Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Theoretical Linguistics

An Open Peer Review Journal

Editor-in-Chief: Krifka, Manfred

Ed. by Gärtner, Hans-Martin

4 Issues per year

IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.864
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.744

CiteScore 2016: 0.72

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.555
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 1.105

See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 42, Issue 1-2 (Jul 2016)


Why formal semantics and primate communication make strange bedfellows

W. Tecumseh Fitch
  • Corresponding author
  • Department of Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, UZA 1, Biologiezentrum, Althanstrasse 14, 1090 Vienna, Austria
  • Email:
Published Online: 2016-07-05 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2016-0003


  • Adret, Patrice. 1992. Vocal learning induced with operant techniques: An overview. Netherlands Journal of Zoology 43. 125–142.Google Scholar

  • Aitken, Peter G. & William A. Wilson Jr. 1979. Discriminative vocal conditioning in Rhesus monkeys: Evidence for volitional control? Brain and Language 8. 227–240.Google Scholar

  • Bar-On, Dorit. 2013. Origins of meaning: Must we ‘Go Gricean’? Mind and Language 28. 342–375.Google Scholar

  • Beckers, Gabriël J.L., Johan J. Bolhuis, Kazuo Okanoya & Robert C. Berwick. 2012. Birdsong neurolinguistics: Songbird context-free grammar claim is premature. NeuroReport 23. 139–145.Google Scholar

  • Berntson, Gary G., Sarah T. Boysen, Harold R. Bauer & Michael S. Torello. 1990. Conspecific screams and laughter: Cardiac and behavioral reactions of infant chimpanzees. Developmental Psychobiology 22. 771–787.Google Scholar

  • Bugnyar, Thomas, Stephan A. Reber & Cameron Buckner. 2016. Ravens attribute visual access to unseen competitors. Nature Communications 7. 10506.Google Scholar

  • Burnstein, David D. & Peter C. Wolff. 1967. Vocal conditioning in the guinea pig. Psychonomic Science 8. 39–40.Google Scholar

  • Cheney, Dorothy L. & Robert M. Seyfarth. 1980. Vocal recognition in free-ranging vervet monkeys. Animal Behaviour 28. 362–367.Google Scholar

  • Cheney, Dorothy L. & Robert M. Seyfarth. 1992a. Meaning, reference, and intentionality in the natural vocalizations of monkeys. In T. Nishida, et al. (eds.), Topics in primatology, Volume 1, human origins, 315–330. Tokyo: Tokyo University Press.Google Scholar

  • Cheney, Dorothy L. & Robert M. Seyfarth. 1992b. Precis of ‘How monkeys see the world’. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15. 135–182.Google Scholar

  • Cheney, Dorothy L. & Robert M. Seyfarth. 1998. Why monkeys don’t have language. In G. Petersen (eds.), The Tanner lectures on human values. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.Google Scholar

  • Cheney, Dorothy L. & Robert M. Seyfarth. 2007. Baboon metaphysics: The evolution of a social mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Crockford, Catherine, Roman M. Wittig, Roger Mundry & Klaus Zuberbühler. 2012. Wild chimpanzees inform ignorant group members of danger. Current Biology 22. 1–5.Google Scholar

  • Darwin, Charles. 1872. The expression of the emotions in man and animals. London: John Murray.Google Scholar

  • Davila Ross, Michael J. Marina Owren & Elke Zimmerman. 2009. Reconstructing the evolution of laughter in great apes and humans. Current Biology 19. 1106–1111.Google Scholar

  • Eibl-Eibesfeldt, Irenäus. 1973. The expressive behaviour of the deaf-and blind-born. In M. Von Cranach & J. Vine (eds.), Social communication and movement, 163–194. London: Academic.Google Scholar

  • Fischer, Julia, Brandon C. Wheeler & James P. Higham. 2015. Is there any evidence for vocal learning in chimpanzee food calls? Current Biology 25. 1028–1029.Google Scholar

  • Fitch, W. Tecumseh. 1997. Vocal tract length and formant frequency dispersion correlate with body size in rhesus macaques. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 102. 1213–1222.Google Scholar

  • Fitch, W. Tecumseh. 2006. The biology and evolution of music: A comparative perspective. Cognition 100. 173–215.Google Scholar

  • Fitch, W. Tecumseh. 2009. Prolegomena to a future science of biolinguistics. Biolinguistics 3. 283–320.Google Scholar

