Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Theoretical Linguistics

An Open Peer Review Journal

Editor-in-Chief: Krifka, Manfred

Ed. by Gärtner, Hans-Martin

4 Issues per year

IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 2.000
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 2.343

CiteScore 2017: 0.70

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.457
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 1.318

See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 44, Issue 1-2


Animacy shifts and resolution of semantic conflicts: A typological commentary on Shifting animacy by de Swart & de Hoop

Andrej Malchukov
  • Corresponding author
  • Language Typology, Department of English and Linguistics, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Jakob-Welder-Weg 18, D 55128 Mainz, Germany
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2018-05-23 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2018-0004


  • Aristar, Anthony R. 1997. Marking and hierarchy: Types and the grammaticalization of case-markers. Studies in Language 21. 313–368.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, Ina, Andrej Malchukov & Marc Richards. 2015. Scales and hierarchies: A cross-disciplinary perspective. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Breu, Walter. 1994. Interactions between lexical, temporal and aspectual meanings. Studies in Language 18. 23–44.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • De Wit, Astrid. 2017. The present perfective paradox across languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Francis, Elaine & Laura Michaelis (eds.). 2003. Mismatch: Form-function incongruity and the architecture of grammar. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar

  • Haspelmath, Martin. 2007. Pre-established categories don’t exist: Consequences for language description and typology. Linguistic Typology 11(1). 119–132.Google Scholar

  • Haspelmath, Martin. 2010. Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in crosslinguistic studies. Language 86. 663–687.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Haspelmath, Martin. 2011. On S, A, P, T, and R as comparative concepts for alignment typology. Linguistic Typology 15(3). 535–567.Google Scholar

  • Haspelmath, Martin. 2015. Descriptive scales versus comparative scales. In I. Bornkessel-Schlesewsky et al. (eds.), Scales and hierarchies: A cross-disciplinary perspective, 45–58. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • de Hoop, Helen & Andrej Malchukov. 2007. On fluid differential case marking: A bidirectional OT approach. Lingua 117. 1636–1656.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • de Hoop, Helen & Andrej Malchukov. 2008. Case-marking strategies. Linguistic Inquiry 39. 565–587.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Keenan, Edward & Bernard Comrie. 1977. Noun Phrase Accessibility and Universal Grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 8. 63–99.Google Scholar

  • MacWhinney, Brian. 2014. Conclusions: Competition across time. In B. MacWhinney et al. (eds.), Competing motivations in grammar and usage, 364–387. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • MacWhinney, Brian, Andrej Malchukov & Edith Moravcsik (eds). 2014. Competing motivations in grammar and cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Malchukov, Andrej. 2008. Animacy and asymmetries in differential case marking. Lingua 118. 203–221.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Malchukov, Andrej. 2009. Incompatible categories: Resolving the “present perfective paradox”. In L. Hogeweg et al. (eds.), Cross-linguistic semantics of tense, aspect and modality, 13–33. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Malchukov, Andrej. 2011. Interaction of verbal categories: Resolution of infelicitous grammeme combinations. Linguistics 49. 229–282.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Malchukov, Andrej. 2017. Ergativity and Differential Case Marking. In J. Coon et al. (eds.), The Oxford handbook of ergativity, 253–279. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Malchukov, Andrej & de Swart. Peter 2008. Differential case marking and actancy variation. In A. Malchukov & A. Spencer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of case, 339–356. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Michaelis, Laura. 2004. Type shifting in construction grammar: An integrated approach to aspectual coercion. Cognitive Linguistics 15. 1–67.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Moravcsik, Edith. 2014. Introduction. In B. MacWhinney et al. (eds.), Competing motivations in grammar and usage, 1–17. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Newmeyer, Frederick J. 2007. Linguistic typology requires crosslinguistic formal categories. Linguistic Typology 11. 133–157.Google Scholar

  • Plank, Frans. 2015. Time for change. Dahlem Lectures in Linguistics, Freie Universität Berlin. 10 February 2015. https://hpsg.hu-berlin.de/~stefan/Bilder/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Time-for-change.Berlin-handout.large_.pdf (accessed 22 February 2018)

  • Pustejovsky, James. 1995. The generative lexicon. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Scott, Graham K. 1978. The Fore language of Papua New Guinea. Canberra: Research School of Pacific Studies, The Australian National University.Google Scholar

  • de Swart, Henriëtte. 1998. Aspect shift and coercion. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 16. 347–385.Google Scholar

  • de Swart, Henriëtte. 2011. Mismatches and coercion In C. Maienborn et al. (eds.), Semantics (Volume 1), 574–597. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • de Swart, Peter. 2007. Cross-linguistic variation in object marking. Nijmegen: Radboud University dissertation.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2018-05-23

Published in Print: 2018-05-25

Citation Information: Theoretical Linguistics, Volume 44, Issue 1-2, Pages 47–55, ISSN (Online) 1613-4060, ISSN (Print) 0301-4428, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2018-0004.

Export Citation

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in