Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details

The Linguistic Review

Editor-in-Chief: Hulst, Harry

IMPACT FACTOR increased in 2015: 0.500
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.590

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.662
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.573
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2015: 0.407

See all formats and pricing


Select Volume and Issue


30,00 € / $42.00 / £23.00

Get Access to Full Text

Exemplar models, evolution and language change

Andrew B Wedel1


Citation Information: The Linguistic Review. Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages 247–274, ISSN (Online) 1613-3676, ISSN (Print) 0167-6318, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/TLR.2006.010, November 2006

Publication History

Published Online:


Evidence supporting a rich memory for associations suggests that people can store perceptual details in the form of exemplars. The resulting particulate model of category contents allows the application of evolution theory in modeling category change, because variation in categorized percepts is reflected in the distribution of exemplars in a category. Within a production-perception feedback loop, variation within an exemplar-based category provides a reserve of variants that can serve as the seeds for shifts in the system over time through random or selection-driven asymmetries in production and perception. Here, three potential pathways for evolutionary change are identified in linguistic categories: pruning of lines of inheritance, blending inheritance and natural selection. Simulations of each of these pathways are shown within a simple exemplar-based model of category production and perception, showing how consideration of evolutionary processes may contribute to our understanding of linguistic category change over time.

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Esteban Buz and T. Florian Jaeger
Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 2015, Page 1
Monica Tamariz and Simon Kirby
Current Opinion in Psychology, 2015
P. F. Tupper
SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 2015, Volume 75, Number 4, Page 1469
Jennifer B. Hay, Janet B. Pierrehumbert, Abby J. Walker, and Patrick LaShell
Cognition, 2015, Volume 139, Page 83
Katia Chirkova and Tao Gong
Lingua, 2014, Volume 152, Page 65
Andrew D.M. Smith
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 2014, Volume 5, Number 3, Page 281
Christiane Ulbrich and Mikhail Ordin
Journal of Phonetics, 2014, Volume 45, Page 26
Charles B. Chang
Journal of Phonetics, 2013, Volume 41, Number 6, Page 520
Andrew Wedel, Abby Kaplan, and Scott Jackson
Cognition, 2013, Volume 128, Number 2, Page 179
Daniel Silverman
Language and Linguistics Compass, 2012, Volume 6, Number 6, Page 330
Erik R. Thomas
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 2011, Volume 2, Number 6, Page 701
Juliane Kappes, Annette Baumgaertner, Claudia Peschke, and Wolfram Ziegler
Brain and Language, 2009, Volume 111, Number 3, Page 140
Juliette Blevins
Linguistic Typology, 2007, Volume 11, Number 1
Clay Beckner, Richard Blythe, Joan Bybee, Morten H. Christiansen, William Croft, Nick C. Ellis, John Holland, Jinyun Ke, Diane Larsen-Freeman, and Tom Schoenemann
Language Learning, 2009, Volume 59, Page 1
Jeff Mielke
Language and Linguistics Compass, 2009, Volume 3, Number 2, Page 700
Paul Boersma and Silke Hamann
Phonology, 2008, Volume 25, Number 02, Page 217
Gunnar Ólafur Hansson
Language and Linguistics Compass, 2008, Volume 2, Number 5, Page 859
Adam Baker
Language and Linguistics Compass, 2008, Volume 0, Number 0, Page 080311075608831

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.