Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Text & Talk

An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse & Communication Studies

Ed. by Sarangi, Srikant

6 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.448
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.686

CiteScore 2016: 0.63

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.644
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.508

Online
ISSN
1860-7349
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 36, Issue 4

Issues

Conceptualizing the economy as a living organism: vivification in Arab economic discourse

Mikolaj Domaradzki
Published Online: 2016-06-21 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2016-0019

Abstract

The present paper is a corpus-based inquiry into the importance of vivification for producing a systematic and persuasive Arab economic discourse. Thus, this article examines how and why the economy is metaphorically conceptualized in modern Arabic as a Living Organism that can be said to ‘grow’, ‘revive’, etc. Having analyzed the frequency with which the various instantiations of this generic metaphor appear in Arab economic discourse, the paper goes on to discuss the value judgments that they convey. The analogy between a living organism and an economy is shown to induce very specific evaluations of such conditions as ‘growing’ or ‘being revived’. Hence, vivification is demonstrated to play a vital role in providing Arab economic discourse with textual cohesion. Although this article argues for the universal bodily grounding of the Economy Is A Living Organism metaphor, it also shows this experiential basis to be subject to cultural interpretation. The analyses carried out here suggest that projecting such physical concepts as those of ‘growth’ or ‘revival’ onto the social domain of economics entails that they are interpreted in accordance with the particular social interests of a given community.

Keywords: metaphor; vivification; Arabic; economic discourse; rhetoric; corpus analysis

References

  • Abdou, Ashraf. 2012. Arabic idioms: A corpus based study. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Boers, Frank. 1997. ‘No pain, no gain’ in a free market rhetoric: A test for cognitive semantics? Metaphor and Symbol 12(4). 231–241.Google Scholar

  • Boers, Frank. 2000. Enhancing metaphoric awareness in specialised reading. English for Specific Purposes 19. 137–147.Google Scholar

  • Boers, Frank & Murielle Demecheleer. 1997. A few metaphorical models in (Western) economic discourse. In Wolf-Andreas Liebert, Gisela Redeker & Linda Waugh (eds.), Discourse and perspective in cognitive linguistics, 115–129. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Buckwalter, Tim & Dilworth Parkinson. 2011. A frequency dictionary of Arabic: Core vocabulary for learners. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Cameron, Lynne. 1999. Identifying and describing metaphor in spoken discourse data. In Lynne Cameron & Graham Low (eds.), Researching and applying metaphor, 105–132. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Castaño, Emilia, Isabel Verdaguer, Natalia Judith Laso & Aaron Ventura. 2014. Economy is a living organism: Metaphorical expressions in a learner corpus of English. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 27(2). 323–337.Google Scholar

  • Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2000. Metaphor and vocabulary teaching in ESP economics. English for Specific Purposes 19. 149–165.Google Scholar

  • Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2004. Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.Google Scholar

  • Charteris-Black, Jonathan & Timothy Ennis. 2001. A comparative study of metaphor in Spanish and English financial reporting. English for Specific Purposes 20. 249–266.Google Scholar

  • Charteris-Black, Jonathan & Andreas Musolff. 2003. ‘Battered hero’ or ‘innocent victim’? A comparative study of metaphors for euro trading in British and German financial reporting. English for Specific Purposes 22. 153–176.Google Scholar

  • Deignan, Alice. 1999. Corpus-based research into metaphor. In Lynne Cameron & Graham Low (eds.), Researching and applying metaphor, 177–199. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Deignan, Alice. 2005. Metaphor and corpus linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Dirven, René & Wolf Paprotté. 1985. Introduction. In Wolf Paprotté & René Dirven (eds.), The ubiquity of metaphor, vii–xix. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Domaradzki, Mikolaj. 2011. The self in Arabic and the relativism-universalism controversy. Cognitive Linguistics 22(3). 535–567.Google Scholar

  • Domaradzki, Mikolaj. 2013. Conceptualizing conflict in Arab economic news reporting. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 1(1). 114–135.Google Scholar

  • Fukuda, Kosei. 2009. A comparative study of metaphors representing the US and Japanese economies. Journal of Pragmatics 41. 1693–1702.Google Scholar

  • Gibbs, Raymond W. 1994. The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Goatly, Andrew. 2007. Washing the brain. Metaphor and hidden ideology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Henderson, Willie. 1994. Metaphor and economics. In Roger E. Backhouse (ed.), New directions in economic methodology, 343–367. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Hunt, Shelby D. & Anil Menon. 1995. Metaphors and competitive advantage: Evaluating the use of metaphors in theories of competitive strategy. Journal of Business Research 33. 81–90.Google Scholar

  • Johnson, Mark. 1987. The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Koller, Veronika. 2004. Metaphor and gender in business media discourse: A critical cognitive study. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.Google Scholar

  • Kövecses, Zoltán. 2000. Metaphor and emotion: Language, culture, and body in human feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Kövecses, Zoltán. 2005. Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

  • Lakoff, George & Mark Turner. 1989. More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • López Maestre, María D. 2000. The business of cognitive stylistics: a survey of conceptual metaphors in business English. Atlantis 22(1). 47–69.Google Scholar

  • McCloskey, Donald N. 1985. The rhetoric of economics. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar

  • McCloskey, Donald N. 1990. If you’re so smart. The narrative of economic expertise. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • McCloskey, Donald N. 1994. How to do a rhetorical analysis, and why. In Roger E. Backhouse (ed.), New directions in economic methodology, 318–342. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Musolff, Andreas. 2004. Metaphor and political discourse: Analogical reasoning in debates about Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.Google Scholar

  • Ryding, Karin C. 2005. A reference grammar of modern standard Arabic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Semino, Elena. 2008. Metaphor in discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Smart, Jack R. 1993. Arabic. Kent: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar

  • Wang, Huili, Tamara Runtsova, Hongjun Chen. 2013. Economy is an organism: A comparative study of metaphor in English and Russian economic discourse. Text & Talk 33(2). 259–288.Google Scholar

  • Wehr, Hans. 1979. A dictionary of modern written Arabic. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

  • White, Michael. 1997. The use of metaphor in reporting financial market transactions. Cuadernos de Filologia Inglesa 6(2). 233–245.Google Scholar

  • White, Michael. 2003. Metaphor and economics: The case of growth. English for Specific Purposes 22. 131–151.Google Scholar

About the article

Mikolaj Domaradzki

Mikolaj Domaradzki graduated from the Faculty of Modern Languages at Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan (Poland), where he also obtained his PhD in philosophy and is currently employed as an associate professor at the Faculty of Social Sciences. At present his linguistic research is concerned with metaphors in the Arabic language, on which he has published several articles, among others, in Cognitive Linguistics and Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict.


Published Online: 2016-06-21

Published in Print: 2016-07-01


Citation Information: Text & Talk, Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages 417–443, ISSN (Online) 1860-7349, ISSN (Print) 1860-7330, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2016-0019.

Export Citation

©2016 by De Gruyter Mouton. Copyright Clearance Center

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in