Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Theoretical Linguistics

An Open Peer Review Journal

Editor-in-Chief: Krifka, Manfred

Ed. by Gärtner, Hans-Martin

4 Issues per year

IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 2.000
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 2.343

CiteScore 2017: 0.70

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.457
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 1.318

See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 44, Issue 1-2


Animacy shift and layers of nominal structure

Elisabeth Verhoeven
  • Corresponding author
  • Institut für deutsche Sprache und Linguistik, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Sprach- und literaturwissenschaftliche Fakultät, Unter den Linden 6, D -10099 Berlin, Germany
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2018-05-23 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2018-0009


  • Adger, David. 2003. Core syntax: A minimalist approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Adger, David & Peter Svenonius. 2011. Features in minimalist syntax. In C. Boeckx (ed.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic minimalism, 27–51. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 1994. Classifiers in Tariana. Anthropological Linguistics 36.407–465.Google Scholar

  • Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2000. Classifiers: A typology of noun categorization devices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Baker, Mark. 1988. Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Barcan Elwist, Sharon 2015, The Latin American story finder: A guide to 470 tales from Mexico, Central America, and South America, listing subjects and sources. Jefferson/NC: MacFarland.Google Scholar

  • Bošković, Željko. 2007. Agree, Phases, and Intervention Effects. Linguistic Analysis 33. 54–96.Google Scholar

  • Chierchia, Gennaro. 1998. Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics 6. 339–405.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Corbett, Greville G. 2007. Gender and Noun Classes. In T. Shopen (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description III: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, 241–279. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Dowty, David R. 1991. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67. 547–619.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • de Hoop, Helen. 2012. Type shifting. In C. Maienborn et al. (eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning. 3. 2259–2271. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Malchukov, Andrej L. 2008. Animacy and asymmetries in differential case marking. Lingua 118. 203–221.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Partee, Barbara H. 1987. Noun phrase interpretation and type shifting principles. In J. Groenendijk et al. (eds.), Studies in Discourse Representation Theory and the theory of generalized quantifiers, 115–143. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar

  • Primus, Beatrice 2012. Animacy, generalized semantic roles, and differential object marking. In M. Lamers & P. de Swart (eds.), Case, Word Order, and Prominence. Interacting Cues in Language Production and Comprehension, 65–90. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

  • de Swart, Henriette, Yoad Winter & Joost Zwarts. 2007. Bare nominals and reference to capacities. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25. 195–222.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • de Swart, Peter. 2014. Prepositional inanimates in Dutch: A paradigmatic case of differential object marking. Linguistics 52. 445–468.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Wiltschko, Martina & Elizabeth Ritter. 2015. Animating the narrow syntax. The Linguistic Review 32. 869–908.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2018-05-23

Published in Print: 2018-05-25

Citation Information: Theoretical Linguistics, Volume 44, Issue 1-2, Pages 99–106, ISSN (Online) 1613-4060, ISSN (Print) 0301-4428, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2018-0009.

Export Citation

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in