Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Theoretical Linguistics

An Open Peer Review Journal

Editor-in-Chief: Krifka, Manfred

Ed. by Gärtner, Hans-Martin

4 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 2.000
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 2.343

CiteScore 2017: 0.70

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.457
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 1.318

Online
ISSN
1613-4060
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 44, Issue 1-2

Issues

Typical and atypical type-shifts in animacy

Helen de Hoop
  • Corresponding author
  • Centre for Language Studies, Radboud University, P.O. Box 9103, 6500 HD Nijmegen, The Netherlands
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Peter de Swart
Published Online: 2018-05-23 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2018-0011

References

  • Collin, Sebastian, Helen de Hoop, Peter de Swart, Ruti Vardi & Jorrit Vogels. in prep. Eye-movement: Effects of animacy features on language use. Radboud University Nijmegen.Google Scholar

  • Demuth, Katherine, Malillo Machobane, Francina Moloi & Christopher Odata. 2005. Learning animacy hierarchy effects in Sesotho double object applicatives. Language 81. 421–447.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dowty, David. 1991. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67. 547–619.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fukumura, Kumiko & Roger P. G. van Gompel. 2011. The effect of animacy on the choice of referring expression. Language and Cognitive Processes 26. 1472–1504.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • de Hoop, Helen & Bhuvana Narasimhan. 2005. Differential case-marking in Hindi. In M. Amberber & H. de Hoop (eds.), Competition and variation in natural languages: The case for case, 321–346. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar

  • Klein, Udo & Peter de Swart. 2011. Case and referential properties. Lingua 121. 3–19.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Lee, Hanjung. 2011. Gradients in Korean case ellipsis: An experimental investigation Lingua 121. 20–34.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Lestrade, Sander. 2010. The space of case. PhD Thesis, Radboud University Nijmegen.Google Scholar

  • Lestrade, Sander & Helen de Hoop. 2016. On case and tense. The role of grounding in differential subject marking. The Linguistic Review 33. 397–410.Google Scholar

  • Looser, Christine E. & Thalia Wheatly. 2010. The tipping point of animacy: How, when, and where we perceive life in a face. Psychological Science 21. 1854–1862.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Machal, Nira, Yeshayahu Shen, Karine Jospe & David Gil. 2014. Language effects on the conceptualization of hybrids. Language and Cognition 6. 217–241.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Malchukov, Andrej L. 2008. Animacy and asymmetries in differential case marking. Lingua 118. 203–221.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Malchukov, Andrej L. 2009. Incompatible categories. Resolving the “present perfective paradox”. In L. Hogeweg et al. (eds.), Cross-linguistic semantics of tense, aspect, and modality, 13–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Malchukov, Andrej L. & Helen de Hoop. 2011. Tense, aspect, and mood based differential case marking. Lingua 121. 35–47.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Malchukov, Andrej L. & Peter de Swart. 2009. Differential case marking and actancy variations. In A.L. Malchukov & A. Spencer (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Case, 339–355. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Primus, Beatrice. 2011. Animacy and telicity: Semantic constraints on impersonal passives. Lingua 121. 80–99.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Radanović, Jelena, Chris Westbury & Petar Milin. 2016. Quantifying semantic animacy: How much are words alive? Applied Psycholinguistics 37. 1477–1499.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ritter, Elizabeth. 2014. Featuring animacy. Nordlyd 41. 103–124.Google Scholar

  • de Swart, Peter. 2003. The case mirror. MA Thesis, Radboud University Nijmegen.Google Scholar

  • de Swart, Peter. 2006. Case markedness. In L. Kulikov et al. (eds.), Case, Valency and Transitivity, 249–267. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Vogels, Jorrig. 2014. Referential choices in language production: The role of accessibility. PhD Thesis, Tilburg University.Google Scholar

  • Vogels, Jorrig, Emiel Krahmer & Alfons Maes. 2013. When a stone tries to climb up a slope: The interplay between lexical and perceptual animacy in referential choices. Frontiers in Psychology 4. 1–15.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Welch, Nicholas. 2016. Propping up predicates: Adjectival predication in Tłįchǫ Yatiì. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 1(1): 2. 1–23.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2018-05-23

Published in Print: 2018-05-25


Citation Information: Theoretical Linguistics, Volume 44, Issue 1-2, Pages 113–122, ISSN (Online) 1613-4060, ISSN (Print) 0301-4428, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2018-0011.

Export Citation

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in