Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Theoretical Linguistics

An Open Peer Review Journal

Editor-in-Chief: Krifka, Manfred

Ed. by Gärtner, Hans-Martin

4 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.864
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.744

CiteScore 2016: 0.72

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.555
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 1.105

Online
ISSN
1613-4060
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 43, Issue 3-4

Issues

What Language Is

Wolfram Hinzen
  • Corresponding author
  • Catalan Institution for Research and Advanced Studies (ICREA), 08010 Barcelona, Spain
  • Departament de Traducció i Ciències del Llenguatge, Grammar & Cognition lab, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, 08002 Barcelona, Spain
  • FIDMAG Germanes Hospitalaries Research Foundation, Benito Menni Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2017-09-29 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2017-0020

References

  • Apperly, I. A. & S. A. Butterfill. 2009. Do humans have two systems to track beliefs and belief-like states? Psychological Review 116(4). 953.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bartolucci, G., S. J. Pierce & D. Streiner. 1980. Cross-sectional studies of grammatical morphemes in autistic and mentally retarded children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 10. 39–50.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Berwick, R. & N. Chomsky. 2011. The biolinguistic program: The current state of its evolution and development. In A. M. Di Sciullo & C. Aguero (eds.), Biolinguistic Investigations, 19–41. Cambridge: MIT Press, MA.Google Scholar

  • Boucher, J. 2012. Research Review: Structural language in autistic spectrum disorder – characteristics and causes. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 53(3). 219–233.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Buttelmann, D., F. Buttelmann, M. Carpenter, J. Call & M. Tomasello. 2017. Great apes distinguish true from false beliefs in an interactive helping task. PLoS ONE 12(4). e0173793. doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Buttelmann, D., M. Carpenter & M. Tomasello. 2009. Eighteen-month-old infants show false belief understanding in an active helping paradigm. Cognition 112. 337–342.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Call, J., B. Hare, M. Carpenter & M. Tomasello 2004. Unwilling’ versus ‘unable’: chimpanzees’ understanding of human intentional action. Developmental Science 7. 488–498. PMID: 15484596CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Call, J. & M. Tomasello. 1999. A nonverbal false belief task: The performance of children and great apes. Child Development 70. 381–395. PMID: 10218261CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chomsky, N. 2007. Approaching UG from below. In U. Sauerland & H.‑M. Gärtner (eds.), Interfaces + Recursion=Language? Chomsky’s Minimalism and the view from syntax‑semantics, 1–29. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Colle, L., S. Baron-Cohen, S. Wheelwright & H. van der Lely. 2008. Narrative discourse in adults with high-functioning autism or Asperger syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 38. 28–40.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Davidson, D. 2010. Problems of rationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Davies, C., C. Andrés-Roqueta & C. Frazier Norbury. 2016. Referring expressions and structural language abilities in children with specific language impairment: A pragmatic tolerance account. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 144. 98–113.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • de Villiers, J. 2014. What kind of concepts need language? Language Sciences 46. 100–114.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • de Villiers, J. 2016. Invited plenary: Are concepts always first? University of Toronto Interdisciplinary Symposium on the Mind, Toronto, Feb 6, 2016.Google Scholar

  • Eigsti, I.–M., L. Bennetto & M. Dadlani 2007. Beyond pragmatics: morphosyntactic development in autism. Journal of autism and developemental disorders 37. 1007–1023.Google Scholar

  • Fay, W. & A. Schuler. 1980. Emerging language in autistic children. Baltimore: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar

  • Gallistel, C. R. 2009. The foundational abstractions. In M. Piattelli‑Palmarini, J. Uriagereka & P. Salaburu (eds.), Of minds and language, 58–73. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Gussenhoven, C. 2008. Types of focus in English. In Chungmin Lee, Matthew Gordon & Daniel Büring (eds.), Topic and focus. Cross-linguistic perspectives on meaning and intonation, 83–100. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

