Abu-Abbas, Khaled H., Thaer T. Al-Kadi & Feda Y. Al-Tamimi. 2010. On three -rb- language games in Arabic. Argumentum 6. 76–90.Google Scholar

Anttila, Arto & Young-mee Cho. 1998. Variation and change in Optimality Theory. Lingua 104. 31–56.Google Scholar

Archangeli, Diana & Terence Langendoen, (eds.) 1997. Optimality theory. An overview. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Archibald, John. 1996. The Acquisition of Syllable Weight and Foot Type. Paper presented at the Fifth Conference on Laboratory Phonology, Northwestern University, July 1996.

Bosworth, Yulia. 2011. Weight and Feet in Québécois. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Texas at Austin.

Bullock, Barbara E. 1994. Does the French syllable have weight? In Michael Mazzola (ed.), Issues and theory in Romance Linguistics, 3–15. Washington, D.C: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

Bullock, Barbara E. 1998. The myth of equivalence. Where two lights do not make a long. In Josée Lema & Esthela Trevino (eds.), Theoretical analyses on Romance languages, 53–70. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Cedergren, Henrietta J. & Louise Simoneau. 1985. La chute des voyelles hautes enfrançais de Montréal: ‘As-tu entendu la belle syncope? In Monique Lemieux & Henrietta J. Cedergren (eds.), Les tendances dynamiques du français parlé à Montréal, 57–144. Montréal: Office de la langue française

Charette, Monique. 1991. Conditions on phonological government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cho, Young-Mee Yu & Tracy Holloway King. 2003. Semi-syllables and universal syllabification. In Caroline Féry & Ruben van de Vijver (eds.), The syllable in optimality theory, 183–213. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Clements, G.N. 1988. The role of the sonority cycle in core syllabification.Working Papers of the Cornell Phonetics Laboratory, 1–68.

Côté, Marie-Hélène. 2008. La syllabation et le relâchement des voyelles hautes en syllabe non-finale en français québécois. Paper presented at Journées PFC, Tulane University.

Couturier, Jean-François. 1998. Contribution of phonetic criteria in the linguistic study of the lowering of québécois French high vowels. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Montréal, Montréal.

Crosswhite, Katherine M. 2000b. The Analysis of Extreme Vowel Reduction. UCLAWorking Papers in Linguistics 4, 1–12.Google Scholar

Déchaine, Rose-Marie. 1991. Stress in Québécois: evidence from high vowels. Papers from the Regional Meetings, CLS, 27, 107–118.

Delattre, Pierre. 1966. Studies in French and comparative phonetics. The Hague: Mouton & Co.Google Scholar

Dumas, Denis. 1974. Durée vocalique et diphtongaison en français québécois. Cahier de Linguistique 4. 13–52.Google Scholar

Dumas, Denis. 1976. Québec French High Vowel Harmony: The Progression of a Phonological Rule. CLS 12. 161–168.Google Scholar

Dumas, Denis. 1978. Phonologie des réductions vocaliques en français québécois. Ph.D. dissertation, Université de Montréal.

Dumas, Denis. 1981. Structure de la diphtongaison québécoise. Revue canadienne de linguistique 26. 1–61.Google Scholar

Dumas, Denis. 1987. Nos façons de parler. Sillery: Presses de l’Université du Québec.Google Scholar

Féry, Caroline. 2003. “Final Devoicing and the stratification of the lexicon in German”. In Weijer, Jeroen van de, Vincent J. van Heuven & Harry van der Hulst (eds.), The phonological spectrum: Volume I: segmental structure, 145–169. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Fónagy, Ivan. 1979. L’accent français: accent probabilitaire. In Ivan Fónagy & Pierre Léon (eds.), L’accent en français contemporain, 123–233. Montréal: Didier.Google Scholar

Fujimura, Osamu. 1979. An analysis of English syllables as cores and affixes. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung, 32: 471–476

Fouché, Pierre. 1959. Traité de pronunciation française, 2nd ed. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar

Gendron, Jean-Denis. 1966. Tendances phonétiques du français parlé au Canada. Paris and Québec: Lincksieck and PUL.Google Scholar

