. 2011. Negotiating epistemic rights to information in Korean conversation: An examination of the Korean evidential marker –tamye. Discourse Studies 13(4). 435–459.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Kim, Mary S. 2015. The complexity and variability of self-deprecation in Korean conversation. Pragmatics and Society 6(3). 398–420.Google Scholar

  • Labov, William. 1972. Language in the inner city. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

  • Lee, Sang-Bok. 1983. Hankwuke-uy inyongmwun yenkwu [A study on Korean quotatives constructions]. In Young-Keun Ko & Ki-Sim Nam (eds.), Kwukeuy Thongsa Uymilon [Korean syntax and semantics], 132–149. Seoul: Tap Publishing Company.Google Scholar

  • Mayes, Patricia. 1990. Quotation in spoken English. Studies in Language 14. 325–363.Google Scholar

  • Nam, Ki-Sim. 2001. Hyundai Kwuke Thongsalon [Korean syntax]. Seoul: Thaehaksa.Google Scholar

  • Park, Yu-Jong. 2009. Interaction between grammar and multimodal resources: quoting different characters in Korean multiparty conversation. Discourse Studies 11(1). 79–104.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Polanyi, Livia. 1982. Literary complexity in everyday storytelling. In Deborah Tannen (ed.), Spoken and written language: Exploring orality and literacy, 155–170. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar

  • Rae, John & Joanne Kerby 2007. Designing context for reporting tactical talk. In Elizabeth Holt & Rebecca Clift (eds.), Reporting talk: Reported speech in interaction, 179–194. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. 2000. On granularity. Annual Review of Sociology 26. 715–720.Google Scholar

  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. 2007. Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Sidnell, Jack. 2006. Coordinating talk, gaze, and gesture in reenactments. Research on Language and Social Interaction 39(4). 377–409.Google Scholar

  • Sohn, Ho-Min. 1999. The Korean language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Suh, Cheong-Soo. 1996. Kwuke Mwunpep [Korean grammar]. Seoul: Hanyang University Press.Google Scholar

  • Volosinov, Valentin N. 1973. Quasi-direct discourse in French, German, and Russian. In Valentin N. Volosinov (ed.), Marxism and the philosophy of language, 141–159. New York, NY: Seminar Press.Google Scholar

  • Wu, Ruey-Jiuan R. 2012. Self-praising through reporting: Strategic use of two reporting practices in Mandarin conversation. Discourse Processes 49. 622–659.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Yi, Phil-Young. 1995. Kwuke-uy Inyong-kwumwun Yenkwu [A study on Korean quotative constructions]. Seoul: Tap Publishing Company.Google Scholar

About the article

Mary Shin Kim

Mary Shin Kim received her PhD in Korean Linguistics from the University of California, Los Angeles, and is currently associate professor at the University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa. Her research includes analysis of discourse and conversation, in particular, evidentiality, epistemic stance, and reported speech from an interactional linguistics perspective. She has published her research in Discourse Processes, Discourse Studies, Journal of Pragmatics, and Research on Language and Social Interaction.


Published Online: 2015-11-28

Published in Print: 2015-12-01


Citation Information: Text & Talk, Volume 35, Issue 6, Pages 759–787, ISSN (Online) 1860-7349, ISSN (Print) 1860-7330, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2015-0021.

Export Citation

©2015 by De Gruyter Mouton.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in