Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Theoretical Linguistics

An Open Peer Review Journal

Editor-in-Chief: Krifka, Manfred

Ed. by Gärtner, Hans-Martin

IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 2.000
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 2.343

CiteScore 2017: 0.70

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.457
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 1.318

See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 42, Issue 3-4


Pandora’s Box Opened

Hannes Rieser
  • Corresponding author
  • Faculty of Linguistics & Literary Studies, Bielefeld University, Universitätsstraße 25, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Massimo Poesio
Published Online: 2016-10-06 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2016-0015


  • Fernández, Raquel, Jonathan Ginzburg & Shalom Lappin. 2007. Classifying non-sentential utterances in dialogue: A machine learning approach. Computational Linguistics 33(3). 397–427.Google Scholar

  • Gregoromichelaki, E., Cann R. & Kempson, R. 2013a. Coordination in dialogue: subsentential speech and its implications. In L. Goldstein (ed.), Brevity, 53–73. Oxford University Press.

  • Hendriks, Petra. 2013. Asymmetries between language production and comprehension. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

  • Kallmeyer, Laura & Aravind Joshi. 2003. Factoring predicate argument and scope semantics: Underspecified semantics with LTAG. Research on Language and Computation 1(1–2). 3–58.Google Scholar

  • Muskens, Reinhard. 1996. Combining Montague semantics and discourse representation. Linguistics and Philosophy 19. 143–186.Google Scholar

  • Poesio, M. & Traum, D. 1997. Conversational actions and discourse situations. Computational Intelligence 13(3). 309–347.Google Scholar

  • Poesio, M. & H. Rieser. 2010. Completions, co-ordination and alignment in dialogue. Dialogue and Discourse 1. 1–89.Google Scholar

  • Recanati, François. 1993. Direct Reference: From Language to Thought. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Recanati, François. 2007. Perspectival thought. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar

  • Sturt, Patrick & Matthew W. Crocker. 1996. Monotonic syntactic processing: A cross-linguistic study of attachment and reanalysis. Language and Cognitive Processes 11(5). 449–494.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2016-10-06

Published in Print: 2016-10-01

Citation Information: Theoretical Linguistics, Volume 42, Issue 3-4, Pages 305–318, ISSN (Online) 1613-4060, ISSN (Print) 0301-4428, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2016-0015.

Export Citation

©2016 by De Gruyter Mouton.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Jonathan Ginzburg and Dimitra Kolliakou
Topics in Cognitive Science, 2018

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in