  • Fitch, W. Tecumseh. 2014. Toward a computational framework for cognitive biology: Unifying approaches from cognitive neuroscience and comparative cognition. Physics of Life Reviews 11. 329–364.Google Scholar

  • Fitch, W. Tecumseh. 2015. Book review: Evolving pragmatics. Current Biology 25. R1110–R1112.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fitch, W. Tecumseh. & Angela D. Friederici. 2012. Artificial grammar learning meets formal language theory: An overview. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 367. 1933–1955.Google Scholar

  • Fitch, W. Tecumseh. & Marc D. Hauser. 2004. Computational constraints on syntactic processing in a nonhuman primate. Science 303. 377–380.Google Scholar

  • Fitch, W. Tecumseh, Jürgen Neubauer & Hanspeter Herzel. 2002. Calls out of chaos: The adaptive significance of nonlinear phenomena in mammalian vocal production. Animal Behaviour 63. 407–418.Google Scholar

  • Fitch, W. Tecumseh & Klaus Zuberbühler. 2013. Primate precursors to human language: Beyond discontinuity. In E. Zimmerman et al. (eds.), The evolution of emotional communication, 26–48. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Grice, H. P. 1957. Meaning. Philosophical Review, 66(3), 377–388.Google Scholar

  • Hailman, Jack P. & Millicent S. Ficken. 1987. Combinatorial animal communication with computable syntax: Chick-a-dee calling qualifies as ‘language’ by structural linguistics. Animal Behavior 34. 1899–1901.Google Scholar

  • Hare, Brian, Josep Call & Michael Tomasello. 2001. Do chimpanzees know what conspecifics know? Animal Behaviour 61. 139–151.Google Scholar

  • Heinz, Jeffrey & William Idsardi. 2013. What complexity differences reveal about domains in language. Topics in Cognitive Science 5. 111–131.Google Scholar

  • Heyes, Celia M. 1998. Theory of mind in nonhuman primates. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21. 101–134.Google Scholar

  • Hoeschele, Marisa & W. Tecumseh Fitch. 2016. Phonological perception by birds: budgerigars can perceive lexical stress. Animal Cognition 19. 643–654.Google Scholar

  • Jackendoff, Ray. 2002. Foundations of language. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Jäger, Gerhard & James Rogers. 2012. Formal language theory: refining the Chomsky Hierarchy. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 267. 1956–1970.Google Scholar

  • Janik, Vincent M. & Peter J.B. Slater. 1998. Context-specific use suggests that bottlenose dolphin signature whistles are cohesion calls. Animal Behaviour 56. 829–838.Google Scholar

  • Katahira, Kentaro, Kenta Suzuki, Kazuo Okanoya & Masato Okada. 2011. Complex sequencing rules of birdsong can be explained by simple hidden Markov processes. PLoS One 6. e24516.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lal, Harbans. 1967. Operant control of vocal responding in rats. Psychonomic Science 8. 35–36.Google Scholar

  • Lane, Harlan. 1960. Control of vocal responding in chickens. Science 132. 37–38.Google Scholar

  • Larson, Charles R., Dwight Sutton, Eugene M. Taylor & Roger Lindeman. 1973. Sound spectral properties of conditioned vocalizations in monkeys. Phonetica 27. 100–112.Google Scholar

  • Molliver, Mark E. 1963. Operant control of vocal behavior in the cat. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 6. 197–202.Google Scholar

  • Moore, Richard. 2016. Meaning and ostension in great ape gestural communication. Animal Cognition, 19(1), 223–231.Google Scholar

  • Myers, Shirley A., James A. Horel & Henry S. Pennypacker. 1965. Operant control of vocal behavior in the monkey Cebus albifrons. Psychonomic Science 3. 389–390.Google Scholar

  • Owren, Michael J., Jacquelyn A. Dieter, Robert M. Seyfarth & Dorothy L. Cheney. (1993). Vocalizations of rhesus (Macaca mulatta) and Japanese (M. fuscata) macaques cross-fostered between species show evidence of only limited modification. Developmental Psychobiology 26. 389–406.Google Scholar

  • Patel, Aniruddh D. 2008. Music, language, and the brain. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Penn, Derek C. & Daniel J. Povinelli. 2007. On the lack of evidence that non-human animals possess anything remotely resembling a ‘theory of mind’. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 362. 731–744.Google Scholar

