Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

The Linguistic Review

Editor-in-Chief: Hulst, Harry

4 Issues per year

IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.676
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.831

CiteScore 2016: 0.52

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.662
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.573

See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 21, Issue 3-4 (Sep 2004)


Discussion paper on Gilbert Lazard's “On the status of linguistics with particular regard to typology”

Paolo Ramat
Published Online: 2005-07-27 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.2004.21.3-4.413


This paper deals with the concept of internal versus external explanation in linguistics and the difficulty of drawing a clear-cut dividing line. Crosslinguistic comparison helps us to understand what may be considered as strictly pertaining to the linguistic dimension or to a larger cognitive frame. Linguistic categories are then discussed in this frame of reference and a scheme is proposed where the notion of “category” does not apply to concepts such as “passive”, “perfect”, or “subject”. Finally it is maintained that the classical “parts-of-speech” theory is still a valuable tool for crosslinguistic comparison in a typological perspective.

About the article

Published Online: 2005-07-27

Published in Print: 2004-09-13

Citation Information: The Linguistic Review, ISSN (Online) 1613-3676, ISSN (Print) 0167-6318, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.2004.21.3-4.413.

Export Citation

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in