Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

World Political Science

Ed. by Cardinal, Linda

2 Issues per year


CiteScore 2017: 0.28

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.211
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.143

Online
ISSN
2363-4782
See all formats and pricing
More options …

A Special Majority Cabinet? Supported Minority Governance and Parliamentary Behavior in the Netherlands

Simon Otjes / Tom Louwerse
Published Online: 2014-08-05 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/wpsr-2014-0016

Abstract

This article studies how the presence of the supported minority government Rutte-I affected patterns of legislative behavior. On the basis of the literature on minority cabinets, one would expect that during supported minority cabinets parliamentary parties cooperate more often across the division between coalition and opposition than under multiparty majority cabinet rule. Examining almost 30,000 parliamentary votes between 1994 and 2012, this study finds that on a host of indicators of coalition-opposition-cooperation, there was less cooperation “across the aisle” during the Rutte-I cabinet than during any cabinet before it. We explain this with reference to the encompassing nature of the support agreement as well as the impact of the cabinets’ ideological composition.

Keywords: minority cabinet; majority cabinet; parliamentary behavior; the Netherlands

References

  • Alemán, E., E. Calvo, M. P. Jones and N. Kaplan (2009) “Comparing Cosponsorship and Roll-Call Ideal Points,” Legislative Studies Quarterly, 34(1):87–116.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Andeweg, R. B. (1992) “Executive-Legislative Relations in the Netherlands: Consecutive and Coexisting Patterns,” Legislative Studies Quarterly, 17(2):161–182.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Andeweg, R. B. (2004) “Parliamentary Democracy in the Netherlands,” Parliamentary Affairs, 57(3):568–580.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Andeweg, R. B. (2006) “Towards a Stronger Parliament? Electoral Engineering of Executive-Legislative Relations,” Acta Politica, 41(3):232–248.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Andeweg, R. B. (2011) “Purple Puzzles: The 1994 and 1998 Government Formations in The Netherlands and Coalition Theory.” In: (R. B. Andeweg, L. De Winter and P. Dumont, eds.) Puzzles of Government Formation: Coalition Theory and Deviant Cases. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 147–164.Google Scholar

  • Andeweg, R. B., L. De Winter and P. Dumont, eds. (2011) Government Formation: Coalition Theory and Deviant Cases. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Bale, T. and C. Dann (2002) “Is the Grass Really Greener?: The Rationale and Reality of Support Party Status: A New Zealand Case Study,” Party Politics, 8(3):349–365.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bale, T. and T. Bergman (2006a) “A Taste of Honey Is Worse Than None at All?: Coping with the Generic Challenges of Support Party Status in Sweden and New Zealand,” Party Politics, 12(2):189–202.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bale, T. and T. Bergman (2006b) “Captives No Longer, but Servants Still? Contract Parliamentarism and the New Minority Governance in Sweden and New Zealand,” Government and Opposition, 41(3):422–449.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Boston, J. and D. Bullock (2010) “Multi-party Governance: Managing the Unity-distinctiveness Dilemma in Executive Coalitions,” Party Politics, 18(3):349–368.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Christiansen, F. J. and R. B. Pedersen (2012) “The Impact of the European Union on Coalition Formation in a Minority System: The Case of Denmark,” Scandinavian Political Studies, 35(3):179–197.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • De Vries, C. and S. de Lange (2010) “Minderheidskabinet kan zegen zijn,” De Volkskrant, August 7.Google Scholar

  • Field, B. N. (2009) “Minority Government and Legislative Politics in a Multilevel State: Spain Under Zapatero,” South European Society and Politics, 14(4):417–434.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Godbout, J. F. and B. Høyland (2011) “Legislative Voting in the Canadian Parliament,” Canadian Journal of Political Science, 44(2):367–388.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hall, P.A. and R. C. R. Taylor (1996) “Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms,” Political Studies, 44(5):936–957.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Herman, V. and J. Pope (1973) “Minority Governments in Western Democracies,” British Journal of Political Science, 3(2):191–212.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hix, S. and A. Noury (2011) “Government-Opposition or Left-Right? The Institutional Determinants of Voting in Legislatures.” In: EPSA Conference. June 16–18, Dublin, Ireland.Google Scholar

