Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

The Linguistic Review

Editor-in-Chief: Hulst, Harry

4 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.676
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.831

CiteScore 2016: 0.52

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.662
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.573

Online
ISSN
1613-3676
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 22, Issue 2-4 (Dec 2005)

Issues

Psycholinguistics, formal grammars, and cognitive science

Fernanda Ferreira
Published Online: 2005-12-06 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.2005.22.2-4.365

Abstract

In the 1980s, Charles Clifton referred to a “psycholinguistic renaissance” in cognitive science. During that time, there was almost unanimous agreement that any self-respecting psycholinguist would make sure to keep abreast of major developments in generative grammar, because a competence model was essential, and the linguistic theory was the proper description of that competence. But today, many psycholinguists are disenchanted with generative grammar. One reason is that the Minimalist Program is difficult to adapt to processing models. Another is that generative theories appear to rest on a weak empirical foundation, due to the reliance on informally gathered grammaticality judgments. What can be done to remedy the situation? First, formal linguists might follow Ray Jackendoff’s recent suggestion that they connect their work more closely to research in the rest of cognitive science. Second, syntactic theory should develop a better methodology for collecting data about whether a sentence is good or bad. A set of standards for creating examples, testing them on individuals, analyzing the results, and reporting findings in published work should be established. If these two ideas were considered, linguistic developments might once again be relevant to the psycholinguistic enterprise.

About the article

Published Online: 2005-12-06

Published in Print: 2005-12-12


Citation Information: The Linguistic Review, ISSN (Online) 1613-3676, ISSN (Print) 0167-6318, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.2005.22.2-4.365.

Export Citation

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Ray Jackendoff
Perception, 2012, Volume 41, Number 9, Page 1128
[2]
Jonathan Ginzburg and Massimo Poesio
Frontiers in Psychology, 2016, Volume 7
[3]
J. Carlos Acuña-Fariña
Language Sciences, 2016, Volume 57, Page 34
[4]
Ray Jackendoff
Cognitive Science, 2017, Volume 41, Page 185
[7]
Jeffrey Maynes and Steven Gross
Philosophy Compass, 2013, Volume 8, Number 8, Page 714
[8]
Edward P. Stabler
Topics in Cognitive Science, 2013, Volume 5, Number 3, Page 611
[9]
Mirko Grimaldi
Journal of Neurolinguistics, 2012, Volume 25, Number 5, Page 304
[10]
Edward Gibson and Evelina Fedorenko
Language and Cognitive Processes, 2013, Volume 28, Number 1-2, Page 88
[11]
Frederick J. Newmeyer
Theoretical Linguistics, 2011, Volume 37, Number 1-2
[12]
Edward Gibson, Steve Piantadosi, and Kristina Fedorenko
Language and Linguistics Compass, 2011, Volume 5, Number 8, Page 509
[13]
Pamela A. Smith
Aphasiology, 2010, Volume 24, Number 11, Page 1342
[14]
Peter W. Culicover and Ray Jackendoff
Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2010, Volume 14, Number 6, Page 234
[15]
Ray Jackendoff
The Linguistic Review, 2007, Volume 24, Number 4
[17]
Napoleon Katsos and Chris Cummins
Language and Linguistics Compass, 2010, Volume 4, Number 5, Page 282
[18]
J. Culbertson and S. Gross
The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 2009, Volume 60, Number 4, Page 721

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in