Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Text & Talk

An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse & Communication Studies

Ed. by Sarangi, Srikant


IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 0.400
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.750

CiteScore 2018: 0.61

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.305
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.670

Online
ISSN
1860-7349
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 35, Issue 6

Issues

Introduction: Represented talk across activities and languages

Matthew T. Prior
Published Online: 2015-11-28 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2015-0026

References

  • Bakhtin, Mihail M. & Michael Holquist. 1981. The dialogic imagination: Four essays. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

  • Barnes, Rebecca & Duncan Moss. 2007. Communicating a feeling: The social organization of ‘private thoughts’. Discourse Studies 9(2). 123–148.Google Scholar

  • Bauman, Richard. 1986. Story, performance, and event: Contextual studies of oral narrative. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Bauman, Richard. 2004. A world of others’ words: Cross-cultural perspectives on intertextuality. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Baynham, Mike. 1996. Direct speech: What’s it doing in non-narrative discourse? Journal of Pragmatics 25(1). 61–81.Google Scholar

  • Baynham, Mike & Stef Slembrouck (eds.). 1999. Speech representation and institutional discourse [Special Issue]. Text 19(4).

  • Besnier, Nico. 1993. Reported speech and affect on Nukulaelae Atoll. In Jane H. Hill & Judith T. Irvine (eds.), Responsibility and evidence in oral discourse, 161–181. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Bloomfield, Leonard. 1961. Language. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar

  • Bublitz Wolfram & Monika Bednarek. 2009. Reported speech: Pragmatic aspects. In Jacob L. Mey (ed.), Concise encyclopedia of pragmatics, 861–864. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar

  • Buchstaller, Isabelle. 2014. Quotatives: New trends and sociolinguistic implications. Malden, MA: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.Google Scholar

  • Buchstaller, Isabelle & Ingrid van Alphen (eds.). 2012. Quotatives: Cross-linguistic and cross-disciplinary perspectives. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Buttny, Richard. 1997. Reported speech in talking race on campus. Human Communication Research 23(4). 477–506.Google Scholar

  • Buttny, Richard. 1998. Putting prior talk into context: Reported speech and the reporting context. Research on Language and Social Interaction 31(1). 45–58.Google Scholar

  • Buttny, Richard. 2003. Multiple voices in talking race: Pakeha reported speech in the discursive construction of the racial other. In Harry van den Berg, Margaret Wetherell & Hanneke Houtkoop-Steenstra (eds.), Analyzing race talk: Multidisciplinary perspectives on the research interview, 103–118. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press:Google Scholar

  • Buttny, Richard. 2004. Talking problems: Studies of discursive construction. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

  • Buttny, Richard & Princess L. Williams. 2000. Demanding respect: the uses of reported speech in discursive constructions of interracial contact. Discourse and Society 11(1). 109–133.Google Scholar

  • Clark, Herbert H. & Richard J. Gerrig. 1990. Quotation as demonstrations. Language 66. 764–805.Google Scholar

  • Clift, Rebecca. 2006. Indexing stance: Reported speech as an interactional evidential. Journal of Sociolinguistics 10(5). 569–595.Google Scholar

  • Clift, Rebecca. 2007. Getting there first: Non-narrative reported speech in interaction. In Elizabeth Holt & Rebecca Clift (eds.), Reporting talk: Reported speech in interaction, 120–149. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Collins, Daniel E. 2001. Reanimated voices: Speech reporting in a historical-pragmatic perspective. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • De Fina, Anna. 2003. Identity in narrative: A study in immigrant discourse. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Drew, Paul. 1998. Complaints about transgressions and misconduct. Research on Language and Social Interaction 31. 295–325.Google Scholar

  • Englebretson, Robert. 2007. Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Fitch, Kristine L. 2005. Conclusion: Behind the scenes of language and scholarly interaction. In Kristine L. Fitch & Robert E. Sanders (eds.), Handbook of language and social interaction, 461–482. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

  • Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

  • Goodwin, Charles. 2007. Interactive footing. In Elizabeth Holt & Rebecca Clift (eds.), Reporting talk: Reported speech in interaction, 16–46. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Guardioloa, Mathilde & Roxane Bertrand. 2013. Interactional convergence in conversational storytelling: When reported speech is a cue of alignment and/or affiliation. Frontiers in Psychology 4. 1–17.Google Scholar

  • Güldemann, Tom & Manfred von Roncador. (eds.). 2002. Reported discourse: A meeting ground for different linguistic domains. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Günthner, Susanne. 1997. The contextualization of affect in reported dialogues. In Susanne Niemeier & René Dirven (eds.), The language of emotions: Conceptualization, expression and theoretical Foundation, 257–275. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Günthner, Susanne. 1999. Polyphony and the layering of voices in reported dialogs: An analysis of the use of prosodic devices in everyday reported speech. Journal of Pragmatics 31. 695–708.Google Scholar

  • Haakana, Markku. 2007. Reported thought in complaint stories. In Elizabeth Holt & Rebecca Clift (eds.), Reporting talk: Reported speech in interaction, 150–178. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Hill, Jane H. & Judith T. Irvine (eds.). 1993. Responsibility and evidence in oral discourse. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Holt, Elizabeth & Rebecca Clift (eds.). 2007. Reporting talk: Reported speech in interaction. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Hutchby, Ian & Robin Wooffitt. 2008. Conversation Analysis. Malden, MA: Polity Press.

