Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton May 23, 2018

Typical and atypical type-shifts in animacy

  • Helen de Hoop EMAIL logo and Peter de Swart
From the journal Theoretical Linguistics

References

Collin, Sebastian, Helen de Hoop, Peter de Swart, Ruti Vardi & Jorrit Vogels. in prep. Eye-movement: Effects of animacy features on language use. Radboud University Nijmegen.Search in Google Scholar

Demuth, Katherine, Malillo Machobane, Francina Moloi & Christopher Odata. 2005. Learning animacy hierarchy effects in Sesotho double object applicatives. Language 81. 421–447.10.1353/lan.2005.0056Search in Google Scholar

Dowty, David. 1991. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67. 547–619.10.1353/lan.1991.0021Search in Google Scholar

Fukumura, Kumiko & Roger P. G. van Gompel. 2011. The effect of animacy on the choice of referring expression. Language and Cognitive Processes 26. 1472–1504.10.1080/01690965.2010.506444Search in Google Scholar

de Hoop, Helen & Bhuvana Narasimhan. 2005. Differential case-marking in Hindi. In M. Amberber & H. de Hoop (eds.), Competition and variation in natural languages: The case for case, 321–346. Oxford: Elsevier.10.1016/B978-008044651-6/50015-XSearch in Google Scholar

Klein, Udo & Peter de Swart. 2011. Case and referential properties. Lingua 121. 3–19.10.1016/j.lingua.2010.07.005Search in Google Scholar

Lee, Hanjung. 2011. Gradients in Korean case ellipsis: An experimental investigation Lingua 121. 20–34.10.1016/j.lingua.2010.07.002Search in Google Scholar

Lestrade, Sander. 2010. The space of case. PhD Thesis, Radboud University Nijmegen.Search in Google Scholar

Lestrade, Sander & Helen de Hoop. 2016. On case and tense. The role of grounding in differential subject marking. The Linguistic Review 33. 397–410.10.1515/tlr-2016-0003Search in Google Scholar

Looser, Christine E. & Thalia Wheatly. 2010. The tipping point of animacy: How, when, and where we perceive life in a face. Psychological Science 21. 1854–1862.10.1177/0956797610388044Search in Google Scholar

Machal, Nira, Yeshayahu Shen, Karine Jospe & David Gil. 2014. Language effects on the conceptualization of hybrids. Language and Cognition 6. 217–241.10.1017/langcog.2014.6Search in Google Scholar

Malchukov, Andrej L. 2008. Animacy and asymmetries in differential case marking. Lingua 118. 203–221.10.1016/j.lingua.2007.02.005Search in Google Scholar

Malchukov, Andrej L. 2009. Incompatible categories. Resolving the “present perfective paradox”. In L. Hogeweg et al. (eds.), Cross-linguistic semantics of tense, aspect, and modality, 13–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.148.02malSearch in Google Scholar

Malchukov, Andrej L. & Helen de Hoop. 2011. Tense, aspect, and mood based differential case marking. Lingua 121. 35–47.10.1016/j.lingua.2010.07.003Search in Google Scholar

Malchukov, Andrej L. & Peter de Swart. 2009. Differential case marking and actancy variations. In A.L. Malchukov & A. Spencer (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Case, 339–355. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199206476.013.0023Search in Google Scholar

Primus, Beatrice. 2011. Animacy and telicity: Semantic constraints on impersonal passives. Lingua 121. 80–99.10.1016/j.lingua.2010.07.009Search in Google Scholar

Radanović, Jelena, Chris Westbury & Petar Milin. 2016. Quantifying semantic animacy: How much are words alive? Applied Psycholinguistics 37. 1477–1499.10.1017/S0142716416000096Search in Google Scholar

Ritter, Elizabeth. 2014. Featuring animacy. Nordlyd 41. 103–124.10.7557/12.3315Search in Google Scholar

de Swart, Peter. 2003. The case mirror. MA Thesis, Radboud University Nijmegen.Search in Google Scholar

de Swart, Peter. 2006. Case markedness. In L. Kulikov et al. (eds.), Case, Valency and Transitivity, 249–267. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.77.16swaSearch in Google Scholar

Vogels, Jorrig. 2014. Referential choices in language production: The role of accessibility. PhD Thesis, Tilburg University.Search in Google Scholar

Vogels, Jorrig, Emiel Krahmer & Alfons Maes. 2013. When a stone tries to climb up a slope: The interplay between lexical and perceptual animacy in referential choices. Frontiers in Psychology 4. 1–15.10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00154Search in Google Scholar

Welch, Nicholas. 2016. Propping up predicates: Adjectival predication in Tłįchǫ Yatiì. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 1(1): 2. 1–23.10.5334/gjgl.7Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2018-05-23
Published in Print: 2018-05-25

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 29.3.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/tl-2018-0011/html
Scroll to top button