Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Theoretical Linguistics

An Open Peer Review Journal

Editor-in-Chief: Krifka, Manfred

Ed. by Gärtner, Hans-Martin

4 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.864
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.744

CiteScore 2016: 0.72

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.555
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 1.105

Online
ISSN
1613-4060
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 33, Issue 3 (Dec 2007)

Issues

The wolf in sheep's clothing: Against a new judgement-driven imperialism

Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky
  • Independent Junior Research Group Neurotypology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences.
/ Matthias Schlesewsky
  • Department of Germanic Linguistics, University of Marburg.
Published Online: 2007-12-13 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/TL.2007.021

Abstract

In this commentary, we discuss the limitations of linguistic judgements by comparing them to a variety of other empirical data types. In particular, we show that judgements are inherently multimensional in that they incorporate a range of linguistic and extra-linguistic influences, which cannot be teased apart by only considering the final judgement itself. Judgements of the gradient and time-insensitive type therefore give rise to the same interpretation problems as those faced by introspection. Thus, while we agree with Featherston that an improvement of data replicability in theoretical linguistics is highly desirable, we disagree with his claim that gradient judgements can provide significantly more grammatically-relevant information than other types of empirical data.

About the article

Published Online: 2007-12-13

Published in Print: 2007-12-11


Citation Information: Theoretical Linguistics, ISSN (Print) 0301-4428, ISSN (Print) 1613-4060, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/TL.2007.021.

Export Citation

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in