Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Text & Talk

An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse & Communication Studies

Ed. by Sarangi, Srikant

6 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 0.426
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.724

CiteScore 2017: 0.63

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.326
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.625

Online
ISSN
1860-7349
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 36, Issue 5

Issues

Creepy-ass cracker in post-racial America: Don West’s examination of Rachel Jeantel in the George Zimmerman murder trial

Tyanna Slobe
Published Online: 2016-08-24 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2016-0026

Abstract

This article examines interactions between defense attorney Don West and witness Rachel Jeantel in the 2013 State of Florida v. George Zimmerman trial following the murder of Trayvon Martin. The focus of analysis is how the defense constitutes the term creepy-ass cracker as evidence of violence and aggression on behalf of Trayvon Martin. Their argument is located within an ideological framework of a post-racial American society wherein the defense claims colorblindness (Bonilla-Silva 2014) for their client George Zimmerman. Trayvon Martin’s observation of Zimmerman’s whiteness, as indexed by the word cracker, is positioned as evidence of a culture and an individual with inherently violent, racially motivated intentions. The article examines interactional moments during the defense’s questioning of Rachel Jeantel wherein creepy-ass cracker is positioned as immoral within a post-racial ideological framework, and evidence of racism toward white people. Don West’s use of pauses, hyper-articulated Standard American English, and emblematic deictic terms discursively and linguistically segregate Martin’s and Jeantel’s community from the hegemonic white practices of the courtroom. West’s attempts to assert symbolic control over the semantic meaning of creepy-ass cracker reflect the relative unmarkedness of Standard American English and whiteness in contemporary United States judicial systems and society.

Keywords: critical discourse analysis; George Zimmerman trial; legal discourse; post-racial ideology; race and racism; Standard American English (SAE); African American Vernacular English (AAVE)

References

  • Abuznaid, Ahmad, Caroline Bettinger-Lopez, Charlotte Cassel & Meena Jagannath. 2014. Stand your ground laws: International human rights law implications. U. Miami L. Rev. 68. 1129.Google Scholar

  • Alim, H. Samy. 2004. Hearing what’s not said and missing what is: Black language in white public space. In Scott F. Kiesling & Christina Bratt Paulston (eds.), Intercultural discourse and communication: The essential readings, 180–197. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley Online Library.Google Scholar

  • Alim, H. Samy & Django Paris. Whose language gap? Critical and culturally sustaining pedagogies as necessary challenges to racializing hegemony. In Avineri, Netta, Eric Johnson, Shirley Brice-Heath, Teresa McCarty, Elinor Ochs, Tamar Kremer-Sadlik, Susan Blum, Ana Celia Zentella, Jonathan Rosa, Nelson Flores, H. Samy Alim & Django Paris. 2015. Invited forum: Bridging the “language gap”. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 25(1). 79–81.

  • Alim, H. Samy & Geneva Smitherman. 2012. Articulate while black: Barack Obama, language, and race in the US. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Avineri, Netta, Eric Johnson, Shirley Brice-Heath, Teresa McCarty, Elinor Ochs, Tamar Kremer-Sadlik, Susan Blum, Ana Celia Zentella, Jonathan Rosa, Nelson Flores, H. Samy Alim & Django Paris. 2015. Invited forum: Bridging the “language gap”. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 25(1). 66–86.Google Scholar

  • Baldwin, Sam. 2012. Transcript of George Zimmerman’s call to the police. https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/326700-full-transcript-zimmerman.html (accessed 20 April 2016).

  • Black Lives Matter. 2016. Online: http://blacklivesmatter.com (accessed 10 April 2016).

  • Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David (2016). Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 6.0.16, retrieved 5 April 2016 from http://www.praat.org.

  • Bonilla-Silva, Eduardo. 2014. Racism without racists: Color-blind racism and the persistence of racial inequality in the United States. Third edition. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

  • Bonilla, Yarimar & Jonathan Rosa. 2015. #Ferguson: Digital protest, hashtag ethnography, and the racial politics of social media in the United States. American Ethnologist 42. 4–17.Google Scholar

  • Bucholtz, Mary. 2001. The whiteness of nerds: Superstandard english and racial markedness. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 11(1). 84–100.Google Scholar

  • Bucholtz, Mary. 2010. White kids: Language, race, and styles of youth identity. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Cheng, Cheng & Mark Hoekstra. 2013. Does Strengthening Self-Defense Law Deter Crime or Escalate Violence? Evidence from Expansions to Castle Doctrine. 43(3): 821–854.

  • Coates, Ta-Nehisi. 2015. Between the world and me. New York: Spiegel & Grau.Google Scholar

  • Collins, Patricia Hill. 2004. Black sexual politics: African Americans, gender, and the new racism. Routledge.