Goad, Heather & Meagan Buckley. 2006. Prosodic structure in child French. Evidence for foot. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 5. 109–142.Google Scholar

Gordon, Matthew. 2002b. A phonetically-driven account of syllable weight. Language 78. 51–80.Google Scholar

Gordon, Matthew. 2004b. Syllable weight. In Bruce Hayes, Robert Kirchner & Donca Steriade (eds.), Phonetic Bases for Phonological Markedness, 277–312. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hayes, Bruce. 1989b. Compensatory lengthening in moraic phonology. Linguistic Inquiry 20. 253–306.Google Scholar

Hayes, Bruce.1995. Metrical stress theory. Principles and case studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Hyman, Larry. 1985. A theory of phonological weight. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar

Itô, Junko & Armin Mester. 1992. Weak layering and word binarity. In Takery Homma, Masao Okazaki, Toshiyuki Tabaka & Shin-ichi Tanaka (eds.), A new century of phonology and phonological theory, 26–65. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar

Kager, René. 1997. Rhythmic vowel deletion in Optimality Theory. In Iggy Roca (ed.), Derivations and constraints in phonology, 463–499. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kager, René. 1999. Optimality theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

McCarthy, John J. & Alan Prince. 1993a. Generalized Alignment. In Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology, 79–153. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Also ROA–7.Google Scholar

McCarthy, John & Alan Prince. 1993b. Prosodic Morphology I: Constraint Interaction and Satisfaction. Rutgers Technical report TR-3. New Brunswick, Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science.

McCarthy, John & Alan Prince. 1995a. Faithfulness and reduplicative identity. In Beckman, WalshDickey, and Urbanczyk, 249–384.

Montreuil, Jean-Pierre. 1992. An underspecification analysis of two French vowel systems. In Theoretical analyses in Romance linguistics (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 74), Terrel A. Morgan & Christiane Laeufer (eds.), Amsterdam: Benjamins, 115–127.Google Scholar

Montreuil, Jean-Pierre. 1993. Prosody, morphology and foot formation in Modern French. Paper presented at the Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages, Northern Illinois University.

Montreuil, Jean-Pierre. 1995a. Weight and length in Conservative Regional French. Lingua, 95, 77–96

Montreuil, Jean-Pierre. 2004a. Fragmenting weight in Scottish English. In Monica Pulki (ed.), La Tribube Internationale des Langues Vivantes, 36, 114–122. Paris.

Montreuil, Jean-Pierre. 2004b. The Computation of weight in English and in Québec French. First PAC Workshop 23–24 April 2004, Université de Toulouse le Mirail.

Montreuil, Jean-Pierre. 2005. Le poids phonologique en français québécois. Ms., University of Texas, Austin.

Morén, Bruce. 2003. Weight typology: An optimality theoretic approach. The Linguistic Review 20. 281–304.Google Scholar

Paradis, Claude & Denise Deshaies. 1991. Rules of stress assignment in Québec French: Evidence from perceptual data. Language Variation and Change 2. 135–154.Google Scholar

Phinney, Marianne. 1980. Evidence for a Rhythm Rule in Québec French. Proceedings of the Tenth Meeting of the North Eastern Linguistic Society, Cahiers linguistiques d’Ottawa 9. 369–382.Google Scholar

Plénat, Marc. 1987. On the structure of rhyme in Standard French. Linguistics 25. 867–887.Google Scholar

Poliquin, Gabriel. 2006. Canadian French Vowel Harmony. Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard University.

Prince, Alan & Paul Smolensky. 1993/2002/2004. Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Blackwell (2004); Technical Report, Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science and Computer Science Department (2002), University of Colorado at Boulder (1993).

Selkirk, Elizabeth. 1978. The French foot: on the status of “mute” e. Studies in French Linguistics 1. 141–150.Google Scholar

Scullen, Mary Ellen. 1997. French prosodic morphology: A unified account. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Linguistics Club Publications.Google Scholar

Walker, Douglas. 1984. The pronunciation of Canadian French. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.Google Scholar

Zec, D. 2003. Prosodic weight. In Féry, Caroline & Ruben van de Vijver (eds.), The syllable in optimality theory, 123–143. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar