Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Text & Talk

An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse & Communication Studies

Ed. by Sarangi, Srikant


IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 0.400
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.750

CiteScore 2018: 0.61

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.305
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.670

Online
ISSN
1860-7349
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 35, Issue 6

Issues

Direct reported speech in storytellings: Enacting and negotiating epistemic entitlements

Evelyne Berger
  • Corresponding author
  • Finnish Centre of Excellence in Intersubjectivity in Interaction, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 4 (Vuorikatu 3), 00014 Helsinki, Finland
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Simona Pekarek Doehler
Published Online: 2015-11-28 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2015-0023

Abstract

This paper presents a study of participants’ use of direct reported speech (DRS) in storytelling during dinner table conversation in French. Focusing on reported dialogues, the analysis corroborates earlier conversation analytic findings showing that speakers regularly use linguistic, prosodic and paralinguistic resources to stage the characters whose speech is being reported; thereby speakers display their stance on behalf of those characters and their conduct. Additionally, the analysis documents that speakers use DRS within reported dialogues as a powerful means for depicting their own adequate conduct in the face of a purportedly “deviant” conduct of a third party. In the specific context of our data, in which an au-pair interacts with her host family, such direct reported dialogues are used both by the mother and the au pair as a means to enact shared expectations about the appropriateness of a caregiver’s conduct in the face of the “deviant” conduct of a child. In light of these findings, the representation of past dialogues by means of DRS appears as a practical resource by means of which participants enact identities such as mother and caregiver and thereby reflexively construct and negotiate the related epistemic entitlements.

Keywords: direct reported speech; reported dialogue; epistemic entitlement; prosodic design; storytelling

References

  • Bangerter, Adrian, Eric Mayor & Simona Pekarek Doehler. 2011. Reported speech in conversational narratives during shift handover meetings of nursing care units. Discourse Processes 48. 184–214.Google Scholar

  • Clift, Rebecca & Elizabeth Holt. 2007. Introduction. In Elizabeth Holt & Rebecca Clift (eds.), Reporting talk. Reported speech in interaction, 1–15. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. 1999. Coherent voicing: On prosody in conversational reported speech. In Wolfram Bublitz, Uta Lenk & Eija Ventola (eds.), Coherence in spoken and written discourse: How to create it and how to describe it, 11–32. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. 2007. Assessing and accounting. In Elizabeth Holt & Rebecca Clift (eds.), Reporting talk. Reported speech in interaction, 81–119. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Drew, Paul. 1998. Complaints about transgressions and misconduct. Research on Language and Social Interaction 31. 295–325.Google Scholar

  • Günthner, Susanne. 1999. Polyphony and the layering of voices in reported dialogs: An analysis of the use of prosodic devices in everyday reported speech. Journal of Pragmatics 31. 695–708.Google Scholar

  • Heritage, John. 2012. Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction 45(1). 1–29.Google Scholar

  • Holt, Elizabeth. 1996. Reporting on talk: The use of direct reported speech in conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction 29. 219–245.Google Scholar

  • Holt, Elizabeth. 2000. Reporting and reacting: Concurrent responses to reported speech. Research on Language and Social Interaction 33. 425–454.Google Scholar

  • Holt, Elizabeth. 2007. ‘I’m envying your chop up mind’: Reporting and enacting. In Elizabeth Holt & Rebecca Clift (eds.), Reporting talk. Reported speech in interaction, 47–80. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Klewitz, Gabriele & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen. 1999. Quote-unquote. The role of prosody in the contextualization of reported speech sequences. Pragmatics 9(4). 459–485Google Scholar

  • Ochs, Elinor, Ruth Smith & Carolyn Taylor. 1989. Detective stories at dinnertime: Problem-solving through co-narration. Cultural Dynamics 2(2). 238–257.Google Scholar

  • Raymond, Geoffrey & John Heritage. 2006. The epistemics of social relations: Owning grandchildren. Language in Society 35. 677–705.Google Scholar

  • Sacks, Harvey. 1984. On doing ‘being ordinary’. In J. Maxwell Atkinson & John Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action, 413–429. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Sacks, Harvey. 1992. Lectures on conversation, vol. 2. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Schiffrin, Deborah. 1990. Narrative as self-portrait: Sociolinguistic constructions of identity. Language in Society 25. 167–203.Google Scholar

  • Sidnell, Jack. 2006. Coordinating gesture, talk, and gaze in re-enactments. Research on Language and Social Interaction 39. 377–409.Google Scholar

  • Stivers, Tanya. 2008. Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation. Research on Language and Social Interaction 41(1). 31–57.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Stivers, Tanya, Lorenza Mondada & Jakob Steensig. 2011. Knowledge, morality and affiliation in social interaction. In Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada & Jakob Steensig (eds.), The morality of knowledge in interaction, 3–24. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

About the article

Evelyne Berger

Evelyne Berger is currently a Post-Doc at the Finnish Centre of Excellence in Intersubjectivity in Interaction at the University of Helsinki. She works currently in a third-party funded project on grammatical practices for structuring storytelling activities in French ordinary conversations. Her research interests include also turn-taking practices, repair organization, embodied conducts, second language talk, and classroom interactions.

Simona Pekarek Doehler

Simona Pekarek Doehler is professor of Applied Linguistics at the University of Neuchâtel. In her research she explores how communicative resources, including language, emerge from the process of interaction. Her work has appeared e.g. in Discourse Processes, the Modern Language Journal and Journal of Pragmatics. She has co-edited, with J. K. Hall and J. Hellermann, L2 Interactional Competence and Development (2011).


Published Online: 2015-11-28

Published in Print: 2015-12-01


Citation Information: Text & Talk, Volume 35, Issue 6, Pages 789–813, ISSN (Online) 1860-7349, ISSN (Print) 1860-7330, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2015-0023.

Export Citation

©2015 by De Gruyter Mouton.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Niina Lilja and Arja Piirainen-Marsh
Applied Linguistics, 2019, Volume 40, Number 4, Page 594
[2]
Joseph C. Webb, Alison Pilnick, and Jennifer Clegg
Research on Language and Social Interaction, 2018, Volume 51, Number 4, Page 347
[3]
Innhwa Park
Journal of Pragmatics, 2018, Volume 129, Page 1
[4]
Ufuk Balaman and Olcay Sert
Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2017, Page 1

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in