Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Vegetable Crops Research Bulletin

2 Issues per year

Open Access
Online
ISSN
1898-7761
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Yielding and Fruit Quality of Three Sweet Pepper Cultivars from Organic and Conventional Cultivation

Anna Szafirowska / Krystyna Elkner
Published Online: 2009-01-05 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10032-008-0028-x

Yielding and Fruit Quality of Three Sweet Pepper Cultivars from Organic and Conventional Cultivation

The investigations were undertaken to study the effect of cultivar and growing system (organic vs. conventional) on sweet pepper (Capsicum annum L.) yielding, fruit morphology and antioxidants content.

Two hybrids Caryca and Roberta and one open pollinated cultivar Mercedes all of the Polish origin were compared during 2007 and 2008 in the field experiments. Conventional production was based on mineral fertilization and chemical plant protection, while organic relied on compost fertilization and stabilized ecosystem with no chemical used according to EU Regulation 2092/91 for organic farming. The results revealed a good response of bell pepper to organic cultivation system. Marketable fruit yield was higher and morphological characters better from organic cultivation. The content of human health beneficial compounds such as acsorbic acid, total flavonoids, soluble phenols and beta- carotene were investigated at the red stage of fruit maturity. Both the cultivar and growing method influenced the level of examined compounds. Pepper fruits obtained from organic cultivation system comprised higher amount of vitamin C, beta-carotene total flavonoids and polyphenols than from the conventional. Roberta F1 revealed the higher content of vitamin C, beta-carotene than Caryca F1 and Mercedes. Moreover cultivar Roberta F1 demonstrated the highest level of polyphenols in both cultivation systems.

Plonowanie I Jakość Owoców Trzech Odmian Papryki Z Uprawy Ekologicznej I Konwencjonalnej

Przeprowadzono badania nad wpływem odmiany i metody uprawy (ekologiczna i konwencjonalna) na plonowanie, cechy morfologiczne owoców oraz zawartość substancji prozdrowotnych w tym antyoksydantów w owocach papryki.

W doświadczeniach polowych prowadzonych w latach 2007-2008 porównywano trzy polskie odmiany: dwa mieszańce Caryca i Roberta oraz odmianę ustaloną Mercedes. W uprawie konwencjonalnej stosowano nawożenie mineralne i ochronę chemiczną odpowiednią dla gatunku. W uprawie ekologicznej paprykę uprawiano na polu o ustabilizowanym ekosystemie zgodnie z Rozporządzeniem RWE 2092/91 dla produkcji ekologicznej, do nawożenia użyto kompost wytworzony na miejscu, nie stosowano żadnych środków chemicznych. Badania wykazały dobrą reakcję papryki na ekologiczny sposób uprawy. Z uprawy ekologicznej uzyskano wyższy plon handlowy owoców o lepszych cechach morfologicznych. Zawartość substancji prozdrowotnych takich jak witamina C, beta-karoten, flawonoidy ogółem oraz rozpuszczalne fenole były określane w owocach czerwonych. Zarówno odmiana jak i sposób uprawy wpłynęły na zawartość wymienionych substancji prozdrowotnych. W owocach papryki pochodzących z uprawy ekologicznej stwierdzono wyższą zawartość witaminy C, beta-karotenu, flawonoidów ogółem i polifenoli niż z uprawy konwencjonalnej. Wśród badanych odmian Roberta F1 wyróżniała się najwyższym poziomem polifenoli niezależnie od sposobu uprawy.

Keywords: pepper; organic cultivation; fruit quality; antioxidants

  • Asami D. K., Hong Y. J., Mitchell A. E. 2003. Comparison of the total phenolic and ascorbic acid content of freeze-dried and air-dried marionberry, strawberry, and corn grown using conventional, organic, and sustainable agricultural practices. J. Agric. Food Chem.51(5): 1237-1241.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Biacs P. A., Daood H. G., Pavisa A., Hajdu F. 1989. Studies on carotenoid pigments of paprika Capsicum annuum L. var Sz-20. J. Agric. Food Chem.37: 350-353.Google Scholar

  • Block G., Patterson B., Subar A. 1992. Fruit, vegetables, and cancer prevention: a review of the epidemiological evidence. Nutr. Cancer18: 1-29.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bubicz M. 1965. Occurrence of carotenoids in fruits of genus Berberis. Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci. Ser. Sci. Biol.13: 252-255.Google Scholar

  • Buczkowska H. 2005. Uprawa papryki w polu. Plantpress Sp. z o.o Kraków, [in Polish]Google Scholar

  • Brandt K., Molgaard P. 2001. Organic agriculture: does it enhance or reduce the nutritional value of plant food? J. Sci. Food. Agric.81: 924-931.Google Scholar

  • Chu Y. H., Lin Ch., Hsu H. F. 2000. Flavonoid content of several vegetables and their antioxidant activity. J. Sci. Food Agric.80: 561-566.Google Scholar

  • Clark MS., Horwth WR., Shennan C., Scow KM, Lantni WT., Ferris H. 1999. Nitrogen, weeds and water as yield limiting factors in conventional, low-input and organic tomato systems. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment73: 257-270.Google Scholar

  • Davis B. M., Mathews S., Kirk J. T. O. 1970. The nature and biosynthesis of the carotenoids of different colour varieties of Capsicum annuum.Phytochem.9: 797-805.Google Scholar

  • Eberhardt M. V., Lee C. Y., Liu R. H. 2000. Antioxidant activity of fresh apples. Nature405: 903-904.Google Scholar

  • Kaur C., Kapoor H. C. 2002. Antioxidant activity and total phenolic content of some vegetables. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol.37: 153-161.Google Scholar

  • Manach C., Scalbert A., Morand C., Remesy C., Jimenez J. 2004. Polyphenols: food sources and bioavailability. Am. J. Clin. Nutr.79 (5): 727-747.Google Scholar

  • Lee Y., Howard L. R., 1995. Flavonoids and antioxidant activity of fresh pepper (Capisicum annuum) cultivars. J. Food Sci., 60: 473-476.Google Scholar

  • Perucka I., Materska M. 2007. Antioxidant vitamin contents of Capsicum annuum fruit exstracts as affected by processing and varietal factors. Acta Sci. Pol., Technol. Aliment.6(4): 67-73.Google Scholar

  • Pither R., Hall M. N. 1990. Analytical survey of the nutritional composition of organically grown fruits and vegetables. Technical memorandum, 597, MAFF project 4350, Campden food & Drink Research Association.Google Scholar

  • Ragazzi E., Veronese G. 1973. Quantitative analysis of phenolic compounds after thin -layer Chromatographic separation. J. Chromatogr.77: 369-375.Google Scholar

  • Rembiałkowska E., Hallmann E., Wasiak-Zys G. 2003. [Nutritive and sensory quality of tomatoes from organic and conventional cultivation.] Żywienie Człowieka i Metabolizm30 (3/4): 893-899. [Polish with English summary]Google Scholar

  • Rembiałkowska E., Hallmann E., Szafirowska A. 2005. Nutritive quality of tomato fruits from organic and conventional cultivation. Culinary Arts & Sciences V. Warsaw Agric. Univ. Poland: 193-202.Google Scholar

  • Zhishen J., Mengcheng T., Jianming W. 1999. The determination of flavonoid contents in mulberry and their scavenging effects on superoxide radicals. Food Chem.64: 555-559.Google Scholar

  • Vinson J. A., Hao Y., Su X. 1998. Phenol antioxidant quantity and quality in foods: Vegetables J. Agric. Food Chem.46: 3630-3634.Google Scholar

About the article


Published Online: 2009-01-05

Published in Print: 2008-01-01


Citation Information: Vegetable Crops Research Bulletin, ISSN (Online) 1898-7761, ISSN (Print) 1506-9427, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10032-008-0028-x.

Export Citation

This content is open access.

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Ewelina Hallmann and Ewa Rembiałkowska
Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2012, Volume 92, Number 12, Page 2409
[2]
Anna Szafirowska and Krystyna Elkner
Vegetable Crops Research Bulletin, 2009, Volume 71, Number -1

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in