  • Heyes, C. 1998. Theory of mind in nonhuman primates. Behavioural and Brain Sciences 21. 101–148.Google Scholar

  • Heyes, C. 2015. Animal mindreading: what’s the problem? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 22. 313–327.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Heyes, C. & C. D. Frith. 2014. The cultural evolution of mind reading. Science 20 June 2014 344. 6190.Google Scholar

  • Hinzen, W. 2007. An essay on names and truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Hinzen, W. 2014. The rationality of Case. Language Sciences 46(B). 133–151.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hinzen, W. & K. Schroeder 2015. Is ‘the first person’ a linguistic concept essentially? Journal of Consciousness Studies 22(11–12). 149–179.Google Scholar

  • Hinzen, W. 2015. Nothing is hidden: Contextualism and the syntax-semantics interface. Mind & Language 30(3). 259–291.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hinzen, W., M. Sheehan & U. Reichard 2014. Intensionality, grammar, and the sententialist hypothesis. In Peter Kosta, Steven Franks, Teodora Radeva-Bork & Lilia Schuerks (eds.), Minimalism and beyond. radicalizing the interfaces, 315–349. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.Google Scholar

  • Jackendoff, R. 2002. Foundations of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Jordan, R. R. 1989. An experimental comparison of the understanding and use of speaker-addressee personal pronouns in autistic children. British Journal of Disorders of Communication 24. 169–179.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kaminski, J., J. Call & M. Tomasello. 2008. Chimpanzees know what others know, but not what they believe. Cognition 109. 224–234.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Krachun, C., M. Carpenter, J. Call & M. Tomasello. 2010. A new change-of-contents false belief test: Children and chimpanzees compared. International Journal of Comparative Psychology 23. 145–165.Google Scholar

  • Krupenye, C., F. Kano, S. Hirata, J. Call & M. Tomasello. 2016. Great apes anticipate agents’ actions based on their false beliefs. Science 354. 110–114.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kulke, L., M. Reiß, H. Krist & H. Rakoczy. 2017. How robust are anticipatory looking measures of Theory of Mind? Replication attempts across the life span. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar

  • Lee, A. & R. P. Hobson. 1994. I, you, me, and autism: An experimental study. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 24(2). 155–176.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lowe, E. J. 2007. Personal agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Martin, T. X. & W. Hinzen. 2014. The grammar of the essential indexical. Lingua 148. 95–117.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Miller, J. 2014. Realism, truthmakers, and language: A study in meta-ontology and the relationship between language and metaphysics. PhD Thesis, University of Durham.Google Scholar

  • Mizuno, A., Y. Liu, D. Williams, T. Keller, N. Minshew & M. Just. 2011. The neural basis of deictic shifting in linguistic perspective-taking in high-functioning autism. Brain 134. 2422–2435.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Naigles, Letitia R. & Saime Tek. 2017. Form is easy, meaning is hard’ revisited: (re) characterizing the strengths and weaknesses of language in children with autism spectrum disorder. WIREs Cognitive Science, e1438.Google Scholar

  • Naigles, L. R., E. Kelty, R. Jaffery & D. Fein. 2011. Abstractness and continuity in the syntactic development of young children with autism. Autism Research 4(6). 422–437.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Newton, A. M. & J. G. de Villiers. 2007. Thinking while talking: Adults fail nonverbal false-belief reasoning. Psychological Science 18(7). 574–579.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Norbury, C., T. Gemmel & R. Paul. 2014. Pragmatics abilities in narrative production: a cross-disorder comparison. Journal of Child Language 41(3). 1–26.Google Scholar

  • Nordmeyer, A E. 2011. To be or not to be: examining the role of language in a concept of negation. Theses, Dissertations, and Projects 286. Psychology Department, Smith College, Northhampton, USA.Google Scholar