  • Jaffe, Alexandra M. 2009. Stance: Sociolinguistic perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Jefferson, G. 2004. Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner (ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation, 13–31. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

  • Kasper, Gabriele & Matthew T. Prior. 2015. Analyzing story telling in TESOL interview research. TESOL Quarterly 49(2), 226–255.Google Scholar

  • Klewitz, Gabriele & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen. 1999. Quote-unquote? The role of prosody in the contextualization of reported speech sequences. Pragmatics 9. 459–485.Google Scholar

  • Koven, Michèle. 2007. Selves in two languages: Bilingual verbal enactments of identity in French and Portuguese. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Kuo, Sai-Hua. 2001. Reported speech in Chinese political discourse. Discourse Studies 3(2). 181–202.Google Scholar

  • Leech, Geoffrey N. & Mick Short. 1981. Style in fiction: A linguistic introduction to English fictional prose. London: Longman.Google Scholar

  • Mathis, Terrie & George Yule. 1994. Zero quotatives. Discourse Processes 18. 63–76.Google Scholar

  • Mayes, Patricia. 1990. Quotation in spoken English. Studies in Language 14(2). 325–363.Google Scholar

  • Peräkylä, Anssi & Marja-Leena Sorjonen. 2012. Emotion in interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Potter, Jonathan. 1996. Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

  • Prior, Matthew T. 2011. Self-presentation in L2 interview talk: Narrative versions, accountability, and emotionality. Applied Linguistics 32(1). 60–76.Google Scholar

  • Quasthoff, Uta M. & Tabea Becker. 2004. Narrative interaction. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Rintell, Ellen. 1990. That’s incredible: Stories of emotion told by second language learners and native speakers. In Robin C. Scarcella, Elaine S. Anderson & Stephen D. Krashen (eds.), Developing communicative competence in a second language, 75–94. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.Google Scholar

  • Romaine, Suzanne & Deborah Lange. 1991. The use of like as a marker of reported speech and thought: A case of grammaticalization in progress. American Speech 66. 227–279.Google Scholar

  • Schiffrin, Deborah. 2006. In other words: Variation in reference and narrative. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Selting, Margret. 2010. Affectivity in conversational storytelling: An analysis of displays of anger or indignation in complaint stories. Pragmatics 20. 229–277.Google Scholar

  • Stivers, Tanya. 2008. Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding Is a token of affiliation. Research on Language & Social Interaction 41(1). 31–57.Google Scholar

  • Stokoe, Elizabeth & Derek Edwards. 2007. ‘Black this, black that’: Racial insults and reported speech in neighbour complaints and police interrogations. Discourse & Society 18(3). 337–372.Google Scholar

  • Tannen, Deborah. 2007. Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Vásquez, Camilla & Alfredo Urzúa. 2009. Reported speech and reported mental states in mentoring meetings: Exploring novice teacher identities. Research on Language and Social Interaction 42(1). 1–19.Google Scholar

  • Vincent, Diane & Laurent Perrin. 1999. On the narrative vs. non-narrative functions of reported speech: A socio-pragmatic study. Journal of Sociolinguistics 3(3). 291–313.Google Scholar

  • Vološinov, Valentin. N. 1973. Marxism and the philosophy of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

  • Wooffitt, Robin. 1992. Telling tales of the unexpected: The organization of factual discourse. Hertfordshire, UK: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar

About the article

Matthew T. Prior

Matthew T. Prior is an assistant professor in Applied Linguistics/TESOL in the Department of English at Arizona State University. His interests include narrative and discursive-constructionist approaches to emotion, multilingualism, and identity. His recent monograph is Emotion and Discourse in L2 Narrative Research (2016, Multilingual Matters).


Published Online: 2015-11-28

Published in Print: 2015-12-01


Citation Information: Text & Talk, Volume 35, Issue 6, Pages 695–705, ISSN (Online) 1860-7349, ISSN (Print) 1860-7330, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2015-0026.

Export Citation

©2015 by De Gruyter Mouton.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Yuka Matsutani
Journal of Pragmatics, 2019, Volume 150, Page 150
[2]
Niina Lilja and Arja Piirainen-Marsh
Applied Linguistics, 2019, Volume 40, Number 4, Page 594

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in