Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Text & Talk

An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse & Communication Studies

Ed. by Sarangi, Srikant


IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 0.400
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.750

CiteScore 2018: 0.61

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.305
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.670

Online
ISSN
1860-7349
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 36, Issue 4

Issues

Busco una mujer de verdad: the gender is a performance conceptual metaphor in personal ads on the Internet

Deyanira Rojas-Sosa
Published Online: 2016-06-21 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2016-0021

Abstract

Gender performativity theory considers that gender is not a natural consequence of people’s bodies, but a series of repeated acts regulated by social constraints that one performs to create a natural, usually heterosexual, being. Through the analysis of the conceptual metaphor gender is a performance in Spanish Internet personal ads, this study shows linguistic evidence that speakers, ad posters, are aware of the performative nature of gender, and also shows gender as a prototypical category, in which some members are more central than others. Finally, when using this conceptual metaphor, this study shows that ad posters describe the characteristics of ideal heterosexuals as naturalized and commonsense, thereby re-creating traditional ideologies about gender, and further promoting heteronormativity.

Keywords: metaphors; gender; online personal ads; heteronormativity; Spanish

References

  • Aultman, B. Lee. 2014. Cisgender. Transgender Studies Quarterly 1(1–2). 61.Google Scholar

  • Baker, Paul. 2003. No effeminates please: A corpus-based analysis of masculinity via personal adverts in Gay News/Times 1973–2000. The Sociological Review 51. 243–260.Google Scholar

  • Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender trouble. Feminism and the subversion of identity. Imitation and gender insubordination. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Butler, Judith. 2004. Undoing gender. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Cameron, Deborah. 1997. Performing gender: Young men’s talk and the construction of heterosexual masculinity. In Sally Johnson and Ulrike Meinhof (eds), Language and masculinity, 47–64. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Cameron, Deborah and Don Kulick. 2003. Language and sexuality. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar

  • Cameron, Deborah, and Don Kulick. 2006. The semiotics of sex and the discourse of desire. In Deborah Cameron, and Don Kulick (eds), The language and sexuality reader. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Channell, Joanna. 1994. Vague language. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar

  • Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2004. Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. New York: Palgrave. McMillan.Google Scholar

  • Coupland, Justine. 1996. Dating advertisements: Discourses of the commodified self. Discourse and Society 7(2). 187–207.Google Scholar

  • Eckert, Penelope. 1994. Entering the heterosexual marketplace: identities of subordination as a development imperative. Working papers on Learning and Identity, 2. Palo Alto, CA: Institute for Research on Learning.

  • Fairclough, Norman. 2015. Language and power. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Kiesling, Scott. 2006. Playing the straight man: displaying and maintaining male heterosexuality in discourse. In Deborah Cameron and Don Kulick (eds), The Language and sexuality reader. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Kitzinger, Celia. 2006. ‘Speaking as heterosexual’: (how) does sexuality matter for talk-in-interaction? In Deborah Cameron, and Don Kulick (eds), The Language and sexuality reader. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Kövecses, Zoltán. 1986. Metaphors of anger, pride and love. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Land, Victoria, and Celia Kitzinger. 2005. Speaking as a lesbian: Correcting the heterosexist presumption, Research on Language and Social Interaction 38(4). 371–416.Google Scholar

  • Lemke, Jay. 2008. Identity, development, and desire: Critical questions. In Carmen Rosa Caldas-Coulthard, and Rick Iedema (eds), Identity trouble. Critical discourse and contested identities. New York: Palgrave. McMillan.Google Scholar

  • Marley, Carol. 2000. Beyond the usual: The Modification of gender in a British dating ads column. Text 20(3). 271–306.Google Scholar

  • Marley, Carol. 2007. Metaphors of identity in dating ads and newspaper articles. Text and Talk 27(1). 55–78.Google Scholar

  • Marley, Carol. 2008. Assuming identities: The workings of intertextual metaphors in a corpus of dating ads. Journal of Pragmatics 40. 559–576.Google Scholar

  • Pascoe, C.J. 2011. Dude, You’re a Fag: Masculinity and sexuality in high school. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

  • Rendle-Short, Johanna. 2005. ‘I’ve got a paper-shuffler for a husband’: indexing sexuality on talk-back radio. Discourse & Society 16. 561–578.Google Scholar

  • Smith, Christine A. and Stillman, Shannon. 2002. Butch/Femme in the personal advertisements of lesbians. Journal of Lesbian Studies 6(1). 45–51.Google Scholar

  • Stokoe, Elizabeth. 2012. “You know how men are”: Description, categorization and common knowledge in the anatomy of a categorical practice. Gender and Language 6(1). 233–255.Google Scholar

  • Taylor, John. 1995. Linguistic categorization. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Thorne, Adrian and Coupland, Justine. 1998. Articulations of same-sex desire: Lesbian and gay male dating advertisements. Journal of Sociolinguistics 2(2). 233–257.Google Scholar

About the article

Deyanira Rojas-Sosa

Deyanira Rojas-Sosa received her PhD in Hispanic Linguistics from the University of Minnesota. She is Assistant Professor at SUNY New Paltz. Her research interests include language and gender, Spanish and Latinas/os in the United States, and discourse analysis. Her most recent publication is “The denial of racism in Latino students’ narratives about discrimination in the classroom” (Discourse and Society, January 2016, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 69–94).


Published Online: 2016-06-21

Published in Print: 2016-07-01


Citation Information: Text & Talk, Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages 469–491, ISSN (Online) 1860-7349, ISSN (Print) 1860-7330, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2016-0021.

Export Citation

©2016 by De Gruyter Mouton.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in