Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Theoretical Linguistics

An Open Peer Review Journal

Editor-in-Chief: Krifka, Manfred

Ed. by Gärtner, Hans-Martin

IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 2.000
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 2.343

CiteScore 2017: 0.70

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.457
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 1.318

See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 42, Issue 1-2


Compositionality and competition in monkey alert calls

Shane Steinert-Threlkeld
  • Corresponding author
  • Department of Philosophy, Stanford University, 450 Serra Mall, Bulding 90, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2016-07-05 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2016-0009


  • Arnold, Kate & Klaus Zuberbühler. 2012. Call combinations in monkeys: Compositional or idiomatic expressions? Brain and Language 120(3). 303–309. doi: .CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Call, Josep & Michael Tomasello. 2008. Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? 30 years later. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 12(5). 187–192. doi: .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cäsar, Cristiane, Klaus Zuberbühler, Robert J. Young & Richard W. Byrne. 2013. Titi monkey call sequences vary with predator location and type. Biology Letters 9(5). 20130535. doi: .CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Davidson, Donald. 1965. Theories of Meaning and Learnable Languages. In Y. Bar-Hillel, (ed.), Proceedings of the International Congress for Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science, 3–17. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.Google Scholar

  • Fodor, Jerry. 1987. Psychosemantics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Grandy, Richard E. 1989. On Grice on Language. The Journal of Philosophy 86(10). 514–525.Google Scholar

  • Grice, Herbert Paul. 1975. Logic and Conversation. In P. Cole and J. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

  • Horn, Laurence Robert. 1972. On the Semantic Properties of Logical Operators in English. PhD thesis, Los Angeles: University of California.Google Scholar

  • Millikan, Ruth Garrett. 1995. Pushmi-Pullyu Representations. Philosophical Perspectives 9. 185–200.Google Scholar

  • Premack, David & Guy Woodruff. 1978. Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4. 515–526. doi: .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Saul, Jennifer M. 2002. What is Said and Psychological Reality; Grice’s Project and Relevance Theorists’ Criticisms. Linguistics and Philosophy 25. 347–372.Google Scholar

  • Schlenker, Philippe, Emmanuel Chemla, Kate Arnold, & Klaus Zuberbühler. 2016a. Pyow-Hack Revisited: Two Analyses of Putty-nosed Monkey Alarm Calls. Lingua 171. 1–23. doi: .CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Schlenker, Philippe, Emmanuel Chemla, Anne M. Schel, James Fuller, Jean-Pierre Gautier, Jeremy Kuhn, Dunja Veselinović, Kate Arnold, Cristiane Cäsar, Sumir Keenan, Alban Lemasson, Karim Ouattara, Robin Ryder, & Klaus Zuberbühler. 2016b. Formal Monkey Linguistics. Theoretical Linguistics.

  • van Rooij, Robert & Katrin Schulz. 2004. Exhaustive Interpretation of Complex Sentences. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 13(4). 491–519. doi: .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2016-07-05

Published in Print: 2016-07-01

Citation Information: Theoretical Linguistics, Volume 42, Issue 1-2, Pages 159–171, ISSN (Online) 1613-4060, ISSN (Print) 0301-4428, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2016-0009.

Export Citation

©2016 by De Gruyter Mouton.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in