Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Text & Talk

An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse & Communication Studies

Ed. by Sarangi, Srikant


IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 0.426
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.724

CiteScore 2017: 0.63

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.326
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.625

Online
ISSN
1860-7349
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 37, Issue 2

Issues

A rose is more than a rose … the diatextual constitution of subjects and objects

Giuseppe Mininni
  • Corresponding author
  • Department of Education, Psychology, Communication, University of Bari, Palazzo Chiaia Napolitano, Via Crisanzio 42, 70121 Bari, Italy
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Amelia Manuti
  • Department of Education, Psychology, Communication, University of Bari, Palazzo Chiaia Napolitano, Via Crisanzio 42, 70121 Bari, Italy
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2017-03-03 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2017-0005

Abstract

This paper integrates contributions coming from psychology with a phenomenological and semiotic perspective and focuses on the relationship of reciprocal constitution between “Subject” and “Object.” This relationship is evoked through radically different concepts such as the notions of “experience,” “consciousness” and “embodiment,” focusing attention on “discourse” as a macro-procedure generating the mutual link between Subject and Object. Therefore, the relationship between subject and object is identifiable through the text, namely “diatext.” It will be further argued that human beings act as “diatexters” of their existence in the world. Accordingly, psycho-discursive practices have the performative power to constitute both objects and subjects because they offer a creative solution by interlacing the “Body-Mind-Problem” to the “Mind-Culture-Problem.” In detail, the discursive resource granted by metaphors may be recognized as a modelling matrix embodying thought, as the interweaving of conceptual fields and as reasoning processes.

Keywords: discourse; agency; (inter)subjectivity; diatext; metaphor

References

  • Andracht, Fernando & Mariela Michel. 2005. A semiotic reflection on self interpretation and identity. Theory & Psychology 15(1). 51–75.Google Scholar

  • Arendt, Hannah. 1978. The Human Condition. The University of Chicago Press: ChicagoGoogle Scholar

  • Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1979. Estetika slovesnogo tvorcestva. Moskva: Izdatel’stvo «Iskusstvo.Google Scholar

  • Bayer, B. & J. Shotter (eds.). 1999. Reconstructing the psychological subject: Bodies, practices, technologies. London: Sage.Google Scholar

  • Benveniste, Emile. 1966. Problèmes de linguistique générale. Paris: Dunot.Google Scholar

  • Berlin, James. 1993. Poststructuralism, semiotics, and social-epistemic rhetoric: Converging agendas. In Theresa Enos & Stuart Brown (eds.), Defining the new rhetorics, 137–176. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

  • Bruner, Jerome. 1990. Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard College.Google Scholar

  • Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar

  • Deely, John. 2006. The literal, the metaphorical, and the price of semiotics. An essay on philosophy of language and the doctrine of signs. Semiotica 16(1/4). 9–74.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fairbanks, Matthew. 1976. Peirce on man as a language. A textual interpretation. Transactions of Charles Sanders Peirce Society XII(1). 18–32.Google Scholar

  • Fairclough, Norman & Ruth Wodak. 1997. Critical discourse analysis. In Teun Van Dijk (ed.), Discourse as social interaction, 258–284, London: Sage.Google Scholar

  • Foucault, Michal. 1971. L’ordre du discours. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

  • Gergen, Kenneth. 1985. The social constructionist movement in modern psychology. American Psychologist 40. 266–275.Google Scholar

  • Gergen, Kenneth. 2001. Psychological science in a postmodern context. American Psychologist 56(10). 803–813.Google Scholar

  • Gergen, Mary (ed.). 1988. Feminist thought and the structure of knowledge. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar

  • Giles, Howard & Coupland, Justine. 1991. Accommodation Theory: Communication, Context, and Consequence. In Giles, Howard and Coupland, Justine (ed.), Contexts of Accommodation. Cambridge University Press: New YorkGoogle Scholar

  • Habermas, Jurgen. 1985. The theory of communicative action. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar

  • Halliday, Michael. 1978. Language as social semiotic. The interpretation of language and meaning, London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar

  • Harré, Rom. 1998. The singular self. An introduction to the psychology of personhood. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

  • Howarth, David. 2000. Discourse. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar

  • Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Leiman, Mikael. 2002. Toward semiotic dialogism: The role of sign mediation in the dialogical self. Theory & Psychology 12(2). 221–235.Google Scholar

  • Lotman, Yuri. 1984. O semiosfere semeiotike. Sign system studies 17. 5–23. (Italian Translation 1985 la semiosfera, l’asimmetria ed il dialogo nelle strutture pensanti. Venezia: Marsilio)Google Scholar

  • Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1960. Signes. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

  • Mininni, Giuseppe. 1977. Fondamenti della significazione. Bari: Dedalo.Google Scholar

  • Mininni, Giuseppe. 1992. Diatesti. Psicosemiotica del discorso sociale. Napoli: Liguori.Google Scholar

  • Mininni, Giuseppe. 1999. Diatexts we mean (and live) by. European Journal for Semiotic Studies 11. 609–628.Google Scholar

  • Mininni, Giuseppe. 2003. Il discorso come forma di vita. Napoli: Liguori.Google Scholar

  • Mininni, Giuseppe. 2005. Diatexts as a mirror of human complexity. World Futures 61. 163–175.Google Scholar

  • Mininni, Giuseppe, Rodolphe Ghiglione & Edith Sales Wuillemin. 1995. The interlocutor as a diatextual frame. Journal of Pragmatics 24. 471–487.Google Scholar

  • Ong, Walter. 1981. Orality and literacy. London: Methuen.Google Scholar

  • Parker, Ian. 1998. Realism, relativism and critique in Psychology. In Ian Parker (ed.), Social constructionism, discourse and realism, 1–9. London: Sage.Google Scholar

  • Peirce, Charles. 1931–1935. Collected papers. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

  • Petrilli, Susan. 2006. Meaning, metaphor, and interpretation. Modeling new worlds. Semiotica 161(1/4). 75–118.Google Scholar

  • Rennie, David. 2000. Grounded theory methodology as methodical hermeneutics: Reconciling realism and relativism. Theory and Psychology 10(4). 481–502.Google Scholar

  • Ronchi, Rocco. 2007. Parlare in neolingua. Come si fabbrica una lingua totalitaria. In Massimo Recalcati (ed.), Forme contemporanee del totalitarismo, 44–60. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.Google Scholar

  • Salvatore, Sergio & Jan Valsiner. 2008. Idiographic science on its way: Towards making sense of psychology. In Jan Valsiner, Sergio Salvatore, Sarah Strout-Yagodzinsky & Joshua Clegg (eds.), Yearbook of idiographic science, 5–28. Roma: Giorgio Firreira Group.Google Scholar

  • Sampson, Edward. 1989. The deconstruction of the self. In John Shotter & Kenneth Gergen (eds.), Texts of identity, 1–19. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

  • Sebeok, Thomas. 1986. I think I am a verb. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar

  • Shotter, John & Gergen, Kenneth. 1989. Texts of Identity. London: SageGoogle Scholar

  • Slama-Cazacu, Tatiana. 1961. Langage et contexte. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

  • Stam, Henderikus. 2004. The dialogical self, meaning and theory: Making the subject. In William Smythe & Angelina Baydala (eds.), Studies of how the mind publicly enfolds into being, 3–28. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar

  • Stam, Henderikus. 2006. Introduction: Reclaiming the social in social psychology. Theory & Psychology 16. 587–595.Google Scholar

  • Wetherell, Margaret. 2008. Subjectivity or psycho-discursive practices? Investigating complex intersectional identities. Subjectivity 22. 73–81.Google Scholar

  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1953. Philosophische Untersuchungen. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

About the article

Giuseppe Mininni

Giuseppe Mininni is Full Professor of Psychology of Communication and Cultural Psychology at the University of Bari. His main interests are pragmatics and social psychology of discourse.

Amelia Manuti

Amelia Manuti (PhD in Psychology of Communication) is Researcher in Work and Organizational Psychology at the University of Bari. Her main research interests are sense-making processes and discursive practices within the organizational context.


Published Online: 2017-03-03

Published in Print: 2017-03-01


Citation Information: Text & Talk, Volume 37, Issue 2, Pages 243–263, ISSN (Online) 1860-7349, ISSN (Print) 1860-7330, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2017-0005.

Export Citation

©2017 by De Gruyter Mouton.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Altomare Enza Zagaria, Rosa Scardigno, Caterina Colonna, and Giuseppe Mininni
PSICOLOGIA DELLA SALUTE, 2018, Number 2, Page 70
[2]
Michela Cortini and Daniela Converso
Frontiers in Psychology, 2018, Volume 9
[3]
Elena Faccio, Giuseppe Mininni, and Michele Rocelli
Culture & Psychology, 2017, Page 1354067X1773550

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in