Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

World Political Science

Ed. by Cardinal, Linda

CiteScore 2018: 0.35

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.207
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.349

More options …

Populism and the Ambivalence of Egalitarianism. How Do the Underprivileged Reconcile a Right Wing Party Preference with Their Socio-Economic Attitudes?

Anton Derks
Published Online: 2006-11-29 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1935-6226.1012

This paper attempts to understand the phenomenon of so-called 'unnatural' voting (right-wing voting by lower-status groups). Most scholars explain this phenomenon with cultural motives, such as working-class authoritarianism, yet they assume that it contradicts their economic interests and motives. Although my findings corroborate the importance of working-class authoritarianism, I contend that a working-class vote for the right can also be explained by economic attitudes. Drawing on the theory of populism, I will examine the relationship between cultural attitudes (including authoritarianism and ethnocentrism) and economic rightist attitudes concerning social policy and the welfare state. Economic populism is characterised by egalitarianism as well as anti-welfarism. By addressing economic populism, right-wing parties are able to reconcile their discourse with the economic attitudes of lower status groups. The empirical relevance of this hypothesis is tested on the case of Flanders (Belgium).

About the article

Published Online: 2006-11-29

Citation Information: World Political Science, Volume 2, Issue 3, ISSN (Online) 2363-4782, ISSN (Print) 2363-4774, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1935-6226.1012.

Export Citation

©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Zoe Lefkofridi and Elie Michel
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2014
Erwin Gielens, Femke Roosma, and Peter Achterberg
International Journal of Social Welfare, 2019, Volume 28, Number 4, Page 442
Catarina Kinnvall
Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 2019, Volume 32, Number 3, Page 283
Mark Elchardus and Bram Spruyt
Government and Opposition, 2016, Volume 51, Number 1, Page 111
Lene Holm Pedersen, Rasmus T. Pedersen, and Yosef Bhatti
Public Administration, 2018
Catarina Kinnvall
Humanity & Society, 2018, Page 016059761880264
Nicole VT Lugosi
Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy, 2018, Page 1
Michael Hameleers, Linda Bos, and Claes H. de Vreese
Mass Communication and Society, 2017, Volume 20, Number 4, Page 481
Jeroen van der Waal and Dick Houtman
Urban Affairs Review, 2011, Volume 47, Number 5, Page 642
Gilles Ivaldi and Andrej Zaslove
Revue européenne des sciences sociales, 2015, Number 53-1, Page 121
Ov Cristian Norocel
Critical Social Policy, 2016, Volume 36, Number 3, Page 371
Jeroen van der Waal, Peter Achterberg, Dick Houtman, Willem de Koster, and Katerina Manevska
Journal of European Social Policy, 2010, Volume 20, Number 4, Page 350
Willem de Koster, Peter Achterberg, and Jeroen van der Waal
International Political Science Review, 2013, Volume 34, Number 1, Page 3
Andrea L. P. Pirro
Acta Politica, 2017, Volume 52, Number 3, Page 339
Laurenz Ennser-Jedenastik
Swiss Political Science Review, 2016, Volume 22, Number 3, Page 409
Ann-Cathrine Jungar and Anders Ravik Jupskås
Scandinavian Political Studies, 2014, Volume 37, Number 3, Page 215
Mark Elchardus, Sarah Herbots, and Bram Spruyt
Poetics, 2013, Volume 41, Number 5, Page 524
Andrej Zaslove
Political Studies Review, 2009, Volume 7, Number 3, Page 309

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in