Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Text & Talk

An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse & Communication Studies

Ed. by Sarangi, Srikant


IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 0.400
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.750

CiteScore 2018: 0.61

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.305
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.670

Online
ISSN
1860-7349
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 36, Issue 3

Issues

Metalinguistic comments in teenage personal blogs: Bringing youth voices to studies of youth, language and technology

Ksenija Bogetić
Published Online: 2016-04-30 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2016-0012

Abstract

The language that young people use in technologically mediated interactions has been sensationally exoticized by the mass media, constructed as a distinct form of communication barely comprehensible to adults, and presented as a threat to standard English, as well as to human relationships and the social order. The question of young people’s actual role in linguistic and social change is one that runs through much of the existing research on the subject, but also one that remains limited to adult perspectives. In the present study, I aim to address this gap by investigating young people’s own metalanguage in a genre where traditionally such metalinguistic awareness would be little expected – in teenage personal blogs. The material used is composed of 32 personal blogs written by American teenagers in the period between 2010 and 2013, collected from a popular dating website, Mylol.net. The teenage bloggers are shown to frequently orient to their peers’ Internet language and to norms of orthography, perpetuating many aspects of standard-language ideology and linking them with adolescent concerns. I wish to use these examples in order to draw attention to the diversity of teenagers’ attitudes to language and technologically mediated communication, which works to challenge particular dominant assumptions. More broadly, I will argue that a full understanding of young people’s online practices and their potential impact on language and communication crucially requires more nuanced attention to youth voices and youth agency.

Keywords: youth; CMC; blogging; language ideology; language change

References

  • Agha, Asif. 2003. The social life of cultural value. Language and Communication 23(3). 231–273.Google Scholar

  • Alim, H. Sammy. 2009. Translocal style communities: Hip hop youth as cultural theorists of style, language, and globalization. Pragmatics 19(1). 103–127Google Scholar

  • Androutsopoulos, Jannis. 2006. Introduction: Sociolinguistics and computer‐mediated communication. Journal of Sociolinguistics 10(4). 419–438.Google Scholar

  • Androutsopoulos, Jannis. 2011. From variation to heteroglossia in the study of computer-mediated discourse. In Crispin Thurlow & Kristine Mroczek (eds.), Digital discourse: Language in the new media, 277–298. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Bakhtin, Mikhail., 1981. The dialogic imagination: Four essays by MM Bakhtin (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.).

  • Baron, Naomi. 2000. From alphabet to email: How written English evolved and where it’s headed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Baron, Naomi. 2002. Who sets e-mail style? Prescriptivism, coping strategies, and democratizing communication access. The Information Society 18(5). 403–413.Google Scholar

  • Baron, Naomi. 2003. Language of the internet. In Al Farghali (ed.), The Stanford handbook for language Engineers, 59–127. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar

  • Baron, Naomi. 2004. See you online: Gender issues in college student use of instant messaging. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 23(4). 397–423.Google Scholar

  • Baron, Naomi. 2008. Always on: Language in an online and mobile world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Baron, Naomi 2009. Are digital media changing language? Educational Leadership 66(6). 42–46.Google Scholar

  • Baron, Naomi. 2010. Discourse structures in instant messaging: The case of utterance breaks. Language@Internet 7(4). 1–32.

  • Barton, David & Carmen Lee. 2013. Language online: Investigating digital texts and practices. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Bennett, Sue, Karl Maton & Lisa Kervin. 2008. The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of EducationalTechnology 39(5). 775–786.

  • Blommaert, Jan (ed.). 1999. Language ideological debates, Vol. 2. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

  • Bucholtz, Mary. 2000. Language and youth culture. American Speech 75(3). 280–283.Google Scholar

  • Bucholtz, Mary. 2002. Youth and cultural practice. Annual Review of Anthropology 31. 525–552.Google Scholar

  • Bucholtz, Mary. 2008. The whiteness of nerds: Superstandard English and racial markedness. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 11(1). 84–100.Google Scholar

  • Bucholtz, M. 2010. White kids: Language, race, and styles of youth identity. Cambridge University Press.

  • Bucholtz, Mary & Elena Skapoulli. 2009. Introduction: Youth language at the intersection: From migration to globalization. Pragmatics 19(1). 1–16.Google Scholar

  • Cameron, Deborah (ed.). 1993. Researching language: Issues of power and method. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Cameron, Deborah. 1995. Verbal hygiene. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Cameron, Deborah. 2000. Good to talk? Living and working in a communication culture. London: Sage.Google Scholar

  • Cohen, Stanley. 2002. Folk devils and moral panics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Crowley, Tony. 1991. Proper English: Readings in language, history and cultural identity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Crystal, David. 1984. Who cares about English usage? Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

  • Crystal, David. 2001. Language and the Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Crystal, David. 2008. Txting: The Gr8 Db8. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • D’Arcy, Alexandra & Taylor Marie Young. 2012. Ethics and social media: Implications for sociolinguistics in the networked public. Journal of Sociolinguistics 16(4). 532–546.Google Scholar

  • Drouin, Michelle & Claire Davis. 2009. R u txting? Is the use of text speak hurting your literacy? Journal of Literacy Research 41(1). 46–67.Google Scholar

  • Ecalle, Jean & Annie Magnan. 2008. Relations between print exposure and literacy skills: New evidence from Grade 1–5. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 26(4). 525–544.Google Scholar

  • Eckert, Penelope. 1989. Jocks and burnouts: Social categories and identity in the high school. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar

  • Fairclough, Norman. 1992. Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

  • Georgakopoulou, Alexandra. 2006. Postscript: Computer-mediated communication in sociolinguistics. Journal of Sociolinguistics 10(4). 548–557.Google Scholar

  • Griffin, Christine. 1993. Representations of youth: The study of youth and adolescence in Britain and America. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

  • Herring, Susan C. (ed.). 1996. Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social, and cross-cultural perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Herring, Susan C. 2001. Computer-mediated discourse. In Deborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen & Heidi Hamilton (eds.), The Handbook of discourse analysis, 612–634. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Herring, Susan C. 2004. Slouching toward the ordinary: Current trends in computer-mediated communication. New Media and Society 6(1). 26–36.Google Scholar

  • Herring, Susan C. 2008. Questioning the generational divide: Technological exoticism and adult construction of online youth identity. In David Buckingham (ed.), Youth, identity, and digital media, 71–94.

  • Herring, Susan C, Lois Ann Scheidt, Elijah Wright & Sabrina Bonus. 2005. Weblogs as a bridging genre. Information Technology and People 18(2). 142–171.Google Scholar

  • Heyd, Theresa. 2012. English and the media: Internet. In Laurel J. Brinton (ed.), English historical linguistics, 1105–1118. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

  • Irvine, Judith T. & Susan Gal. 2009. Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. Linguistic anthropology: A reader. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar

  • Janda, Richard. 1985. Note‐taking English as a simplified register. Discourse Processes 8(4). 437–454.Google Scholar

  • Jaworski, Adam, Nicholas Coupland & Dariusz Galasinski (eds). 2004. Metalanguage: Social and ideological perspectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Jones, Graham & Bambi Schieffelin. 2009. “My BFF Jill” from Boob Tube to YouTube. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication 14(4). 1050–1079.Google Scholar

  • Kemp, Nenagh & Catherine Bushnell. 2011. Children’s text messaging: Abbreviations, input methods and links with literacy. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 27(1). 18–27.Google Scholar

  • Lee, Carmen. 2013. My English is so poor … so I take photos”: Metalinguistic discourses about English on FlickR. Discourse 2. 91–111.Google Scholar

  • Leech, Geoffrey, Nicholas Smith & Paul Rayson. 2012. English style on the move: Variation and change in stylistic norms in the twentieth century. Language and Computers 76(1). 69–98.Google Scholar

  • Lippi-Green, Rosina. 1997. English with an accent: Language, ideology, and discrimination in the United States. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Lundberg, Ingvar, Jorgen Frost & Ole Peter Petersen. 1988. Effects of an extensive program for stimulating phonological awareness in preschool children. Reading Research Quarterly 23(3). 263–284.Google Scholar

  • Males, Mike. 1996. The scapegoat generation: America’s war on adolescents. Monroe: Common Courage Press.Google Scholar

  • McKay, Susan, Crispin Thurlow & Toomey Zimmerman. 2005. Wired whizzes or techno slaves? In Angie Williams & Crispin Thurlow (eds.), Talking adolescence: Perspectives on communication in the teenage years, 185–203. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

  • Milroy, James. 1998. Toward a speaker-based account of language change. Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 114. 21–36.

  • Milroy, James & Lesley Milroy. 1999. Authority in language: Investigating standard English (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Neville L. 2003. Cn U rEd dis? The causes and consequences of a ‘text message language’ in young teenagers. Unpublished undergraduate dissertation, University of Oxford, UK.

  • Plester, Beverly, Clare Wood & Victoria Bell. 2008. Txt msg n school literacy: Does mobile phone use adversely affect children’s written language attainment? Literacy 42(3). 137–144.Google Scholar

  • Plester, Beverly, Clare Wood & Puja Joshi. 2009. Exploring the relationship between children’s knowledge of text message abbreviations and school literacy outcomes. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 27(1). 145–161.Google Scholar

  • Plester, Beverly   Clare Wood. 2009. Exploring relationships between traditional and new media literacies: British preteen texters at school. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 14(4). 1108–1129.

  • Plester, Beverly, Marja-Kristiina Lerkkonen, Lauri J. Linjama, Helena Rasku-Puttonen & Karen Littleton. 2011. Finnish and UK English pre‐teen children’s text message language and its relationship with their literacy skills. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 27(1). 37–48.Google Scholar

  • Rosen, Larry, Jennifer Chang, Lynne Erwin, Mark Carrier & Nancy Cheever. 2010. The relationship between “textisms” and formal and informal writing among young adults. Communication Research 37(3). 420–440.Crossref

  • Rowe, Charley & Eva Lia Wyss. 2009. Language and new media: Linguistic, cultural, and technological evolutions. Cresskill: Hampton.Google Scholar

  • Schiffrin, Deborah, Deborah Tannen & Heidi Hamilton (eds.). 2008. The handbook of discourse analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

  • Shortis, Tim. 2007. Revoicing txt: Spelling, vernacular orthography and ‘unregimented writing’. In Santiago Posteguillo, María José Esteve & Lluïsa Gea-Valor (eds.), The texture of internet: Netlinguistics in progress, 2–23. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar

  • Silverstein, Michael. 1996. Monoglot “Standard” in America: Standardization and metaphors of linguistic hegemony. In Donald Brenneis & Ronald Macaulay (eds.), The matrix of language: Contemporary linguistic anthropology, 284–306. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

  • Squires, Lauren. 2007. On Netspeak’s destruction of English. Paper presented at the IR 8.0 conference, http://aoir.org/conferences/past/ir-8-2007/. Accessed Feb. 8 2014.

  • Squires, Lauren. 2010. Enregistering internet language. Language in Society 39(4). 457–492.Google Scholar

  • Stuart-Smith, Jane. 2007. The influence of the media. In Carmen Llamas, Louise Mullany & Peter Stockwell (eds.), The Routledge companion to sociolinguistics, 140–148. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Stuart-Smith, Jane. 2012. English and the media: Television. In Alexander Bergs & Laurel J. Brinton (eds.), English historical linguistics: An international handbook, 1075–1088. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Strover, John. 2012. A retrospective on convergence, moral panic, and the Internet. Frontiers in New Media Research 15. 132–154.Google Scholar

  • Tagliamonte, Sali & Derek Denis. 2008. Linguistic ruin? LOL! Instant messaging and teen language. American Speech 83(1). 3–34.Google Scholar

  • Thimm, Caja. 2008. Technically-mediated interpersonal communication. Handbook of Interpersonal Communication 2. 331–341.Google Scholar

  • Thurlow, Crispin. 2003. Generation Txt? The sociolinguistics of young people’s text-messaging. Discourse analysis online, http://extra.shu.ac.uk/daol/articles/v1/n1/a3/thurlow2002003-paper.html. Accessed Feb. 8 2014.

  • Thurlow, Crispin. 2006. From statistical panic to moral panic: The metadiscursive construction and popular exaggeration of new media language in the print media. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 11(3). 667–701.Google Scholar

  • Thurlow, Crispin. 2007. Fabricating youth: New-media discourse and the technologization of young people. In Sally Johnson & Astrid Ensslin (eds.), Language in the media: Representations, identities, ideologies, 213–233. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

  • Thurlow, Crispin, Laura Lengel & Alice Tomic. 2004. Computer mediated communication: Social interaction and the internet. London: Sage.Google Scholar

  • Thurlow, Crispin & Kristine Mroczek. 2011. Fresh perspectives on new media sociolinguistics. In Crispin Thurlow & Kristine Mroczek (eds.), Digital discourse: Language in the new media, xix-xiiv. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Thurlow, Crispin. 2014. Disciplining youth: Language ideologies and new technologies. In Adam Jaworski & Nicholas Coupland (eds.), The discourse reader, 481–496. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Thurlow, Crispin & Katherine Bell. 2009. Against technologization: Young people’s new media discourse as creative cultural practice. Journal of Computer–Mediated Communication 14(4). 1038–1049.

  • Thurlow, Crispin. 2014. Disciplining youth: Language ideologies and new technologies. In Adam Jaworski & Nicholas Coupland (eds.), The discourse reader, 481–496. London: Routledge.

  • Zimmer, Michael. 2010. But the data is already public: On the ethics of research in Facebook. Ethics and Information Technology 12(4). 313–325. http://www.mylol.net/Google Scholar

About the article

Ksenija Bogetić

Ksenija Bogetić obtained an MA in English linguistics at the University of Oxford and a BA in English language at the University of Belgrade, Serbia. Her research interests include language ideologies, (new) media language, as well as language, gender and sexuality. She is currently a lecturer and PhD candidate at the University of Belgrade.


Published Online: 2016-04-30

Published in Print: 2016-05-01


Citation Information: Text & Talk, Volume 36, Issue 3, Pages 245–268, ISSN (Online) 1860-7349, ISSN (Print) 1860-7330, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2016-0012.

Export Citation

©2016 by De Gruyter Mouton.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Ksenija Bogetić
Metaphor and the Social World, 2017, Volume 7, Number 2

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in