Akmajian, Adrian. 1972. Getting tough. Linguistic Inquiry 3. 373–377.Google Scholar
Anagnostopoulou, Elena. 2003. The syntax of ditransitives: Evidence from clitics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bhatt, Rajesh & Roumyana Izvorski. 1997. Genericity, implicit arguments and control. Paper presented at Student Conference in Linguistics 7 (SCIL 7).Google Scholar
Bhatt, Rajesh & Roumyana Pancheva. 2006. Implicit arguments. In Martin Everaert & Henk Van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Volume 2, 554–584. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bogal-Allbritten, Elizabeth. 2016. Building meaning in Navajo. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Amherst Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
Brillman, Ruth. 2014. Gapped degree phrases are improper movement constructions. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Ms.Google Scholar
Brody, Michael. 1993. θ-theory and arguments. Linguistic Inquiry 24. 1–23.Google Scholar
Bruening, Benjamin. 2014. Defects of defective intervention. Linguistic Inquiry 45. 707–719.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1964. Current issues in linguistic theory. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1973. Conditions on transformations. In Stephen Anderson & Paul Kiparsky (eds.), A Festschrift for Morris Halle, 232–286. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1977. On wh-movement. In Peter Culicover, Thomas Wasow & Adrian Akmajian (eds.), Formal syntax, 71–132. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1982. Some concepts and consequences of the theory of government and binding. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds.), Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, 89–155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, Samuel. 1984. Quantifier-pro and the LF representation of PROarb. Linguistic Inquiry 15. 499–505.Google Scholar
Faraci, Robert. 1974. Aspects of the grammar of infinitives and for-phrases. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
Fleisher, Nicholas. 2013. On the absence of scope reconstruction in tough-subject A-chains. Linguistic Inquiry 44. 321–332.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fleisher, Nicholas. 2015. Rare-class adjectives in the tough-construction. Language 91. 73–108.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Geach, Peter. 1972. A program for syntax. Synthese 22. 3–17.Google Scholar
Gluckman, John. 2016. Taking time with tough-movement. Handout of talk presented at the Linguistic Society of America 2016 Annual Meeting.
Hartman, Jeremy. 2011. Intervention in tough-constructions. In Suzi Lima, Kevin Mullin & Brian Smith (eds.), Proceedings of the 39th Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society (NELS 39), 387–397. Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Hartman, Jeremy. 2012a. (Non-)Intervention in A-movement: Some cross-constructional and cross-linguistic consequences. Linguistic Variation 11. 121–148.Google Scholar
Hartman, Jeremy. 2012b. Varieties of clausal complementation. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
Hicks, Glyn. 2009. Tough-constructions and their derivation. Linguistic Inquiry 40. 535–566.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hornstein, Norbert. 2001. Move! A minimalist theory of construal. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Pauline. 1999. Towards a variable-free semantics. Linguistics and Philosophy 22. 117–184.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, Christopher. 2013. Two sources of subjectivity: Qualitative assessment and dimensional uncertainty. Inquiry 56. 258–277.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 1981. The notional category of modality. In H. J. Eikmeyer & H. Rieser (eds.), Words, worlds, and contexts, 38–74. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 1996. Severing the external argument from its verb. In Johan Rooryck & Laurie Zaring (eds.), Phrase structure and the lexicon, 109–137. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 2006. Decomposing attitude verbs. Talk given in honour of Anita Mittwoch. Jerusalem: The Hebrew University.Google Scholar
Landau, Idan. 2000. Elements of control: Structure and meaning in infinitival constructions. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Lasersohn, Peter. 2005. Context dependence, disagreement, and predicates of personal taste. Linguistics and Philosophy 28. 643–686.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lasnik, Howard & Robert Fiengo. 1974. Complement object deletion. Linguistic Inquiry 5. 535–571.Google Scholar
Lebeaux, David. 1984. Anaphoric binding and the definition of PRO. In Charles Jones & Peter Sells (eds.), Proceedings of the 14th Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society (NELS 14), 253–274. Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Lees, Robert B. 1960. A multiply ambiguous adjectival construction in English. Language 36. 207–221.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Longenbaugh, Nicholas. 2015. Difficult movement. Handout from talk presented at the 46th Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society (NELS 46).
McGinnis, Martha. 1998. Locality in A-movement. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
Moulton, Keir. 2009. Natural selection and the syntax of clausal complementation. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Amherst Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
Moulton, Keir. 2015. CPs: Copies and compositionality. Linguistic Inquiry 46. 305–342.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nissenbaum, Jon. 2000. Investigations of covert phrase movement. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
Nissenbaum, Jon & Bernhard Schwarz. 2011. Parasitic degree phrases. Natural Language Semantics 19. 1–38.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Partee, Barbara. 1977. John is easy to please. In Antonio Zampolli (ed.), Linguistic structures progressing, 281–312. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Poole, Ethan. 2015. An argument for implicit arguments. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Amherst, Ms.Google Scholar
Postal, Paul. 1971. Cross-over phenomena. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Postal, Paul & John R. Ross. 1971. ¡Tough movement si, tough deletion no! Linguistic Inquiry 2. 544–546.Google Scholar
Pylkkänen, Liina. 2002. Introducing arguments. Cambridge, MA: MIT Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
Rezac, Milan. 2006. On tough-movement. In Cedric Boeckx (ed.), Minimalist essays, 288–325. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, Peter S. 1967. The grammar of English predicate complement constructions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ross, John R. 1967. Constraints on variables in syntax. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
Stephenson, Tamina. 2007. Towards a theory of subjective meaning. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
Stephenson, Tamina. 2010. Control in centred worlds. Journal of Semantics 27. 409–436.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sæbø, Kjell Johan. 2009. Judgment ascriptions. Linguistics and Philosophy 32. 327–352.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Torrego, Esther. 1996. Experience and raising verbs. In Robert Freidin (ed.), Current issues in comparative grammar, 101–120. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Williams, Edwin. 1983. Semantic vs. syntactic categories. Linguistics and Philosophy 6. 423–446.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Comments (0)