  • Holzhacker, R. (2002) “National Parliamentary Scrutiny Over EU Issues: Comparing the Goals and Methods of Governing and Opposition Parties,” European Union Politics, 3(4):459–479.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kim, Y. (2008) “Intra-Party Politics and Minority Coalition Government in South Korea,” Japanese Journal of Political Science, 9(3):367.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Koninklijke Bibliotheek (2010) Staten-Generaal Digitaal. http://www.statengeneraaldigitaal.nl/ Last accessed September 2, 2013.

  • Laver, M. J. (2006) “Legislatures and Parliaments in Comparative Context.” In: (B. Weingast and D. Wittman, eds.) Oxford Handbook of Political Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 121–140.Google Scholar

  • Lijphart, A. (1999) Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in 36 Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

  • Louwerse, T. (2011) Political Parties and the Democratic Mandate. Comparing Collective Mandate Fulfilment in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands. PhD Thesis Leiden University.Google Scholar

  • Louwerse, T. (2012) “Mechanisms of Issue Congruence: The Democratic Party Mandate,” West European Politics, 35(6):1249–1271.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Mair, P. (1997) Party System Change: Approaches and Interpretations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • March, J. G. and J. P. Olsen (1984) “The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life,” The American Political Science Review, 78(3):734–749.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Martin, L. W. and G. Vanberg (2008) “Coalition Government and Political Communication,” Political Research Quarterly, 61(3):502–516.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Officiële Bekendmakingen (2013) “Officiële Bekendmakingen. https://zoek.officielebekendmakingen.nl/. Last accessed September 2, 2013.

  • Otjes, S. (2011) “The Fortuyn Effect Revisited: How Did the LPF Affect the Dutch Parliamentary Party System?,” Acta Politica, 46(4):400–424.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Otjes, S. (2012) Imitating the Newcomer. How, When and Why Established Political Parties Imitate the Policy Positions and Issue Attention of New Political Parties in the Electoral and Parliamentary Arena: the Case of the Netherlands. PhD Thesis Leiden University.Google Scholar

  • Pedrazzani, A. (2012) “Looking Beyond the Aggregate Figures. An Investigation of the Consensual Approval of Italian Government Bills (1988–2006),” Paper presented at the 26th Annual Conference of the Italian Political Science Association (SISP), Rome.Google Scholar

  • Strøm, K. (1984) “Minority Governments in Parliamentary Democracies – The Rationality of Nonwinning Cabinet Solutions,” Comparative Political Studies, 17(2):199–227.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Strøm, K. (1990). Minority Government and Majority Rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Strøm, K. (1997) “Democracy, Accountability, and Coalition Bargaining,” European Journal of Political Research, 31(1):47–62.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Timmermans, Arco and Rudy B. Andeweg (2000) “Coalition Cabinets in the Netherlands: Still the Politics of Accommodation?,” In: (W. C. Müller and K. Strøm, eds.) Coalition Governments in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Valen, H. and H. M. Narud (2007) “The Conditional Party Mandate: A Model for the Study of Mass and Elite Opinion Patterns,” European Journal of Political Research, 46(3):293–318.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Van Aelst, P. and T. Louwerse (2013) “Parliament without Government: The Belgian Parliament and the Government Formation Processes of 2007–2011,” West European Politics, 37(3):475–496.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

About the article

Corresponding author: Simon Otjes, Groningen University – Documentation Centre Dutch Political Parties, Groningen, Netherlands, e-mail:


Published Online: 2014-08-05

Published in Print: 2014-10-01


Citation Information: World Political Science, Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages 343–363, ISSN (Online) 2363-4782, ISSN (Print) 2363-4774, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/wpsr-2014-0016.

Export Citation

©2014 by De Gruyter.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in