1. Banister, D., Stead, D., Steen, P., Akerman, J., Dreborg, K. & Nijkamp, P. (2000). European transportpolicy and sustainable mobility. London: Spon Press.Google Scholar
2. Bristow, A., Pearman, A., & Shires, J. (1997). An assessment of advanced transport telematics evaluation procedures. Transport Reviews, 17(3), 177-205.Google Scholar
3. Cascajo, R. (2004). Socio-environmental benefits of rail urban projects: A European benchmarking. In Proceedings of the European Transport Conference, 2004, 4-6 October. Strasbourg: ETC.Google Scholar
4. Daskalakis, N., & Stathopoulos, A. (2008). Users’ perceptive evaluation of bus arrival time deviations in stochastic networks. Journal of Public Transportation, 11(4), 25-38.Google Scholar
5. Delle Site, P., Filippi, F. (2009). Weighting methods in multi-attribute assessment of transport projects. European Transport Research Review, 1, 199-206.Google Scholar
6. EBSF. (2012). Evaluation report of use cases. (Deliverable 4.2.3 Ed.)Google Scholar
7. EBSF. (2008-2012). European Bus System of the Future. VII Framework Programme. European Commission. Retrieved 25th September, 2012, from http://www.ebsf.eu/index.php/objectivesGoogle Scholar
8. Hounsell, N. B., Shrestha, B. P., Piao, J. & McDonald, M. (2009). Review of urban traffic management and the impacts of new vehicle technologies. IET Intelligent Transport Systems, 3(4), 419-428.Google Scholar
9. Lappin, J. (2000). What have we learned about advanced traveler information systems and customer satisfaction? Chapter 4. In What have we learned about ITS? (pp. 66-85). Washington D.C.: Federal Highway Administration, U.S Department of Transportation.Google Scholar
10. Monzon, A., & de la Hoz, D. (2009). Efectos sobre la movilidad de la dinámica territorial de Madrid. Urban, 14, 58-71.Google Scholar
11. Monzón, A., Pardeiro, A., & Vega, L. (2007). Reducing car trip and pollutant emissions through strategic transport planning in Madrid, Spain. Highway and Urban Environment, 12(1), 81-90.Google Scholar
12. Politis, I., Papaioannou, P., Basbas, S. & Dimitriadis, N. (2010). Evaluation of a bus passenger information system from the users’ point of view in the city of Thessaloniki, Greece. Research inTransportation Economics, 29 (1), 249-255.Google Scholar
13. Tang, L., & Thakuriah, P. (2012). Ridership effects of real-time bus information system: A case study in the city of Chicago. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 22(0), 146-161.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar
Transport and Telecommunication Journal
The Journal of Transport and Telecommunication Institute
4 Issues per year
Cite Score 2016: 0.87
SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.324
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 1.129
Quality of Bus Services Performance: Benefits of Real Time Passenger Information Systems
One of the main problems in urban areas is the steady growth in car ownership and traffic levels. Therefore, the challenge of sustainability is focused on a shift of the demand for mobility from cars to collective means of transport. For this purpose, buses are a key element of the public transport systems. In this respect Real Time Passenger Information (RTPI) systems help people change their travel behaviour towards more sustainable transport modes.
This paper provides an assessment methodology which evaluates how RTPI systems improve the quality of bus services performance in two European cities, Madrid and Bremerhaven. In the case of Madrid, bus punctuality has increased by 3%. Regarding the travellers perception, Madrid raised its quality of service by 6% while Bremerhaven increased by 13%. On the other hand, the users´ perception of Public Transport (PT) image increased by 14%.
Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.