Bliss, Heather. 2010. Argument structure, applicatives and animacy in Blackfoot. In H. Bliss & R. Girard (eds.), Proceedings of the 13th and 14th Workshop on the Structure and Constituency of Languages of the Americas (UBC Working Papers in Linguistics, Vol. 26). Vancouver: UBC Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Bliss, Heather. 2013. The Blackfoot configurationality conspiracy: Parallels and differences in clausal and nominal structures. Vancouver: UBC dissertation.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1946. Algonquian. In H. Hoijer (ed.), Linguistic structures of native America, 85–129. New York: Viking Fund Publications in Anthropology 6.Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville. 1991. Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dahlstrom, Amy. 1995. Motivation vs. predictability in Algonquian gender. In D. H. Pentland (ed.), Papers of the Twenty-Sixth Algonquian Conference, 52–66. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba.Google Scholar
Frantz, Donald G. & Norma Jean Russell. 2017. Blackfoot grammar, 3rd edn. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Goddard, Ives. 2002. Grammatical gender in Algonquian. In H.C. Wolfard (ed.), Papers of the 33rd Algonquian Conference, 195–231. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba.Google Scholar
Hockett, Charles F. 1958. A course in modern linguistics. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Johansson, Sara. 2008. The status of nominal gender in Algonquian: Evidence from psych verbs. In S. Jones (ed.), Proceedings of the 2008 Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association. http://homes.chass.utoronto.ca/~cla-acl/actes2008/CLA2008_Johansson.pdf (accessed 26 February 2018).
Kim, Kyumin. 2015. Spatial PPs and the structure of motion verbs in Blackfoot. In N. Weber & S. Chen (eds.), Proceedings of the 19th Workshop on the Structure and Constituency of Languages of the Americas, 35–49 (UBC Working Papers in Linguistics, Vol. 39). Vancouver: UBC Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Louie, Megan. 2008. Atemporal anchoring of individuals, events and subevents in Blackfoot: Consequences for the syntax-semantics interface. Toronto: University of Toronto MA thesis.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 2001. The Languages of Native North America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ritter, Elizabeth. 2014. Featuring animacy. Nordlyd 41. 103–124.Google Scholar
Ritter, Elizabeth. 2015. Selection for [m] in Blackfoot: Consequences for event structure. Workshop on contrast in syntax, Department of Linguistics, University of Toronto, April 24–25, 2015.Google Scholar
Ritter, Elizabeth & Martina Wiltschko. 2016. Humanness as an alternative to case licensing. In L. Hracs (ed.), Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association. http://cla-acl.ca/wp-content/uploads/actes-2016/Ritter_Wiltschko_CLA2016_proceedings.pdf (accessed 26 February 2018).
Wiltschko, Martina. 2012. Decomposing the count-mass distinction: Evidence from languages that lack it. In D. Massam (ed.), Count and mass across languages, 146–171. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar