Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Theoretical Linguistics

An Open Peer Review Journal

Editor-in-Chief: Krifka, Manfred

Ed. by Gärtner, Hans-Martin

4 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 2.000
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 2.343

CiteScore 2017: 0.70

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.457
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 1.318

Online
ISSN
1613-4060
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 44, Issue 1-2

Issues

On type composition and agentivity

Petra B. Schumacher
  • Corresponding author
  • Institute for German Language and Literature, University of Cologne, Albertus Magnus Platz, Cologne D-50923, Germany
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2018-05-23 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2018-0007

References

  • Asher, Nicholas. 2011. Lexical meaning in context: A web of words. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Bierwisch, Manfred. 1988. On the grammar of local prepositions. In M. Bierwisch et al. (eds.), Syntax, Semantik und Lexikon, 1–65. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar

  • Comrie, Bernard. 1989. Language universals and linguistic typology: Syntax and morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Dowty, David R. 1991. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67. 547–619.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Frisson, Steven. 2009. Semantic underspecification in language processing. Language and Linguistics Compass 3(1). 111–127.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Leach, Edmund R. 1964. Anthropological aspects of language: Animal categories and verbal insults. In E. H. Lenneberg (ed.), New direction in the study of language, 23–63. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Leslie, Alan M. 1995. A theory of agency. In D. Sperber et al. (eds.), Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary debate, 121–141, Oxford. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

  • Lowder, Matthew W. & Peter C. Gordon. 2015. Natural forces as agents: Reconceptualizing the animate–Inanimate distinction. Cognition 136. 85–90.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Nunberg, Geoffrey. 1979. The non-uniqueness of semantic solutions: Polysemy. Linguistics and Philosophy 3. 143–184.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Partee, Barbara H. 1987. Noun phrase interpretation and type shifting principles. In J. Groenendijk et al. (eds.), Studies in Discourse Representation Theory and the theory of generalized quantifiers, 115–143. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar

  • Primus, Beatrice. 2012. Animacy, generalized semantic roles and differential object marking. In M. Lamers & P. de Swart (eds.), Case, word order, and prominence: Interacting cues in language production and comprehension, 65–90. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

  • Pustejovsky, James. 1995. The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Schumacher, Petra B. 2011. The hepatitis called …: Electrophysiological evidence for enriched composition. In J. Meibauer & M. Steinbach (eds.), Experimental Pragmatics/Semantics, 199–219. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Schumacher, Petra B. 2013. When combinatorial processing results in reconceptualization: Toward a new approach of compositionality. Frontiers in Psychology 4. 677. doi: CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Schumacher, Petra B. 2014. Content and context in incremental processing: “the ham sandwich” revisited. Philosophical Studies 168. 151–165.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Silverstein, Michael. 1976. Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In R.M.W. Dixon (ed.), Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages, 112–171. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar

  • de Swart, Henriëtte, Yoad Winter & Joost Zwarts. 2007. Bare nominals and reference to capacities. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25. 195–222.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Weckerly, Jill & Marta Kutas. 1999. An electrophysiological analysis of animacy effects in the processing of object relative sentences. Psychophysiology 36. 559–570.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Weiland-Breckle, Hanna & Petra B. Schumacher. 2017. Artist-for-work metonymy: Type clash or underspecification? Mental Lexicon 12. 219–233.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Yamamoto, Mutsumi. 1999. Animacy and reference: A cognitive approach to corpus linguistics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Zhang, Yaxu, Jinlu Zhang & Baoquan Min. 2012. Neural dynamics of animacy processing in language comprehension: ERP evidence from the interpretation of classifier–noun combinations. Brain and Language 120. 321–331.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2018-05-23

Published in Print: 2018-05-25


Citation Information: Theoretical Linguistics, Volume 44, Issue 1-2, Pages 81–91, ISSN (Online) 1613-4060, ISSN (Print) 0301-4428, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2018-0007.

Export Citation

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in