Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
In This Section

Theoretical Linguistics

An Open Peer Review Journal

Editor-in-Chief: Krifka, Manfred

Ed. by Gärtner, Hans-Martin

4 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.864
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.744

CiteScore 2016: 0.72

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.298
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.719

Online
ISSN
1613-4060
See all formats and pricing
In This Section
Volume 31, Issue 3 (Nov 2005)

Issues

On the limits of the Davidsonian approach: The case of copula sentences.

Claudia Maienborn
Published Online: 2005-11-11 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/thli.2005.31.3.275

Abstract

Since Donald Davidson’s seminal work ‘‘The Logical Form of Action Sentences’’ (1967) event arguments have become an integral component of virtually every semantic theory. Over the past years Davidson’s proposal has been continuously extended such that nowadays event(uality) arguments are generally associated not only with action verbs but with predicates of all sorts. The reasons for such an extension are seldom explicitly justified. Most problematical in this respect is the case of stative expressions. By taking a closer look at copula sentences the present study assesses the legitimacy of stretching the Davidsonian notion of events and discusses its consequences. A careful application of some standard eventuality diagnostics (perception reports, combination with locative modifiers and manner adverbials) as well as some new diagnostics (behavior of certain degree adverbials) reveals that copular expressions do not behave as expected under a Davidsonian perspective: they fail all eventuality tests, regardless of whether they represent stage-level or individual-level predicates. In this respect, copular expressions pattern with stative verbs like know, hate, and resemble, which in turn differ sharply from state verbs like stand, sit, and sleep. The latter pass all of the eventuality tests and therefore qualify as true ‘‘Davidsonian state’’ expressions. On the basis of these empirical observations and taking up ideas of Kim (1969, 1976) and Asher (1993, 2000), an alternative account of copular expressions (and stative verbs) is provided, according to which the copula introduces a referential argument for a temporally bound property exemplification (= ‘‘Kimian state’’). Considerations on some logical properties, viz. closure conditions and the latent infinite regress of eventualities, suggest that supplementing Davidsonian eventualities with Kimian states may yield not only a more adequate analysis of copula sentences but also a better understanding of eventualities in general.

About the article

Published Online: 2005-11-11

Published in Print: 2005-11-18



Citation Information: Theoretical Linguistics, ISSN (Online) 1613-4060, ISSN (Print) 0301-4428, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/thli.2005.31.3.275. Export Citation

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[3]
Wolfram Hinzen
Philosophical Psychology, 2013, Volume 26, Number 1, Page 1
[4]
Helga Gese, Claudia Maienborn, and Britta Stolterfoht
Journal of Germanic Linguistics, 2011, Volume 23, Number 02, Page 101
[5]
Sebastian Bücking
Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, 2010, Volume 29, Number 1
[7]
Gillian Ramchand
Language and Linguistics Compass, 2007, Volume 1, Number 5, Page 476

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in