Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Yearbook for Eastern and Western Philosophy

Ed. by Feger, Hans / Dikun, Xie / Ge, Wang

Online
ISSN
2196-5897
See all formats and pricing
More options …

15 How to Jointly Decide What Ought to Be Done?

An Excursion into Contemporary Chinese Theories of Public Moral Justification

Philippe Brunozzi
Published Online: 2016-07-27 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/yewph-2016-0017

Abstract

This paper focuses on contemporary Chinese theories of public moral justification and engages in the mainly descriptive project of introducing how, according to at least some contemporary Chinese theorists, we ought to decide which moral order shall figure as the common normative framework for our undertakings so that it can be considered to be publicly justified to all. Giving a closer reading of four Chinese theorists (Zhao Tingyang, Wan Junren, Fan Hao and Gao Zhaoming), it will become apparent that these accounts display an internal dynamic that shall allow us to relate them so as to draw the rough outlines of a possible coherent account of public moral justification. In the centre of this account will figure a standpoint that may be coined as a “first-person plural standpoint”.

About the article

Published Online: 2016-07-27

Published in Print: 2016-07-25


Citation Information: Yearbook for Eastern and Western Philosophy, Volume 2016, Issue 1, Pages 175–197, ISSN (Online) 2196-5897, ISSN (Print) 2196-5889, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/yewph-2016-0017.

Export Citation

© 2016 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in