  • Norrelgen, F., E. Fernell, M. Eriksson, Å. Hedvall, C. Persson, M. Sjölin, C. Gillberg & L. Kjellmer. 2015. Children with autism spectrum disorders who do not develop phrase speech in the preschool years. Autism 19(8). 934–943.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Obeid, R., P. J. Brooks, K. L. Powers, K. Gillespie-Lynch & J. A. G. Lum. 2016. Statistical learning in specific language impairment and autism spectrum disorder: a metaanalysis. Frontiers in psychology 7. 1245.Google Scholar

  • Park, C. J., G. W. Yelland, J. R. Taffe & K. M. Gray. 2012. Brief report: the relationship between language skills, adaptive behavior, and emotional and behavior problems in pre-schoolers with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 42. 2761–2766.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Penn, D. C., K. J. Holyoak & D. J. Povinelli. 2008. Darwin’s mistake: Explaining the discontinuity between human and nonhuman minds. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31. 109–178.Google Scholar

  • Pierce, S. & G. Bartolucci. 1977. A syntactic investigation of verbal autistic, mentally-retarded, and normal children. Journal of Autism and Childhood Schizophrenia 7. 121–134.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Raposo, E. & J. Uriagereka. 1995. Two types of small clauses (Toward a syntax of theme/ rheme relations). In A. Cardinaletti & M. T. Guasti (eds.), Syntax and semantics: Small clauses, 179–206. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

  • Reboul, A. (2017) Cognition and Communication in the Evolution of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Reichard, U. 2013. Grammar, ontology, and the unity of meaning. Department of Philosophy, Durham University PhD Thesis.Google Scholar

  • Reichard, U. & W. Hinzen. 2016. Are verbs names of events? A review of the evidence. In P. Stalmaszczyk (ed.), Philosophical and linguistic analyses of reference, 43–65. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

  • Schroeder, K., M. Subirats, J. Rossello & W. Hinzen. 2017. What narratives tell us about language in high-functioning autism. Presentation at GALA 13, Palma de Mallorca, Sept 9, 2017.Google Scholar

  • Shield, A., R. P Meier & H. Tager-Flusberg. 2015. The use of sign language pronouns by native-signing children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 45. 2128–2145.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shukla, M. 2016. Do certain concepts need syntax for their development? A conversation about 2-place predicates. Talk at Workshop, Perception and Acquisition of Language, SISSA, Trieste, April 2016.Google Scholar

  • Southgate, V., A. Senju & G. Csibra 2007. Action anticipation through attribution of false belief by 2-year-olds. Psychologist Sciences 18. 587–592. PMID: 17614866.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tager-Flusberg, H., S. Calkins, T. Nolin, T. Baumberger, M. Anderson & A. Chadwick-Dias. 1990. A longitudinal study of language acquisition in autistic and Down syndrome children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 20. 1–21.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tek, S., L. Mesite, D. Fein & L. Naigles. 2014. Longitudinal analyses of expressive language development reveal two distinct language profiles among young children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 44. 75–89.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tempelmann, S., J. Kaminski1 & K. Liebal (2013). When apes point the finger: Three great ape species fail to use a conspecific’s imperative pointing gesture. Interaction Studies 14(1). 7–23.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Waterhouse, L. & D. Fein. 1982. Language skills in developmentally disabled children. Brain and Language 15. 307–333.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2017-09-29

Published in Print: 2017-09-26


Research leading to this paper has been supported by the grants ‘Language and Mental Health’, AH/L004070/1, and ‘Un-Cartesian linguistics’, AH/H50009X/1 awarded by the Arts and Humanities Research Council, UK, and the grants ‘Language, Deixis, and the Disordered Mind’ (FFI2013-40526-P) and ‘Cognitive and linguistic diversity across mental disorders’ (FFI 042177665-77665-4-16) awarded by the Ministerio de economia y competitividad, Madrid.


Citation Information: Theoretical Linguistics, Volume 43, Issue 3-4, Pages 297–317, ISSN (Online) 1613-4060, ISSN (Print) 0301-4428, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2017-0020.

Export Citation

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston. Copyright Clearance Center

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in