Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Theoretical Linguistics

An Open Peer Review Journal

Editor-in-Chief: Krifka, Manfred

Ed. by Gärtner, Hans-Martin

4 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.864
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.744

CiteScore 2016: 0.72

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.555
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 1.105

Online
ISSN
1613-4060
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 43, Issue 1-2 (Jun 2017)

Issues

Grammars as Mechanisms for Interaction: The Emergence of Language Games

Arash Eshghi
  • Corresponding author
  • School of Mathematical and Computer Sciences, Heriot-Watt University, Earl Mountbatten Building, Edinburgh EH14 4AS, UK
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Oliver Lemon
  • School of Mathematical and Computer Sciences, Heriot-Watt University, Earl Mountbatten Building, Edinburgh EH14 4AS, UK
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2017-06-07 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2017-0010

References

  • Bouzouita, Miriam & Ruth Kempson. 2006. Clitic placement in old and modern Spanish: A dynamic account. In O. N. Thomsen (ed.), Competing models of linguistic change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Cann, Ronnie, Ruth Kempson & Lutz Marten. 2005. The dynamics of language. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar

  • Eshghi, Arash & Patrick G. T. Healey. 2016. Collective contexts in conversation: Grounding by proxy. Cognitive Science 40(2). 299–324.Google Scholar

  • Eshghi, Arash, Julian Hough & Matthew Purver. 2013a. Incremental grammar induction from child-directed dialogue utterances. In Proceedings of the 4th annual workshop on Cognitive Modeling and Computational Linguistics (CMCL), 94–103. Sofia, Bulgaria: Association for Computational Linguistics.

  • Eshghi, Arash, Matthew Purver, Julian Hough & Yo Sato. 2013b. Probabilistic grammar induction in an incremental semantic framework. In CSLP, lecture notes in computer science. Springer.

  • Eshghi, Arash, Chris Howes, Eleni Gregoromichelaki, Julian Hough & Matthew Purver. 2015. Feedback in conversation as incremental semantic update. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Computational Semantics (IWCS 2015). London, UK: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar

  • Eshghi, Arash & Oliver Lemon. 2014. How domain-general can we be? Learning incremental dialogue systems without dialogue acts. In Proceedings of Semdial 2014 (DialWatt).

  • Ginzburg, Jonathan. 2012. The interactive stance: Meaning for conversation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Ginzburg, Jonathan & Robin Cooper. 2004. Clarification, ellipsis, and the nature of contextual updates in dialogue. Linguistics and Philosophy 27(3). 297–365.Google Scholar

  • Healey, Patrick G. T. 2008. Interactive misalignment: The role of repair in the development of group sub-languages. In R. Cooper & R. Kempson (eds.), Language in flux. London, UK: College Publications.Google Scholar

  • Hiller, Sarah & Raquel Fernández. 2016. A data-driven investigation of corrective feedback on subject omission errors in first language acquisition. In Proceedings of the 20th SIGNLL Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CONNL).

  • Kalatzis, Dimitris, Arash Eshghi & Oliver Lemon. 2016. Bootstrapping incremental dialogue systems: Using linguistic knowledge to learn from minimal data. In Proceedings of the NIPS 2016 workshop on learning methods for dialogue, Barcelona.

  • Kempson, Ruth, Wilfried Meyer-Viol & Dov Gabbay. 2001. Dynamic syntax: The flow of language understanding. New Jersey, US: Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Mills, Gregory J. 2014. Dialogue in joint activity: Complementarity, convergence and conventionalization. New Ideas in Psychology 32. 158–173.Google Scholar

  • Poesio, Massimo & Hannes Rieser. 2010. Completions, coordination, and alignment in dialogue. Dialogue and Discourse 1. 1–89.Google Scholar

  • Saxton, Matthew, Phillip Backley & Clare Gallaway. 2005. Negative input for grammatical errors: Effects after a lag of 12 weeks. Journal of Child Language 32(03). 643–672.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2017-06-07

Published in Print: 2017-06-27


Citation Information: Theoretical Linguistics, ISSN (Online) 1613-4060, ISSN (Print) 0301-4428, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2017-0010.

Export Citation

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston. Copyright Clearance Center

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in