  • Delgado, Richard & Jean Stefancic. 2004. Understanding words that wound. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.Google Scholar

  • Du Bois, John W. 2007. The stance triangle. In Robert Englebretson (ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 164), 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Duranti, A. 2009. The relevance of Husserl’s theory to language socialization. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 19(2). 205–226.Google Scholar

  • Eckert, Penelope. 2008. Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(4). 453–476.Google Scholar

  • Goodwin, Charles. 1994. Professional vision. American Anthropologist 96(3). 606–633.Google Scholar

  • Heller, Monica. 2011. Paths to postnationalism: A critical ethnography of language and identity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Hill, Jane H. 1998. Language, race, and white public space. American Anthropologist 100(3). 680–689.Google Scholar

  • Hill, Jane H. 2008. The everyday language of white racism. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

  • hooks, bell. 2000. All about love: New visions. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar

  • Hymes, Dell. 1972. On communicative competence. Sociolinguistics. 269–293.

  • Irvine, Judith T & Susan Gal. 2009. Language ideology and linguistic differentiation.In Alessandro Duranti (ed.), Linguistic anthropology: A reader, 2nd edn, 402–434. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

  • Jones, D Marvin. 2013. He’s a black male-something is wrong with him: The role of race in the stand your ground debate. U. Miami L. Rev. 68. 1025.Google Scholar

  • Kiesling, Scott. 2001. Stances of whiteness and hegemony in fraternity men’s discourse. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 11(1). 101–115.Google Scholar

  • Matsuda, Mari J., Charles R. Lawrence III, Richard Delgado, & Kimberlè Williams Crenshaw. 1993. Words that wound: Critical race theory, assaultive speech, and the first amendment. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.Google Scholar

  • McWhorter, John. 2013. “Rachel Jeantel Explained, Linguistically.” Time. Online: http://ideas.time.com/2013/06/28/rachel-jeantel-explained-linguistically/ (accessed 10 April 2016).

  • Mendoza-Denton, Norma. 1995. Silence and authority in the Anita Hill-Clarence Thomas hearings. In Kira Hall and Mary Bucholtz (eds.), Gender articulated: Language and the socially constructed self, 51–66. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Mendoza-Denton, Norma. 2008. Homegirls: Language and cultural practice among Latina youth gangs. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

  • Nelson, Debra. 2013. George Zimmerman trial final jury instructions. Online: http://www.scribd.com/doc/153354467/George-Zimmerman-Trial-Final-Jury-Instructions (accessed 15 October 2013).

  • Ochs, Elinor. 1996. Linguistic resources for socializing humanity. In Gumperz, John J. and Stephen C. Levinson, Rethinking linguistic relativity, 407–438. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Rickford, John R. 1999. African American Vernacular English: Features, evolution, educational implications. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Rickford, John R. 2013 “Rachel Jeantel’s language in the Zimmerman trial.” Language Log. Online: http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=5161.

  • Rickford, John R. 2016. Language and linguistics on trial: Hearing vernacular speakers in courtrooms and beyond. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Linguistic Society of America.

  • Rickford, John R., & Sharese King. 2013. “Justice for Jeantels: Fighting Linguistic Prejudice and Racial Inequality in Courts and Schools, After Florida v. Zimmerman.” New Ways of Analyzing Variation 42. Pittsburgh.

  • Rosa, Jonathan. Forthcoming. Looking like a language, sounding like a race: Inequality and ingenuity in the learning of latinidad. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Silverstein, Michael. 2001. The limits of awareness. In Alessandro Duranti (ed.), Linguistic anthropology: A reader, 1st edn, 382–401. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar

  • Silverstein, Michael. 2005. Axes of evals. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 15(1). 6–22.Google Scholar

  • Smitherman, Geneva. 2000. Black talk: Words and phrases from the hood to the amen corner. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

  • Spears, Arthur K. 1997. African-American language use: Ideology and so-called obscenity. In Mufwene, Salikoko S., Guy Bailey, John Baugh, and John R. Rickford (eds.), African-American English 226–250, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • State of Florida v. George Zimmerman. 2013. CF 1083 AXXX (The Circuit Court of the Eighteenth Judicial Circuit, in and for Seminole County, Florida, July 2013).

  • Sullivan, Ronald Jr. 2013. “Stand Your Ground” Laws: Civil Rights and Public Safety Implications of the Expanded Use of Deadly Force: Hearing Before the S. Comm. On the Constitution, Civil Rights and Human Rights of the S. Comm on the Judiciary, 113th Cong. Online: http://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/10-29-13SullivanTestimony.pdf (accessed 10 April 2016).

  • Trechter, Sara & Mary Bucholtz. 2001. Introduction: White Noise: Bringing Language into Whiteness Studies. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 11(1). 3–21.Google Scholar

About the article

Tyanna Slobe

Tyanna Slobe is a PhD student in the Department of Anthropology at the University of California Los Angeles. As a Linguistic Anthropologist, her research interests include intersections of language and identity, socioeconomic mobility, gender, embodiment, and media. She conducts fieldwork in Santiago, Chile.


Published Online: 2016-08-24

Published in Print: 2016-09-01


Citation Information: Text & Talk, Volume 36, Issue 5, Pages 613–635, ISSN (Online) 1860-7349, ISSN (Print) 1860-7330, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2016-0026.

Export Citation

©2016 by De Gruyter Mouton.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in