Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Theoretical Linguistics

An Open Peer Review Journal

Editor-in-Chief: Krifka, Manfred

Ed. by Gärtner, Hans-Martin

IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 4.500

CiteScore 2018: 0.46

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.233
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.337

See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 45, Issue 3-4


Overgeneralization and change: The role of acquisition in diachrony

Marit Westergaard
  • Corresponding author
  • Department of Language and Culture, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø N-9037, Norway
  • Department of Language and Literature, NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2019-11-30 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2019-0014


  • Busterud, G., T. Lohndal, Y. Rodina & M. Westergaard. 2019. The loss of feminine gender in Norwegian: A dialect comparison. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 22. 141–167.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Cournane, A. 2015. Modal development: input-divergent L1 acquisition in the direction of diachronic reanalysis. University of Toronto (Canada) PhD Thesis.Google Scholar

  • Cournane, A. & A. T. Pérez-Leroux. Under revision. Leaving obligations behind: epistemic incrementation in preschool English.Google Scholar

  • Gelderen, Elly van. 2004. Grammaticalization as economy. John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Hall, E. & R. Maddeaux. 2018. /u/-fronting and /æ/-raising in Toronto Families. Talk Presented at New Ways of Analyzing Variation (NWAV) 47. Amsterdam: New York University.Google Scholar

  • Hinterhölzl, R. & A. van Kemenade. 2012. The interaction between syntax, information structure and prosody in word order change. In T. Nevalainen & E. C. Traugott (eds.), The Oxford handbook of the history of English. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar

  • Hudson Kam, C. L. & E. L. Newport. 2005. Regularizing unpredictable variation: The roles of adult and child learners in language formation and change. Language Learning and Development 1(2). 151–195.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kemenade, A. van & M. Westergaard. 2012. Syntax and information structure: Verb-second variation in Middle English. In A. M. Solin, et al. (eds.), Information structure and syntactic change in the history of English, 87–118. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar

  • Pinker, S. 1999. Words and rules: The ingredients of language. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar

  • Plunkett, K. & S. Strömquist. 1992. The acquisition of Scandinavian languages. In D. I Slobin (ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, 457–556. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

  • Radford, Andrew. 1992. The acquisition of the morphosyntax of finite verbs in English. In J. M. Meisel (ed.), The acquisition of verb placement: Functional categories and V2 phenomena in language acquisition, 23–62. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

  • Rodina, Y. & M. Westergaard. 2013. The acquisition of gender and declension in a non-transparent system: Monolinguals and bilinguals. Studia Linguistica 67(1). 47–67.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Rodina, Y. & M. Westergaard. 2015. Grammatical gender in Norwegian: Language acquisition and language change. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 27(2). 145–187.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rodina, Y. & M. Westergaard. Forthcoming. Grammatical gender and declension class in language change: A study of the loss of feminine gender in Norwegian. Journal of Germanic Linguistics.Google Scholar

  • Roeper, T. 1999. Universal bilingualism. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 2(3). 169–186.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schönenberger, M. 2001. Embedded V-to-C in child grammar: The acquisition of verb placement in Swiss German. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar

  • Snyder, W. 2007. Child language: The parametric approach. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar

  • Sollid, H. 2005. Språkdannelse og -stabilisering i møtet mellom kvensk og norsk. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar

  • Valian, V. 1990. Null subjects: A problem for parameter-setting models of language acquisition. Cognition 35(2). 105–122.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Valian, V. 1991. Syntactic subjects in the early speech of American and Italian children. Cognition 40. 21–81.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Waldmann, C. 2011. Moving in small steps towards verb second: A case study. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 34(3). 331–359.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Westergaard, M. 2009a. Usage-based vs. rule-based learning: The acquisition of word order in Wh-questions in English and Norwegian. Journal of Child Language 36(5). 1023–1051.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Westergaard, M. 2009b. The acquisition of word order: Micro-cues, information structure and economy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Westergaard, M. 2009c. The development of word order in old and Middle English: The role of information structure and first language acquisition. Diachronica 26(1). 65–102.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Westergaard, M. 2009d. Microvariation as diachrony: A view from acquisition. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 12(1). 49–79.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Westergaard, M. 2014. Linguistic variation and micro-cues in first language acquisition. Linguistic Variation 14(1). 26–45.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2019-11-30

Published in Print: 2019-12-18

Citation Information: Theoretical Linguistics, Volume 45, Issue 3-4, Pages 225–231, ISSN (Online) 1613-4060, ISSN (Print) 0301-4428, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2019-0014.

Export Citation

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in