Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

The Linguistic Review

Editor-in-Chief: Hulst, Harry

4 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.676
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.831

CiteScore 2016: 0.52

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.662
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.573

Online
ISSN
1613-3676
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 33, Issue 4 (Nov 2016)

Issues

Ellipsis: licensing, structure and identity

Evelyn Gandón-Chapela
  • Corresponding author
  • English Department, University of Vigo, FFT. Campus Universitario, Vigo, Pontevedra E-36310, Spain
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Javier Pérez-Guerra
Published Online: 2016-08-02 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2016-0010

Abstract

Following an introduction to ellipsis and its consequences both for communication and for the theory of grammar, this paper addresses a number of issues which have been debated in the linguistic literature on ellipsis, namely structure, identity and licensing. This study brings to the readers’ attention the effects which such conditions have for the study of ellipsis in different languages as well as their constraints within the generative framework. As case studies on the conditions and the characterisation of the linguistic strategy under scrutiny, this paper also summarises the main approaches to ellipsis in the studies embodied in this special issue.

Keywords: ellipsis; antecedent; identity; licensing; mismatch

References

  • Abeillé, Anne, Gabriella Bîlbîie & François Mouret. 2011. A romance perspective on gapping constructions. In Hans Boas & Francisco Gonzálvez-García (eds.), Romance in construction grammar, 227–265. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Aelbrecht, Lobke. 2009. You have the right to remain silent. The syntactic licensing of ellipsis. Brussels: Catholic University of Brussels dissertation.Google Scholar

  • Aelbrecht, Lobke. 2010. The syntactic licensing of ellipsis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Bîlbîie, Gabriela. 2011. Grammaire des constructions elliptiques. Une étude comparative des phrases sans verbe en roumain et en français. Paris: Université Paris Diderot-Paris 7 dissertation.Google Scholar

  • Chung, Sandra. 2006. Sluicing and the lexicon: The point of no return. In Rebecca T. Cover & Yuni Kim (eds.), Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 31 (BLS), 73–91. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar

  • Chung, Sandra. 2013. Syntactic identity in sluicing: How much, and why. Linguistic Inquiry 44. 1–39.Google Scholar

  • Chung, Sandra, William Ladusaw & James McCloskey. 1995. Sluicing and logical form. Natural Language Semantics 3. 239–282.Google Scholar

  • Coppock, Elizabeth. 2001. Gapping: In defense of deletion. In Mary Andronis, Christopher Ball, Heidi Elston & Sylvain Neuvel (eds.), Proceedings of Chicago linguistic society 37, 133–148. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar

  • Culicover, Peter & Ray Jackendoff. 2005. Simpler syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Dalrymple, Mary. 2005. Against reconstruction in ellipsis. In Reinaldo Elugardo & Robert J. Stainton (eds.), Ellipsis and nonsentential speech, 31–55. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

  • Dalrymple, Mary, Stuart M. Shieber & Fernando C. N. Pereira. 1991. Ellipsis and higher-order unification. Linguistics and Philosophy 14. 399–452.Google Scholar

  • Fiengo, Robert & Robert May. 1994. Indices and identity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Gallego, Ángel Jesús. 2011. Sobre la elipsis. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar

  • Gengel, Kirsten. 2009. Phases and ellipsis. Linguistic Analysis 35. 21–42.Google Scholar

  • Ginzburg, Jonathan & Ivan A. Sag. 2000. Interrogative investigations. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar

  • Hardt, Daniel. 1993. Verb phrase ellipsis: Form, meaning, and processing. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania dissertation.Google Scholar

  • Hartmann, Katharina. 2000. Right node raising and gapping. Interface conditions on prosodic deletion. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Johnson, Kyle. 2001. What VP ellipsis can do, and what it can’t, but not why. In Martin Baltin & Chris Collins (eds.), The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory, 439–479. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Johnson, Kyle (ed.). 2008. Topics in ellipsis, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Johnson, Kyle. 2013. Licensing ellipsis. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 34(2). 71–98.Google Scholar

  • Kim, Jeong-Seok. 2006. Gapping: Movement or deletion? Studies in Generative Grammar 16(4). 595–614.Google Scholar

  • Kennedy, Christopher. 2002. Comparative deletion and optimality in syntax. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20(3). 553–621.Google Scholar

  • Lobeck, Anne. 1995. Ellipsis. Functional heads, licensing and identification. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Merchant, Jason. 2001. The syntax of silence: Sluicing, islands, and the theory of ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Merchant, Jason. 2004. Fragments and ellipsis. Linguistics and Philosophy 27(6). 661–738.Google Scholar

  • Merchant, Jason. 2013a. Ellipsis: A survey of analytical approaches. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Ms.Google Scholar

  • Merchant, Jason. 2013b. Voice and ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 44(1). 77–108.Google Scholar

  • Potts, Christopher. 2002. The syntax and semantics of as-parentheticals. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20(3). 623–689.Google Scholar

  • Roberts, Ian. 2010. Agreement and head movement. Clitics, incorporation, and defective goals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Sag, Ivan A. 1976. Deletion and logical form. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.Google Scholar

  • Thoms, Gary. 2010. Tolerated lexical mismatches in ellipsis. Glasgow: Strathclyde University Ms.Google Scholar

  • Thoms, Gary. 2011. ‘Verb floating’ and VP-ellipsis: Towards a movement account of ellipsis licensing. In Jeroen van Craenenbroeck (ed.), Linguistic variation yearbook 2010, 252–297. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Thoms, Gary. 2013. Lexical mismatches in ellipsis and the identity condition. In Stefan Keine & Shayne Sloggett (eds.), Proceedings of the Forty-Second Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistics Society (NELS 42). Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications. http://www.research.ed.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/lexical-mismatches-in-ellipsis-and-the-identity-condition(17c4ad10-23ac-44ac-8c4d-1c0e3a4e6fa3).htmlGoogle Scholar

  • van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen. 2010. The syntax of ellipsis: Evidence from Dutch dialects. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen & Jason Merchant. 2013. Ellipsis phenomena. In Marcel den Dikken (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of generative syntax, 701–745. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Williams, Edwin. 1977. Discourse and logical form. Linguistic Inquiry 8(1). 101–139.Google Scholar

  • Winkler, Susanne. 2005. Ellipsis and focus in generative grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Zagona, Karen. 1982. Government and proper government of verbal projections. Seattle, WA: University of Washington dissertation.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2016-08-02

Published in Print: 2016-11-01


We are grateful to the following institutions for generous financial support: the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness and the European Regional Development Fund (grant no. FFI2013-44065-P), and the Autonomous Government of Galicia (grant no. GPC2014/060).


Citation Information: The Linguistic Review, ISSN (Online) 1613-3676, ISSN (Print) 0167-6318, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2016-0010.

Export Citation

©2016 by De Gruyter Mouton. Copyright Clearance Center

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in