Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

The Linguistic Review

Editor-in-Chief: van der Hulst, Harry


IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 0.463
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.789

CiteScore 2018: 0.69

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.643
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.679

Online
ISSN
1613-3676
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 24, Issue 2-3

Issues

Pitch accent type matters for online processing of information status: Evidence from natural and synthetic speech

Aoju Chen / Els den Os / Jan Peter de Ruiter
Published Online: 2007-08-17 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/TLR.2007.012

Abstract

Adopting an eyetracking paradigm, we investigated the role of H*L, L*HL, L*H, H*LH, and deaccentuation at the intonational phrase-final position in online processing of information status in British English in natural speech. The role of H*L, L*H and deaccentuation was also examined in diphonesynthetic speech. It was found that H*L and L*HL create a strong bias towards newness, whereas L*H, like deaccentuation, creates a strong bias towards givenness. In synthetic speech, the same effect was found for H*L, L*H and deaccentuation, but it was delayed. The delay may not be caused entirely by the difference in the segmental quality between synthetic and natural speech. The pitch accent H*LH, however, appears to bias participants' interpretation to the target word, independent of its information status. This finding was explained in the light of the effect of durational information at the segmental level on word recognition.

About the article

Published Online: 2007-08-17

Published in Print: 2007-08-21


Citation Information: The Linguistic Review, Volume 24, Issue 2-3, Pages 317–344, ISSN (Online) 1613-3676, ISSN (Print) 0167-6318, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/TLR.2007.012.

Export Citation

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Michael Wagner and Duane G. Watson
Language and Cognitive Processes, 2010, Volume 25, Number 7-9, Page 905
[2]
Sasha Calhoun
Language and Cognitive Processes, 2010, Volume 25, Number 7-9, Page 1099
[3]
Xuliang He, Vincent J. van Heuven, and Carlos Gussenhoven
Second Language Research, 2012, Volume 28, Number 3, Page 283
[4]
Carlos Gussenhoven
Laboratory Phonology, 2016, Volume 7, Number 1, Page 10
[5]
Jennifer Cole
Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 2015, Volume 30, Number 1-2, Page 1
[6]
Sophie Repp and Heiner Drenhaus
Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 2015, Volume 30, Number 3, Page 324
[7]
Bettina Braun and Aoju Chen
Journal of Phonetics, 2010, Volume 38, Number 3, Page 431
[8]
Aoju Chen
Language Learning, 2009, Volume 59, Number 2, Page 367

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in