Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details

Theoretical Linguistics

An Open Peer Review Journal

Editor-in-Chief: Krifka, Manfred

Ed. by Gärtner, Hans-Martin


IMPACT FACTOR 2015: 1.167
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.302
Rank 44 out of 179 in category Linguistics in the 2015 Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report/Social Sciences Edition

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.298
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.719
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2015: 0.650

49,00 € / $74.00 / £37.00*

Online
ISSN
1613-4060
See all formats and pricing



Select Volume and Issue

Issues

30,00 € / $42.00 / £23.00

Get Access to Full Text

Referential CPs and DPs: An operator movement account

Liliane Haegeman / Barbara Ürögdi

Correspondence address: Ghent University,

Citation Information: Theoretical Linguistics. Volume 36, Issue 2-3, Pages 111–152, ISSN (Online) 1613-4060, ISSN (Print) 0301-4428, DOI: 10.1515/thli.2010.008, January 2011

Publication History

Published Online:
2011-01-28

Abstract

The empirical focus of this paper is the syntax and semantics of embedded clauses, and in particular, finite object clauses that are weak islands for extraction and incompatible with main clause phenomena (MCP). Such CPs (which subsume factive complements) have been shown to have referential properties both distributionally and in terms of their semantics (de Cuba & Ürögdi, Eliminating factivity from syntax: Sentential complements in Hungarian, John Benjamins, 2009a). By analogy with proposals for the derivation of adverbial clauses (Haegeman, Main clause phenomena and intervention, Zentrum für Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, 2009a, English Language and Linguistics 13: 385– 408, b, The internal syntax of adverbial clauses, 2010), this paper develops a movement derivation for such referential embedded clauses. The paper updates a tradition of work on ‘reduced’ or ‘impoverished’ complement clauses and shows that their referential property can be made to follow from event relativization, which in turn accounts for the constraints on the syntax of their left periphery. Looking at the feature make-up of the operator enables us to make fine-grained predictions with respect to the availability of various MCP in these clauses. Pursuing insights due to Campbell (Studia Linguistica 50: 161–188, 1996), Aboh (The morphosyntax of complement-head sequences. Clause structure and word order patterns in Kwa, Oxford University Press, 2004: 84–90), it is proposed that both referential DPs and referential clauses (RCP) are derived by operator movement. The paper thus offers further evidence for the CP/DP parallelism.

Keywords:: CP/DP parallelism; operator movement; referentiality; intervention

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Keir Moulton
Linguistic Inquiry, 2015, Volume 46, Number 2, Page 305
[2]
Karen Lahousse, Christopher Laenzlinger, and Gabriela Soare
Lingua, 2014, Volume 143, Page 56
[3]
Lobke Aelbrecht and Liliane Haegeman
Linguistic Inquiry, 2012, Volume 43, Number 4, Page 591
[4]
Keisuke Yoshimoto
Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 2012, Volume 59, Number 3, Page 339
[5]
Boban Arsenijević and Wolfram Hinzen
Linguistic Inquiry, 2012, Volume 43, Number 3, Page 423
[6]
Wolfram Hinzen
Language Sciences, 2012, Volume 34, Number 5, Page 635
[7]
Wolfram Hinzen
Philosophical Psychology, 2013, Volume 26, Number 1, Page 1

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.