Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton November 11, 2005

States and modification: A reply to Maienborn

  • Susan Rothstein
From the journal Theoretical Linguistics

Abstract

This very interesting paper investigates differences between copula verbs on the one hand, and ‘truly eventive’ verbs, on the other, discussing a number of important topics, including the effect of word order on modification relations, and the difference between internal and external event modification. The core claim of the paper is that states and eventualities have a different logical structure, and that the differences between them follow from this. Rather than commenting directly on the arguments made in the paper, I am going to concentrate in my response on this issue, trying to show that statives and eventualities are more similar than Maienborn assumes, and suggesting that the differences between them might be explained without postulating different logical structures.

:
Published Online: 2005-11-11
Published in Print: 2005-11-18

Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG

Downloaded on 28.3.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/thli.2005.31.3.375/html
Scroll to top button