Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Theoretical Linguistics

An Open Peer Review Journal

Editor-in-Chief: Krifka, Manfred

Ed. by Gärtner, Hans-Martin

4 Issues per year

IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 2.000
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 2.343

CiteScore 2017: 0.70

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.457
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 1.318

See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 44, Issue 1-2


Shifting perspective: noun classes, voice, and animacy type shifts

Diane Nelson
  • Corresponding author
  • Linguistics & Phonetics, School of Languages, Cultures and Societies, University of Leeds, LS2 9JT, Great Britain
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Virve-Anneli Vihman
Published Online: 2018-05-23 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2018-0005


  • Aristar, Anthony R. 1997. Marking and hierarchy types and the grammaticalization of case-markers. Studies in Language 21(2), 313–368.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bassène, Alain Christian. 2012. Concurrence entre critères morphologiques et critères sémantiques dans les accords de classe: Le cas du jóola banjal. Africana Linguistica 18. 261–277. doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Blevins, James P. 2003. Passives and impersonals. Journal of Linguistics 39. 473–520.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bond, Oliver, Greville C. Corbett, Marina Chumakina & Dunstan Brown (eds.). 2016. Archi : Complexities of agreement in cross-theoretical perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Chumakina, Marina & Greville C. Corbett. 2015. Gender-number marking in Archi: Small is complex. In M. Baerman et al. (eds.), Understanding and Measuring Morphological Complexity, 93–116. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Creissels, Denis. 2017. Humanness, animacy, and sex in the Niger-Congo “noun class” systems. Paper presented at International conference Egocentrism and Anthropocentrism in Language and Discourse, Lyon, 30–31 March.Google Scholar

  • Croft, William. 1994. Semantic universals in classifier systems. WORD 45. 145–171.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dixon, R. M. W. 1972. The Dyirbal language of North Queensland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Fife, James. 1985. The impersonal verbs in Welsh. Bulletin of the Board of Celtic Studies 32. 92–126.Google Scholar

  • Frajzyngier, Zygmunt. 1982. Indefinite agent, passive and impersonal passive: A functional study. Lingua 58. 267–290.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Givón, Thomas. 2011. Ute reference grammar (Culture and Language Use 3). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Hakulinen, Auli & Fred Karlsson. 1988. Nykysuomen lauseoppia [Modern Finnish Grammar]. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.Google Scholar

  • Hakulinen, Auli, Maria Vilkuna, Riitta Korhonen, Vesa Koivisto, Tarja-Riitta Heinonen & Irja Alho. 2004. Iso suomen kielioppi. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.Google Scholar

  • Kaiser, Elsi & Virve-Anneli Vihman. 2007. Invisible arguments: Effects of demotion in Estonian and Finnish. In B. Lyngfelt & T. Solstad (eds.), Demoting the agent: Passive, middle and other voice phenomena, 111–141. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Kibort, Anna. 2008. Impersonals in Polish: An LFG perspective. Transactions of the Philological Society 106. 246–289.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Kiparsky, Paul. 1998. Partitive Case and Aspect. In M. Butt & W. Geuder (eds.), The Projection of Arguments: Lexical and compositional factors. Stanford: CSLI publications.Google Scholar

  • Lockwood, Hunter T. & Monica Macaulay. 2012. Prominence Hierarchies. Language and Linguistics Compass 6. 431–446.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Manninen, Satu & Diane Nelson. 2004. What is a passive? The case of Finnish. Studia Linguistica 58. 212–251.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Noonan, Michael. 1994. A tale of two passives in Irish. In B. T. Fox & P. J. Hopper (eds.), Voice: Form and function, 279–311. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Perlmutter, David M. 1978. Impersonal Passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 38. 157–189.Google Scholar

  • Sagna, Serge. 2008. Formal and semantic properties of the Gújjolaay Eegimaa (a.k.a Banjal) nominal classification system. London: University of London, School of Oriental and African Studies dissertation.Google Scholar

  • Sagna, Serge. 2012. Physical properties and culture-specific factors as principles of semantic categorisation of the Gújjolaay Eegimaa noun class system. Cognitive Linguistics 23. 129–163.Google Scholar

  • Shore, Susanna. 1988. On the so-called Finnish passive. WORD 39. 151–176.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Siewierska, Anna. 1984. The Passive: A Comparative Linguistic Analysis. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar

  • Tendeng, Odile. 2000.Le Gusiilay: Un essai de systématisation. Une contribution à l’étude du Jóola. Freiburg: Albert-Ludwigs-Universität zu Freiburg.Google Scholar

  • Torn, Reeli. 2002. The status of the passive in English and Estonian. Working Papers in English and Applied Linguistics 7. 81–106.Google Scholar

  • Torn-Leesik, Reeli & Virve-Anneli Vihman. 2010. The uses of impersonals in spoken Estonian. SKY Journal of Linguistics 23. 301–343.Google Scholar

  • Vihman, Virve-Anneli. 2004. Valency reduction in Estonian. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh dissertation.Google Scholar

  • Vilkuna, Maria. 1996. Suomen lauseopin perusteet [Foundations of Finnish syntax]. Helsinki: Edita.Google Scholar

  • Yamamoto, Mutsumi. 1999. Animacy and reference: A cognitive approach to corpus linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Yamamoto, Mutsumi. 2006. Agency and impersonality: Their linguistic and cultural manifestations. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2018-05-23

Published in Print: 2018-05-25

Citation Information: Theoretical Linguistics, Volume 44, Issue 1-2, Pages 57–69, ISSN (Online) 1613-4060, ISSN (Print) 0301-4428, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2018-0005.

Export Citation

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in