  • Peretz, Isabelle, Dominique Vuvan, Marie-Élaine Lagrois & Jorge L. Armony. 2015. Neural overlap in processing music and speech. Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society B 370.Google Scholar

  • Portner, Paul H. 2005. What is meaning: Fundamentals of formal semantics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Putnam, Hilary. 1975. The meaning of meaning. In K. Gunderson (ed.), Language, mind and knowledge, 131–193. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

  • Randolph, Mary C. & Barbara B. Brooks. 1967. Conditioning of a vocal response in a chimpanzee through social reinforcement. Folia Primatologica 5. 70–79.Google Scholar

  • Salzinger, Kurt & Marcus B. Waller. 1962. The operant control of vocalization in the dog. Journal of the Experimental Analysis 5. 383–389.Google Scholar

  • Schel, Anne Marijke, Simon W. Townsend, Zarin Machanda, Klaus Zuberbühler & Katie E. Slocombe. 2013. Chimpanzee alarm call production meets key criteria for intentionality. PLoS One 8. e76674.Google Scholar

  • Scott-Phillips, Thom C. 2014. Speaking our minds. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

  • Seyfarth, Robert M., Dorothy L. Cheney & Thore J. Bergman. 2005. Primate social cognition and the origins of language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9. 264–266.Google Scholar

  • Seyfarth, Robert M., Dorothy L. Cheney & Peter Marler. 1980a. Monkey responses to three different alarm calls: Evidence of predator classification and semantic communication. Science 210. 801–803.Google Scholar

  • Seyfarth, Robert M., Dorothy L. Cheney & Peter Marler. 1980b. Vervet monkey alarm calls: semantic communication in a free-ranging primate. Animal Behaviour 28. 1070–1094.Google Scholar

  • Seyfarth, Robert M. & Dorothy L. Cheney. 1997. Behavioral mechanisms underlying vocal communication in nonhuman primates. Animal Learning and Behavior 25. 249–267.Google Scholar

  • Seyfarth, Robert M. & Dorothy L. Cheney. 2003. Signalers and receivers in animal communication. Annual Review of Psychology 54. 145–173.Google Scholar

  • Sperber, Dan & Dierdre Wilson. 1986. Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • ten Cate, Carel & Kazuo Okanoya. 2012. Revisiting the syntactic abilities of non-human animals: natural vocalizations and artificial grammar learning. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 367. 1984–1994.Google Scholar

  • Tomasello, Michael. 2007. If they’re so good at grammar, then why don’t they talk? Hints from apes’ and humans’ use of gestures. Language Learning & Development 3. 133–156.Google Scholar

  • van Heijningen, Caroline A.A., Jos de Vissera, Willem Zuidema & Carel ten Cate. 2009. Simple rules can explain discrimination of putative recursive syntactic structures by a songbird species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106. 20538–20543.Google Scholar

  • Wanker, Ralf, Yasuko Sugama & Sabine Prinage. 2005. Vocal labelling of family members in spectacled parrotlets, Forpus conspicullatus. Animal Behavior 70. 111–118.Google Scholar

  • Watson, Stuart K., Simon W. Townsend, Anne M. Schel, Claudia Wilke, Emma K. Wallace, Leveda Cheng, Victoria West & Katie E. Slocombe. 2015. Vocal learning in the functionally referential food grunts of chimpanzees. Current Biology 25. 495–499.Google Scholar

  • Wheeler, Brandon C. & Julia Fischer. 2012. Functionally referential signals: A promising paradigm whose time has passed. Evolutionary Anthropology 21. 195–205.Google Scholar

  • Wilson, William A. Jr. 1975. Discriminative conditioning of vocalizations in Lemur catta. Animal Behavior 23. 432–436.Google Scholar

  • Winter, Peter, Patricia Handley, Detlev Ploog & Ditmar Schott. 1973. Ontogeny of squirrel monkey calls under normal conditions and under acoustic isolation. Behaviour 47. 230–239.Google Scholar

  • Yip, Moira J. 2006. The search for phonology in other species. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10. 442–446.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2016-07-05

Published in Print: 2016-07-01

Citation Information: Theoretical Linguistics, ISSN (Online) 1613-4060, ISSN (Print) 0301-4428, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2016-0003.

Export Citation

©2016 by De Gruyter Mouton. Copyright Clearance Center

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in